9 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

My thoughts, too, regarding Johnson. To get to be Speaker with a divived GOP, and getting a unanimous vote (if my memory is correct), means he's on a short leash. Rep. Johnson might be against aid, but Speaker Johnson doesn't seem to be. I think I saw Johnson is proposing $70 B for Ukraine. It's the fault of We the People! We need to educate ourselves, not falling for the same faux outrage, the tired slogans, etc. Vote in a new breed of elected officials who possess integrity. And,.... change your elected officials on the same schedule as you change the antifreeze in your vehicle.

Expand full comment

So this $70B in Ukraine aid can be tied to the $80B for the Inflate Reduce Act - IRS.

Expand full comment

Good luck with the “educating ourselves” part. Left been in charge of public schools for 60+ years. Every year a new phalanx of leftists, sprinkled with a couple American kids, gets pumped into the arteries. We’ve been over the cliff for awhile now. Just waiting for us to smack into the bottom.

Expand full comment

Responding to my own comment. If Johnson had stood tall and opposed money for Ukraine, they would've deposed him. I was pretty happy when we had no Speaker. The House was in paralysis and wasn't stealing from the Treasury.

Expand full comment

Maybe that's what he should have done.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Nov 3, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

But he does want to send billions to Israel. Where's the win here?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Nov 4, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Hi KLG. I don't think they are mutually exclusive. We need to be moving towards a situation where we don't spend money on EITHER of these options.

Expand full comment