I think we know the answer—without even hearing the question. If it had been Trump he would have been impeached and removed, because no one would have defended him. Because the offenses are indefensible.
And that’s pretty much why I don’t spend much time chronicling the latest corrupt outrages against the body politic by the Baidan crime family. What’s the point? Maybe there’ll be some point after Election 2022. In the meantime, others are keeping track for us. Yesterday we referenced—as even the NYT has done—Hunter’s great Cobalt Scam, helping to give China a strategic advantage over the US. Huh! No wonder I call his father Zhou Baidan.
Anyway, here is a series of tweets by Jonathan Turley in which Turley pretty much beats the ‘What if Trump’ horse to death. He also links his article on the subject:
I previously wrote on the anniversary of the Hunter Biden laptop story that marveled at how the Bidens made the scandal vanish like Houdini's elephant in front of millions. In an encore, a new major story on Chinese dealings has surfaced. Once again, poof!
I previously wrote a column on the one year anniversary of the Hunter Biden laptop story that marveled at the success of the Biden family in making the scandal vanish before that 2020 election. It …
...This elephant is truly difficult to unsee. It means that through the election, Hunter Biden was still receiving money from a variety of companies with close ties to the Chinese, Russian, and Ukrainian governments...
...In this case, his alleged influence peddling was used to deliver a huge strategic advantage to the Chinese in the very area of electric cars that his father was making an American investment priority.
And from the article:
The media has made the story disappearexcept for a couple of the usual outlets. Even with the New York Times reporting on the story, the disclosure of Biden’s role in securing one of the world’s largest cobalt mines for China (a key component to electric battery production) has been ignored by the major networks and many other print outlets. Once again, ABC. NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and other media just cannot see the elephant.
What is most amazing about this continuing trick is that the story has all of the elements that the media longed to confirm during the Trump Administration on the financial dealings of the Trump children. The son of the President was involved in a successful effort to handover a strategically vital natural resource to the Chinese that would guarantee their dominance in one of the most important new industries of the “Green economy.” This occurred during a period when Hunter Biden and his uncle were accused of running a global influence peddling operation with foreign powers that cashed in on the Vice Presidency of Joe Biden. Then there is the fact that the story appears to contradict denials of continuing ownership in such foreign interests by the Bidens.
Amazing? Or business as usual? The point is a simple one: It’s not Trump and that makes all the difference. This is simply where America is, it’s who we are as a nation, as Obama used to say.
The purpose of stories like the recent NYT piece is to dampen the charge that conservatives make that the MSM doesn't cover stories on Democrats. So the times, WaPost writes a story that no one talks about. But when it comes up later, the progressive liberal line is, but that was reported.
Makes one wonder if the majority of journo-fisters™ are ALSO on the payroll of the CCP. That would explain their curious silence.
The purpose of stories like the recent NYT piece is to dampen the charge that conservatives make that the MSM doesn't cover stories on Democrats. So the times, WaPost writes a story that no one talks about. But when it comes up later, the progressive liberal line is, but that was reported.