11 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Wauck's avatar

Admin: Today we have cataract surgery for the second eye. Tomorrow follow up appointment. Wednesday mental health/grampa day.

Expand full comment
Wolf J Flywheel's avatar

Yes, best of luck to you, Mark.

Expand full comment
NFO's avatar

Wishing another successful outcome!

Expand full comment
Ivar Ruslan's avatar

The LAW (!!) is probably only being effected in order to send countless HERITAGE Americans off to a gulag elsewhere (Siberia South) if they dare to bitch about the Self-Chosen Tribe. But it's a start, for what it's worth. Our military will be deployed to wherever they're assigned, no matter who they vote for. Gotta hustle-up the End Times and all that. TY, Mark, much appreciated as always.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

I imagine you saw the most recent fiasco being voted on soon

This really is destroying the US

Overview of H.R. 867 (Israel Anti-Boycott Act)

H.R. 867 is a legislative proposal introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to deter Americans from participating in boycotts of Israel or Israeli settlements, particularly those promoted or coordinated by international governmental organizations such as the United Nations, the European Union, or other international bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or human rights organizations (e.g., Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International).

The bill prohibits Americans from engaging in or supporting boycotts of Israel or Israeli settlements if those boycotts are initiated, encouraged, or coordinated by international governmental organizations (e.g., UN, EU) or certain non-governmental organizations (e.g., human rights groups like Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch).

This includes refusing to do business with Israeli companies, purchasing goods from Israel or Israeli settlements, or participating in campaigns that advocate for such boycotts.

The penalties outlined in H.R. 867 and related legislation are severe, reflecting the bill’s intent to deter participation in BDS:

Fines: Up to $1 million in civil penalties for violations.

Imprisonment: A maximum of 20 years in prison for criminal violations, particularly for those who actively organize or promote boycotts.

These penalties apply to individuals, businesses, or organizations found to be in violation of the bill’s provisions.

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

Horrifying --- You may all be guilty if you urged on X or any other social media to friends or family fellow church temple or mosque mates or work partners of not buying Israeli products

.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

"These are all the kinds of things that got Trump elected. Not bombing far away countries and supporting genocide."

Trump has accomplishments, no one can take that away - Musk is a great example, like it or not if US do not reign in monetary issues US is done.

But What is Often Overlooked is --- Trump's Greatest Failure ----- the UN

Hard to beat Genocide as a failure, hard to beat Yemen Iran Russia as a failure

So that's some pretty big issues there

GIVING Away or PUSHING Away the UN into - China and Russias hands- is Trump's Greatest Failure

The United States Created the United Nations (at least in large part)

The United States pays/contributes the largest amount of funds toward UN Budget

The United States hosts the United Nations Headquarters in New York City

--- Obviously the world is changing and Russia and China have become World Powers - one may disagree or agree that they are equal to US - but the fact of the matter is - Russia and China are world powers and - growing - in stature and power

If the US wants to maintain any modicum of power over world relations some 20 - 30 years from now -- the US Must maintain credibitiliy and stature in the UN - and be building stature and credibility or at least maintaining it, instead of burning.

The table has been set - for the rest of the world against the US. -- And it's not only sad but dangerous.

.

Expand full comment
Classic Rider's avatar

Credibility and stature in the UN? Is this sarcasm? The UN is the answer to the Jeopardy question of what is the most corrupt government organization in the world.

Expand full comment
Doug Hoover's avatar

Chief John Roberts is about as reliable as Judas Pence.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

CJ Roberts is the reason DC circuit got it right.

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

AC - would you expand on that, do you mean was CJR's intentional doings (aka his long game is working) or was it due to his perceived failings?

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Beyond the Chief Justice's message on following appellate processes and Mark's several articles on CJ Roberts intent to guide ALL courts...

SCOTUS already ruled on this case that Judge James Boasberg lacked jurisdiction, and vacated his TRO's as a result. Yet even though SCOTUS tossed these TRO's, Boasberg is still trying to enforce them and is ignoring his lack of jurisdiction.

Judge James Boasberg is actively defying SCOTUS and the law. Something the left claims to care about, but apparently not when it wouldn't support their goals. Anyone who claims that SCOTUS rulings shouldn't be ignored, should be outraged.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a931_2c83.pdf

Expand full comment