28 Comments
User's avatar
Not an Amercian's avatar

What are the Anglo-Zionists playing at?

After WWII Germany and Japan were devastated, but the money powers created economic miracles off the backs of defeated peoples' desire to rebuild their countries.

Take a look at Dresden 1945: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=dresden+after+bombing&iax=images&ia=images

Dresden today: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dresden+modern+day&t=lm&iax=images&ia=images

How did the money powers manage to pull off the economic miracles and create booming healthy economies? Managing credit.

Who benefits from issuing credit? Yes that's rhetorical.

Never mind the emergency powers governments will grant themselves in a war. Think 2020 on steroids.

So what are they playing at? Expect attacks that cannot be combated and consequent devastation in conjunction with controls the like of which we have not seen before.

Oh, and it might be wise to start learning Russian.

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

Is a vital national security interest threatened?

Do we have a clear attainable objective?

Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?

Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?

Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?

Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?

Is the action supported by the American people?

Do we have genuine broad international support?

Whatever history may judge about him and whatever you and I may think of him - he had a good policy here. Sadly, one may question (with good basis) whether this policy has ever actually been implemented by the U.S. and whether or not it ever will be implemented.

Expand full comment
johnycomelately's avatar

Probably makes sense why Biden was scuttled away, who is commander in chief now?

Biden even at his worst wouldn’t contemplate a nuclear conflagration.

From an outsider looking in, it looks like the US has had a clandestine quasi coupe, with the Neocon war hawks secretly at the helm.

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

sounds about right.

Expand full comment
History Lass's avatar

Seems to me, right after Biden withdrew from the nomination, there was a letter circulating on social media.

Supposedly Biden gave the drivers seat to Blinken complete with keys to the money safe.

Much talk as to whether it was fake etc. Dropped off the radar pretty quick.

Blinken has been pretty busy lately?🤔

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

Would like to see that letter but the premise is entirely believable.

Expand full comment
Meredith Hobbs's avatar

Davis's remarks are well taken. The people running US foreign policy really are this stupid. And reckless.

Expand full comment
Mike richards's avatar

Agree, but the folks behind them are not. And maybe victory/defeat is not the calculus, but continuous war, by whoever against whom ever, which means continuous profits/power. Can’t say I grasp it though

Expand full comment
Yancey Ward's avatar

The US and NATO are full of managers who don't apparently have the ability to think even one step ahead- they aren't chess players and they aren't even checkers players- they are roulette players only.

Expand full comment
Texas Khaan's avatar

I am thinking about two formerly neutral Nordic nations that recently joined NATO. I predict that the devastating Russian attacks will begin there.

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

About 8 years ago my next door neighbor (an active LTC in the Army) was one of those special assignment guys and traveled a lot. When he put his house o the market I asked him why. He said that he was being shipped over to the Baltic states for an extended period as the area was becoming increasingly active. He didn't feel owning a house and leaving it empty for such long periods was not a good near term plan. He also said he couldn't reveal too much about his mission and kept reiterating the action around the Baltics was getting hotter and they were strategizing on how best to protect our interests in the area.. Previously he had been shipped off to the area around the black sea. It's becoming clearer to me what was going on. then. I heard he's back stateside, but i don't know how to get in touch with but it would interesting to ask him about those deployments today.

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

The Baltic states seem to be begging to be "victims" of Russian "aggression," too.

Expand full comment
Texas Khaan's avatar

Rampant suicidal ideation is the norm throughout all of NATOdom .

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

Let's hope that is changing and sanity may be breaking out - for example, in Germany.

Expand full comment
Texas Khaan's avatar

It seems that the Germans have finally figured out what happens when you drink the cyanide laced CoolAid.

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

Maybe Olaf Scholz isn't like Sergeant Schultz? :)

Expand full comment
Ray-SoCa's avatar

Our super duper genius leadership knows by increasing the pressure on Putin he will cave and accept a ceasefire.

So now they are threatening long range missile strikes in Russia it will force a ceasefire.

And what’s the difference between the current Western support, surveillance, analysis, and targeting being done against Russian forces?

Combined with the large scale drone attacks that included hitting a Moscow apartment building.

And the ratcheting up of sanctions via China.

What could go wrong?

Expand full comment
History Lass's avatar

The wizards of smart are completely out of their league when dealing with the Three Great Civilizational powers. Our neo con wizardsxof smart are also totally out their minds🙄

Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

The other day we were wondering why the regime wanted Ukraine to keep the war going until after the election. Well, this is one way to do it... I'm surprised, though, because it would be so easy to cut and run, as with Afghanistan. Nobody voting for Kamala cares about 2021, and I dare say none will care a lot if the narrative is carefully managed for their consumption, between now and the election.

What other deals are taking place? What does Larry Fink think the US should do?

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

Lots of money invested in that there Ukraine, doncha know.

Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

Would the guys that run things please find a way to complete their business deals without so many human beings getting torn up and smashed.

Expand full comment
Not an Amercian's avatar

Yeah, Monopoly money.

Expand full comment
History Lass's avatar

These Clowns thought this "UkraineProject" would be a cakewalk.

They ignored history, ignored warnings, totally underestimated the Russian Federation capabilities (extraordinary hubris) and now are flailing at the nuclear abyss.

I do not see how President Putin could have made Russia's position and Red Lines any clearer.

Will they listen? Why are interviews with Cookies Nuland circulating stating that the US did stop the Istanbul accords?

Expand full comment
Andy Dean's avatar

It's not just that. Since Russia took note that Minsk accords were never meant to be implemented despite being signed, or Yanukovich's deal was forfeit the second it was guaranteed by the Western parties, how can there be any kind of agreement that would be enough to cease hostilities? Who might sign it? What will the guarantees be? Nothing short of disarming NATO and removing it back to its own 1991 borders cuts it, I guess. And that would be the best case scenario. Worst one means rendering the Alliance physically incapable of continuing this war.

Expand full comment
Robert Fausti's avatar

Good point, my dear. Why is Nuland being paraded? One possible reason.......They are trying to justify their past aggression and then to justify their future moves.

Expand full comment