It's an excellent article--with one flaw. She implicitly exaggerates the risk to older people. Sucharit Bhakdi--himself an older person--has emphatically pointed to what is right there in the stats: healthy older people do well, too. It's simply that older people tend to have the comorbidities that are problematic.
Just did a ddg search and all the top stories attach "misinformation" to the poor doctor. It's really shameful that so many will put maintaining a narrative in front of trying to save lives.
And therein we have the makings for criminal prosecution of such officials responsible for such orders and such policies. Murder. They have been withholding lifesaving treatments from the beginning. Indict them all.
The Nuremberg II trials will start soon. https://www.marktaliano.net/team-of-1000-lawyers-and-10000-medical-experts-start-nuremberg-2-trial-against-world-leaders-for-crimes-against-humanity/
Yes, just read a different version of that.
Random works for me.
Or they didn't want them to be noticed.
It's an excellent article--with one flaw. She implicitly exaggerates the risk to older people. Sucharit Bhakdi--himself an older person--has emphatically pointed to what is right there in the stats: healthy older people do well, too. It's simply that older people tend to have the comorbidities that are problematic.
Getting a cold is probably a good way to keep your immune system tuned up for Covid.
Just did a ddg search and all the top stories attach "misinformation" to the poor doctor. It's really shameful that so many will put maintaining a narrative in front of trying to save lives.
I saw that story. Pure evil.
And therein we have the makings for criminal prosecution of such officials responsible for such orders and such policies. Murder. They have been withholding lifesaving treatments from the beginning. Indict them all.
Not Pfizer. J&J is splitting due to the talcum powder suits.
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-people-died-in-the-key-clinical