If you haven’t listened to it, here’s link to the Rumble video embedded at CTH. Understand, of course, that Malone speaks in a very deliberate manner and Tucker, to his credit, allows him to work his thoughts out into speech. It’s an hour long and somewhat slow paced, but deeply interesting in a number of respects.
With reference to the comments about becoming "embarrassed" about vaccines, I believe Doctor Malone may have been influenced by a recent interview with Candace Owens (which I highly recommend).
During that interview, Ms. Owens pointed out the (shockingly) low numbers of people that had illnesses each year (such as Tetanus), and how these low numbers were not a sufficient cause for the huge vaccine programs that followed (and continue).
Doctor Malone seemed very surprised by this information. It would not surprise me to learn that, following the interview, he researched this topic further - leading to his "embarrassment".
That is what I like about Dr. Malone. When he "sees" new information, he looks into it. He doesn't immediately disregard it or attack it, as most people I have seen do. I try to do the same when I see new information. At 72, I have very different views from years ago. I have always questioned vaccines, especially when I saw the charts about them. I knew "safe & effective" was a selling point and not provable in the vast majority of cases.
off topic
has the virus been sequenced? if no does that mean it doesn't exist
Another Young Global Leader is none other than Dan Crenshaw the rino pirate from the Great State of Texas. WEF is an evil operation.
Wow on the list. Soft power indeed.
With reference to the comments about becoming "embarrassed" about vaccines, I believe Doctor Malone may have been influenced by a recent interview with Candace Owens (which I highly recommend).
During that interview, Ms. Owens pointed out the (shockingly) low numbers of people that had illnesses each year (such as Tetanus), and how these low numbers were not a sufficient cause for the huge vaccine programs that followed (and continue).
Doctor Malone seemed very surprised by this information. It would not surprise me to learn that, following the interview, he researched this topic further - leading to his "embarrassment".
That is what I like about Dr. Malone. When he "sees" new information, he looks into it. He doesn't immediately disregard it or attack it, as most people I have seen do. I try to do the same when I see new information. At 72, I have very different views from years ago. I have always questioned vaccines, especially when I saw the charts about them. I knew "safe & effective" was a selling point and not provable in the vast majority of cases.