I think we know the answer—without even hearing the question. If it had been Trump he would have been impeached and removed, because no one would have defended him. Because the offenses are indefensible. And that’s pretty much why I don’t spend much time chronicling the latest corrupt outrages against the body politic by the Baidan crime family. What’s the point? Maybe there’ll be some point after Election 2022. In the meantime, others are keeping track for us. Yesterday we referenced—as even the NYT has done—Hunter’s great Cobalt Scam, helping to give China a strategic advantage over the US. Huh! No wonder I call his father Zhou Baidan.
The purpose of stories like the recent NYT piece is to dampen the charge that conservatives make that the MSM doesn't cover stories on Democrats. So the times, WaPost writes a story that no one talks about. But when it comes up later, the progressive liberal line is, but that was reported.
Durham's indictments I fear are part of a similar PR strategy. Couple three four scalps and it's move on. We are living in a PR world, not a constitutional republic world, not a rule of law world (alas), nor a meaning in history world (alas). I think PR types like Trump intuit that, but few others on the conservative side of the spectrum do/can/find it a comfortable world.
That's not even a serious question, anymore. Most of them (in addition to having no moral principles) have enough survival instinct to know not to throw stones in glass houses.
If what you are implying were the case, I would have to commend the criminal cabalist's efforts at verisimilitude; I mean, my CGI Biden would speak in coherent sentences.
The purpose of stories like the recent NYT piece is to dampen the charge that conservatives make that the MSM doesn't cover stories on Democrats. So the times, WaPost writes a story that no one talks about. But when it comes up later, the progressive liberal line is, but that was reported.
Durham's indictments I fear are part of a similar PR strategy. Couple three four scalps and it's move on. We are living in a PR world, not a constitutional republic world, not a rule of law world (alas), nor a meaning in history world (alas). I think PR types like Trump intuit that, but few others on the conservative side of the spectrum do/can/find it a comfortable world.
Here’s the $64k question: do the Republicans have the cahones to impeach Bai Den when they take the House next year?
Seems to me impeachment only ever goes one way, like pretty much everything else.
That's not even a serious question, anymore. Most of them (in addition to having no moral principles) have enough survival instinct to know not to throw stones in glass houses.
Makes one wonder if the majority of journo-fisters™ are ALSO on the payroll of the CCP. That would explain their curious silence.
On the payroll...or on the same side.
Payroll of CCP, USG, Soros, NYT, et al: same, same.
Esp. the DS.
If what you are implying were the case, I would have to commend the criminal cabalist's efforts at verisimilitude; I mean, my CGI Biden would speak in coherent sentences.