Putin: That Will Mean War

Russia has been issuing explict warnings over the past week regarding the crazy US talk to the effect that America will directly strike Russia with powerful long-range ballistic missiles. Today, Vladimir Putin himself has personally responded, in a statement on Russian TV. Putin unambiguously states that what the Anglo-Zionists are talking about will mean war—not a Special Military Operation against NATO, but War. “War” means gloves off. Follow the link for the video of Putin speaking which is in the Megatron portion. Lanceload provides a more extended transcript:

Megatron @Megatron_ron

BREAKING:

 Putin on the potential use of NATO Long-range weapons against Russia:

"If they do that, NATO is officially at war with Russia "

"This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European nations are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, considering the fundamental shift in the nature of this conflict, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats posed to us," stated Vladimir Putin.

2:53

Lanceload @Lanceloadin

"...maybe the key - is that only NATO servicemen can in fact enter flight assignments into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. And so this is not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not - it is about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not.

If this decision is made it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, European countries, in the war in Ukraine.

This is their direct participation and this already of course, significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict!

This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, European countries, are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then bearing in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be posed to us!"

- Vladimir Putin

Basically - 'If NATO is firing missiles at Russia, and only NATO can fire these missiles, - it doesn't matter if they are fired from the USA, Belgium, or Ukraine - NATO will be at war with Russia.

11:55 AM · Sep 12, 2024

Danny Davis discusses all this in a 45 minute (or so) video that I strongly recommend:

BREAKING NEWS: Putin's Red Line May Be Crossed

Davis is adamant that the US and NATO are utterly unprepared to wage a conventional war with Russia.

Folks, we are not ready to fight a war. You remember, it's been a couple of months now, maybe two or three months even, where I showed you what was admitted by NATO. It said that we had 5% of the air defense forces that we would need if we had to fight a conventional war against Russia.

Davis also quotes a research paper from Chatham House, a wacked out Brit “think tank”, on the matter of preparedness—Russian versus NATO—and it should be sobering:

The Russian Armed Forces remain a credible threat to NATO and its allies. In Ukraine, the Russian military has shown it can absorb losses and maintain tactical-operational credibility despite strategic failures. Russian forces can count on improved reconnaissance fire and strike complexes equipped with a vast arsenal of long-range precision munitions, as well as larger quantities of improved uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). Russian long-range strike and stand-off munitions, coupled with multi-layered air defence systems, represent the biggest conventional threat to NATO.

What are the Anglo-Zionists playing at with these provocations, tugging on Putin’s cape? Davis asserts that they’re stumbling around in the dark for a solution to the fix they’ve landed us in:

Coons [a US senator] keeps saying ‘We're going on to win,’ but what does ‘win’ even mean? One of the things that we never hear—and you didn't hear from Blinken just a second ago, ‘We want a strategic victory for Ukraine,’—what does that mean? And I mean like an actual definition, because if you don't even know what you're trying to accomplish, then how will you even know if it has any chance of success? How will you know—a comparison and analysis of ends and means, I want to achieve this end and so it's going to cost this kind of means to get there—how will you even know if that makes any sense? I have never heard anybody articulate what win means in the last year or so. Earlier on, especially in the 2023 [Ukraine] offensive I heard some people say, ‘Well, it's driving Russia back to the 1991 borders,’ and now we've said, ‘Well, we’ve kind of given up on that,’ but no one has come out with a new definition of what it means, when secretary of state Blinken is using it on the television right there, just days ago.

Then he owes it to us to say, ‘Here's what victory looks like, here's what we envision and what it would take, the means to get to the ends of a victory.’ but he didn't come up with any. Coons didn't even offer even a possibility, he just says, ‘Yeah, we'll just keep giving it.’ You heard the foreign secretary for Britain just say “for as long as it takes”. As long as it takes to what? I mean these are critical questions, critical issues that have to be answered, and no one is answering them. Which gives the impression that we don't know. We're just doing stuff. We're just like saying, ‘I don't know, let's try some long range missiles, see how that works out. We sent some tanks over and some air defense missiles and a few Jets, I don't know, let's try this one.’

See what's going on folks? That's how you stumble into a World War, that's how you stumble into an engagement with a nuclear armed adversary. We have never gotten to a situation in global history where you have two nuclear powers actually fighting each other. We're obviously a razor's edge away from it right now, but there's still at least a degree of separation through the proxy war of us using Ukraine. But that razor thin line is starting to fray and you just heard the president of Russia say that if you go across this line then it's going to mean War. That's nearly as direct as you can possibly make what he just said publicly.

“We’re just doing stuff.” Yikes! Just doing stuff to a nuclear power? That’s how stuff starts hitting the fan.