Quite some time ago I gave up trying to present a continuing chronicle of events in the war in Ukraine. Following the shambles of the Ukraine/NATO “counteroffensive” the Russian forces have shifted to an “active defense” and now, increasingly, to what looks like the beginning of a real offensive. Western media is full of warnings of a looming Ukrainian “collapse”, as the Russians grind forward against failing Ukrainian forces.
With so many puppeteers (US, UK, Israel, France, Islamic fundamentalists, Nazis etc.) pulling the strings of the marionettes in Ukraine, one really has to wonder who is calling the shots. Mass killing of civilians in Moscow seems like a stupid act.
Putin has shown himself to be a master of restraint and self-control in the face of what I would certainly call reckless provocation and he has said all along that he’s the one in control, not NATO, not Ukraine and certainly not the West. The Russian declaration that the SMO was now officially a war, wasn’t so much saber rattling as much as it was a clear message to the West, and the US specifically, “we are not playing around and if you persist in escalating the provocations, then we will respond accordingly”. As many here have said, this is a very dangerous game that the globalists/neocons are playing
Putin's overwhelming re-election and now the terrorist attack seem to have marked a turning point. Nothing new, but just a big upshift in gears of the existing strategy. Let's see if NATO is stupid enough to try and stop Russia taking Odessa.
The Ukrainian missile attack was to counter the narrative of the massive 3 day Russian missile attack.
Bear vs B52
Bear has longer range, but less payload with turbo prop vs Jet Engines. Bear has gone into the Recon and missile carrier roles. B-52 can carpet bomb if defenders have no anti aircraft ability or launch cruise missiles.
Thank you for keeping us updated and informed.
With so many puppeteers (US, UK, Israel, France, Islamic fundamentalists, Nazis etc.) pulling the strings of the marionettes in Ukraine, one really has to wonder who is calling the shots. Mass killing of civilians in Moscow seems like a stupid act.
Unless of course someone wants to up the ante.
Putin has shown himself to be a master of restraint and self-control in the face of what I would certainly call reckless provocation and he has said all along that he’s the one in control, not NATO, not Ukraine and certainly not the West. The Russian declaration that the SMO was now officially a war, wasn’t so much saber rattling as much as it was a clear message to the West, and the US specifically, “we are not playing around and if you persist in escalating the provocations, then we will respond accordingly”. As many here have said, this is a very dangerous game that the globalists/neocons are playing
and Putin is not in the mood for games!
"...It supplies liquefied natural gas, which is used to power military bunkers, warehouses, command posts and other facilities..."
Take out the word "liquified." There is no way a land-locked facility makes LNG. Transport is not feasible, since it has to be kept at -260 degrees F.
Putin's overwhelming re-election and now the terrorist attack seem to have marked a turning point. Nothing new, but just a big upshift in gears of the existing strategy. Let's see if NATO is stupid enough to try and stop Russia taking Odessa.
The Ukrainian missile attack was to counter the narrative of the massive 3 day Russian missile attack.
Bear vs B52
Bear has longer range, but less payload with turbo prop vs Jet Engines. Bear has gone into the Recon and missile carrier roles. B-52 can carpet bomb if defenders have no anti aircraft ability or launch cruise missiles.
"European atural gas shortage incoming."
2nd word needs an 'n', to make it natural. ;)
Cheers