8 Comments
User's avatar
Shy Boy's avatar

Thanks for taking the time to explain your perspective and intellectual influences. These are interesting ideas.

Expand full comment
N.S. Palmer's avatar

Your discussion of gnostic utopianism reminded me of a passage from *Why Sane People Believe Crazy Things*:

"A perfect society is impossible for three reasons.

First, human beings are imperfect. We are capable of intelligent thought and moral nobility, but not always or even most of the time. Too often, we are selfish, narrow-minded, impatient, cruel, and thoughtless. We want what we want, and we don’t care about others or the common good. We easily rationalize whatever sins we can’t deny. Alexander Pope (1688-1744) described it in his Essay on Man:

'Virtuous and vicious every man must be,

Few in the extreme, but all in the degree;

The rogue and fool by fits is fair and wise;

And even the best by fits what they despise.'

Second, social perfection is subjective. What we consider a 'perfect society' depends on our life experience, emotional makeup, moral values, and settled beliefs. Even people who have a lot in common often disagree about the details of a good society ... There’s no provable definition of a perfect society because it’s only partly dependent on facts. The rest depends on the people defining it.

Third, no matter how fortunate people are, they are never satisfied with what they have. Smart people want to be popular. Popular people want to be smart. Poor people wish they had money. Rich people fondly recall the simplicity of their lives when they were broke ...

Perfection is impossible in human society because it is *imperfection* that motivates us and helps give meaning to our lives. Like the utopian community William James described, a perfect society would be too tame, too second-rate, and too uninspiring. We are not merely thinking machines. We are full-blooded human beings, with energy, drives, and passions that we need to exercise on meeting challenges and solving problems. Without them, we stagnate in mediocrity."

https://www.consilience-publishing.com/whysanepeople/

Expand full comment
Shy Boy's avatar

This seems a bit strawmannish to me. I don't think anyone but abstraction-addled philosophers really believe in the possibility of a realized "perfect society". Practical people, to the extent that they think of these things at all, are concerned with "a good society" or "a better society": very relative and contextually situated notions that come apart easily into specific political, economic, or cultural concerns. These are the carrots that skilled mass-manipulators dangle, to lead us where they want us to go. (I won't bother to characterize the sticks. We all know them well enough.)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 9, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Yes, that's what we're seeing in so many ways.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 9, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Shy Boy's avatar

I don't doubt that's true of a small but powerful cadre. But as with bolshevism, their power derives solely from the submissive compliance of masses of coddled and terrorized ideological pushovers. Fear has much more to do with it than any but the most superficially construed notion of "belief".

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 9, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Shy Boy's avatar

It's a good question. What (de-)motivates people? Many things, of course, in various combinations.

I do think most of us have some "will to comply". I recall personality psychologists call this trait "agreeableness". Go along to get along, don't rock the boat. "Mass formation" wouldn't work without it.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

As we learned to our great cost these last few years, most people are not interested in true freedom in its classical sense or even in thinking for themselves.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 8, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

DD: Do you have a link to this transcript, I can found the video, but not a transcript. I like to read the discussions for better retention of the discussion and information. Thanks in advance if you can point me to the right place to find it.

Expand full comment