Since I was in HS in the 80s I've thought nuclear was inevitable and iit wasn't all the MTV videos with nukes in them either. These weapons allegedly created for our security will be used one day like all weapons before them. The elites and high level govt officials obviously think the same. Smart money is on it. They have bunkers to survive even a nuclear winter with hundreds of thousands of gallons of propane for 20-30 years of energy underground and NASA style air/water scrubbers with full on hydroponic farming. They spend 100s of millions on these personnel bunkers which makes nuclear war even more likely than ever because they won't pay the ultimate price of death.
Comments are not working well. I tired to reply to Jef Cook and was unable to.
Jef
My understanding is Turkey's elites are full of Altanticists. Neo-liberalism is an attractive ideology to global elites in General. Russia has Altanticists too. Neo-liberalism is like feudalism of old. Right of kings and all that. You see college drop out billionaire Gates making policy around the world not to mention paid less than 10% taxes his whole life on capital gains. Things like nationalism, religion, or solidarity movements are an anathema to these folks because they can take away power and wealth from rulers of the universe if they catch on. So yeah billionaire Erdogan gives 100% lip serive to his "muslim brothers"
Real wars are not won with rhetoric, narratives, bluster, or connivance. You need men in arms, lots of war-fighting equipment and supplies, good logistics, and top-notch leadership. If the West truly believed that it was Ukraine or Bust, it would already have begun spinning up into a wartime economy and productivity. Anything less is a charade. And you do not earn respect from your enemy by posing as a badass while lacking any real muscle. NATO is a paper tiger and the rest of the world knows it. Putin's only problem is how to win with minimal loses. The outcome is not in doubt. Trump and his neocon stooges cannot alter this tangible reality. Yes, they can slow down the rate of losing a little bit, at the cost of many more dead Ukrainians, but there is no pot of gold at the end of that rainbow. Stupid is as stupid does.
I'm trying to figure out what the US is doing in Syria. Was a war declared? What are our goals? Are we just there to steal oil? Will Trump exit Syria (he didn't during his first term)?
A blast from the distant past, RFKJr's speech at the Trump rally on August 26,
/quote
[Tiny] Ukraine is a proxy in a geopolitical struggle initiated by the ambitions of the U.S. Neocons for U.S. global hegemony. I’m not excusing Putin for invading Ukraine. He had other options. But the war is Russia’s predictable response to the reckless Neocon project of extending NATO to encircle Russia.
The credulous media rarely explain to Americans that we unilaterally walked away from our two intermediate nuclear weapons treaties with Russia, and then put nuclear-ready Aegis missile systems in Romania and Poland, and that the Biden White House repeatedly spurned Russia’s offer to settle the dispute peacefully.
The Ukraine war began in 2014, when US agencies overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine and installed a handpicked pro-West government that launched a civil war against ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
/endquote
I get it that Trump did not hire RFKJr to fix NatSec, but this seemed like a real commitment allowed by the campaign.
There’s an interesting theory historical/theological as to why the Anglosphere and Isreal are so joined at the hip (beyond the Judaism/Christianity connection), called British Israelite Theory. It has to do with a number of Biblical prophesies regarding Isreal and the end of times, supported by some (sone would say, scant) historical evidence.
The lost tribes of Isreal
After rebelling against God once again, in 720BCE, the Assyrian Conquest of Isreal, saw ten of the twelve tribes of Isreal scattered and ‘lost’. There is some historical evidence that they may have moved north, into present day UK and Northern Europe, though many historians dispute this.
Prophesy #1: Overturning the Kingdom three times and The Stone of Jacob
There is a biblical prophecy that King David’s line would never be broken, but would be overturned three times and then never again.
Some speculate that Jeremiah the Prophet took Jacob’s stone, also called the Stone of Destiny (thought to be the stone the patriarch Jacob laid his head on when he had his dream) at the scattering and there is evidence the Stone of Destiny was used to coronate the kings of Ireland, then Scotland and then England. Jacob’s Stone -also called Lia-Fail in Ireland, the Stone of Scone in Scotland, or the Stone of Destiny was most recently used to coronate King Charles and is placed under the coronation throne of the British Crown during coronation. So the kingdom was overturned three times.
Prophecy #2: A Company of Nations
There is a biblical prophesy that Isreal would become a company of nations.
According to British Israelite Theory, for the reasons mentioned, the Anglo-Saxon countries are actually Israelite descendants and hence their siding with Judah and Benjamin (modern day Isreal). The British Empire spread throughout the world with British descendants making up a significant majority of Canada, the United States, New Zealand and Australia, giving credence to the saying, “the sun never sets on the British Empire", and becoming a "company of of nations".
Prophesy #3: The Battle of Armageddon
The battle to end all battles – the Battle of Armageddon, was prophesied to take place in the Valley of Armageddon (modern day Valley of Jezreel).
The “Kings of the East”, with an army numbering 200 million, go up against Isreal and are defeated. Speculation is that this may talking about China, Russia, and Iran, among others to the East of Isreal. (Interestingly, when the prophesy was given, the number of the army was more than the population of the Earth at the time).
According to British Israelite Theory, this doesn’t mean this 200-million-strong army goes up against the little physical nation of Isreal, but against the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and possibly Northern European countries.
Interesting theory in light of the events unfolding...
I think it has more to do with they control our banks, media, courts, and politicians (via the first two and AIPAC direct donations) the last 50 years they've flooded former Christendom with porn, immigrants, womens second and third wave feminism so we are divided like never before and can't even articulate ourselves or see the threat. I have heard there is some protestant branches of Christianity that love Israel more than Christ himself.
“Interesting“ isn’t one of the words that come to my mind to characterize this “theory.” More like bonkers, insane, delusional, etc.
And, yeah, this “theory” is a real thing. Back when Mark first began using the Anglo-Zionist label, I pointed out the creepy unofficial national anthem of England, typically called “Jerusalem.” See links below:
Oof this is going to get very very ugly. It was certainly optimistic to hope that we could run this gauntlet without getting caught up in an even larger conflict. Expanding now to threaten Syria is really going to piss the Russians off. This could end up quite counterproductive for the west though, as Russia can now spectacularly decapitate Ukraine in a far shorter timeframe.
Russia must be realizing that the only way to counter the anglozionazis globally is to play their game and go low. When that happens the world is going to get quite dangerous. Up to this point, when pressed Russia looked for ways to escalate asymmetrically, carefully husbanding their own resources and supporting allies very quietly. The new weapons afford them the ability to focus on more areas of the conflict simultaneously. If they are feeling confident in their quantities watch for escalation everywhere.
Everything that I have read in the last few months tells me that our military is not what it used to be, and we do not have the resources or capability to fight any kind of war at all. At best we might last 4 to 6 weeks in the field. We have not been able to make recruiting quotes at all for the military. We have numerous navy ships and such that are in mothball right now because we do not have the people to man them.
One thing learned from World War II in the after battle report by the United States Air Force was that bombing alone cannot win a war that is true now as it was then. You have to have a well trained army to go in on the ground to finish the job. Israel is finding out that the military has been depleted over the last 14 months by the war in Gaza and they do not have the capability to keep going. at this point, I see it totally futile for them to depend on the United States military to be able to help them when we don’t have much of a military ground force that we could supply. How many troops can we deploy maybe 150 200,000 at best. we have spent the last two years supplying Israel and Ukraine with all the munitions we could send and now we are dangerously low and we cannot resupply ourselves very quickly because of poor industrial manufacturing capacity.
The people in the current administration and the Trump administration have an over blown view of the capability of what our military can do at this point. I am quite sure that the general and admirals know exactly what kind of shape we are in, which is why they don’t want to get it any type of conflict at all.
And then we have the game changing technology from Russia that has now pulled way ahead of us in missile technology, and we are probably now tend to 15 years behind them. We do not have a hypersonic missile system., we do not have a kinetic energy bomb. We do not have any defensive capability against hypersonic missiles. Our defense system for all intents and purposes does not really exist. We have exactly 44 missiles, which don’t work.
If we even tried to escalate into a nuclear first strike all that’s going to happen in Russia is that the computer will take over and they will launch automatically and then it’s game over for all of us we all die. There is no such thing a winnable nuclear war.
I personally believe that the Russians are now going to be motivated to in the war in Ukraine, sooner rather than later. I think the way they do that. Is there going to use their hypersonic kinetic energy bombs and they’re going to take out vital targets like power plants and such. They may even just finally take out the city of Kyiv and reduce it to rubble with a kinetic energy bomb ending Zielinski and the government. at that point, there’s nothing that the United States, United Kingdom, and Zionist movement can do then. Putin, the West decisively and there will be no negotiations because Putin will hold all the cards. He will dictate terms to West as far as Ukraine and the defensive architecture that he wants to protect Russia. That may be NATO is going to have to pull out of Eastern Europe.
After the Ukraine, problem, Russia and China and Iran will turn their attention toward Israel, and frankly, they just may wipe Israel off the face of the Earth or certainly to the point of forcing them to surrender. We do not have the capability to back Israel in a full-blown war in the Middle East. Our resources would be used up in a matter of weeks. Russia and I ran have the military industrial capability to rear regroup, and they have a battle seasoned army. At some point you have to think reality is going to sink and the futility of their plans will collapse.
That Erdogan is a piece of work. Why would he work with the Anglo-Zionists and US against the Muslim World and Russia?
And if you want to get apocalyptic, there are some interpretations that a treaty between Turkey and Israel gets broken as a kickoff to some of the events that Dutchmn007 outlines.
If you peel it back, I have never seen anything more existential for the West in Ukraine than that if we lose, we are losers. That's a pretty fragile hegemony, isn't it? It sounds more like King of the Raft; you get thrown off into the water, and it is hard to get back on because the new king is pushing you off the ladder.
On the other hand, I think that Trump's foreign policy personnel are truly existential for the Anglo-Zionists. I think that Trump's natural inclination is a multipolar world because the deals are more plentiful and the skill is apparent. All of the Western Leaders despised Trump in Term 1. And he was variously admired, feared, and respected by most of the BRICS+ nations' leaders.
The British Empire rests on control of Mackinder's Eurasian Heartland and the Seas. If the US tacitly or expressly can work with Russia, there goes the Eurasian Heartland. And if Russia can tacitly or expressly work with the US, there goes control of the seas.
The Brits are left to cry in their tea and biryani.
The "Trump-proofing" narrative is sounding more and more idiotic by the day. There is deep continuity between the two administrations and the escalation is coming from both camps. Welcome to the next four years.
"This is why I find Trump’s appointments of Anglo-Zionists to virtually all FP/NS positions so disturbing."
I don't know why this surprises anyone. It's not like he wasn't on team Zion from the get-go, so why expect anything different this time around? Frankly I think attempts to analyze Trump's policies and appointments are a waste of time. He's clearly a stalking horse for the Deep State/Anglo-Zionists. If your goal is world domination using the (allegedly) most powerful nation on earth as your warhorse, it seems obvious that you'd want to control both sides of the political equation and Trump's an easy mark - just appeal to his vanity which he has in abundance.
I don't know why anyone would expect Trump to betray his own class interests. He's a real estate magnate who owes his success entirely to the international financial system which is synonymous with the Deep State. He's not going to do anything to upset their plans, and probably has his eye on building a few hotels in Gaza as his reward. The guy talks big, but in reality he thinks small. Throw him a few bones and he'll do whatever you want, while making it sound like his own idea. Unfortunately his followers, who likewise are not that bright, lap it up.
The best you can hope for with Trump is a rolling back of the woke agenda, which was never that important to begin with - just one of many methods (such as the pandemic) for dividing society into hostile camps who'll battle each other over relatively minor issues while you forge ahead with the main agenda. Same goes for building a wall and deporting illegals. There's upwards of 20 million of them already in place, so yeah let's close that barn door.
Speaking of which, a lot of those illegals are fighting age men, and given the problems inherent in a draft, you could offer them citizenship in exchange for service in an expeditionary army similar to the French Foreign Legion. Israel could sure use something like that. You could also use them internally to suppress the 2A faction, most of whom run their mouths constantly and are therefore easy to identify and disarm. Actually the FBI could probably handle that, but it's always good to have something in reserve for when push comes to shove.
Sorry if I sound pessimist, but all the evidence points to the above conclusions. I'd like to be wrong, trust me, but I see no evidence for it. If you wanted any clearer sign that Trump's their man, look no further than who they ran against him.
Frankly I was hoping for a Kamala win. Since basically nothing changes regardless of who is in power, watching her crash and burn would be far more entertaining than listening to Trump bloviate for the next four years. Been there, done that.
The Syrian rebel attacks means they will be mostly killed, since they left their protected hidey holes.
Another part of this is more about keeping U.S. forces in Syria, by creating too much chaos to allow them to leave. It’s aimed at forcing Trumps actions, and restricting his options.
Since I was in HS in the 80s I've thought nuclear was inevitable and iit wasn't all the MTV videos with nukes in them either. These weapons allegedly created for our security will be used one day like all weapons before them. The elites and high level govt officials obviously think the same. Smart money is on it. They have bunkers to survive even a nuclear winter with hundreds of thousands of gallons of propane for 20-30 years of energy underground and NASA style air/water scrubbers with full on hydroponic farming. They spend 100s of millions on these personnel bunkers which makes nuclear war even more likely than ever because they won't pay the ultimate price of death.
Comments are not working well. I tired to reply to Jef Cook and was unable to.
Jef
My understanding is Turkey's elites are full of Altanticists. Neo-liberalism is an attractive ideology to global elites in General. Russia has Altanticists too. Neo-liberalism is like feudalism of old. Right of kings and all that. You see college drop out billionaire Gates making policy around the world not to mention paid less than 10% taxes his whole life on capital gains. Things like nationalism, religion, or solidarity movements are an anathema to these folks because they can take away power and wealth from rulers of the universe if they catch on. So yeah billionaire Erdogan gives 100% lip serive to his "muslim brothers"
Real wars are not won with rhetoric, narratives, bluster, or connivance. You need men in arms, lots of war-fighting equipment and supplies, good logistics, and top-notch leadership. If the West truly believed that it was Ukraine or Bust, it would already have begun spinning up into a wartime economy and productivity. Anything less is a charade. And you do not earn respect from your enemy by posing as a badass while lacking any real muscle. NATO is a paper tiger and the rest of the world knows it. Putin's only problem is how to win with minimal loses. The outcome is not in doubt. Trump and his neocon stooges cannot alter this tangible reality. Yes, they can slow down the rate of losing a little bit, at the cost of many more dead Ukrainians, but there is no pot of gold at the end of that rainbow. Stupid is as stupid does.
I'm trying to figure out what the US is doing in Syria. Was a war declared? What are our goals? Are we just there to steal oil? Will Trump exit Syria (he didn't during his first term)?
Our goals are to squash any challenge to Israeli hegemony and possibly assist in grabbing more territory. Ardent Zionists claim they want Damascus.
A blast from the distant past, RFKJr's speech at the Trump rally on August 26,
/quote
[Tiny] Ukraine is a proxy in a geopolitical struggle initiated by the ambitions of the U.S. Neocons for U.S. global hegemony. I’m not excusing Putin for invading Ukraine. He had other options. But the war is Russia’s predictable response to the reckless Neocon project of extending NATO to encircle Russia.
The credulous media rarely explain to Americans that we unilaterally walked away from our two intermediate nuclear weapons treaties with Russia, and then put nuclear-ready Aegis missile systems in Romania and Poland, and that the Biden White House repeatedly spurned Russia’s offer to settle the dispute peacefully.
The Ukraine war began in 2014, when US agencies overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine and installed a handpicked pro-West government that launched a civil war against ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
/endquote
I get it that Trump did not hire RFKJr to fix NatSec, but this seemed like a real commitment allowed by the campaign.
There’s an interesting theory historical/theological as to why the Anglosphere and Isreal are so joined at the hip (beyond the Judaism/Christianity connection), called British Israelite Theory. It has to do with a number of Biblical prophesies regarding Isreal and the end of times, supported by some (sone would say, scant) historical evidence.
The lost tribes of Isreal
After rebelling against God once again, in 720BCE, the Assyrian Conquest of Isreal, saw ten of the twelve tribes of Isreal scattered and ‘lost’. There is some historical evidence that they may have moved north, into present day UK and Northern Europe, though many historians dispute this.
Prophesy #1: Overturning the Kingdom three times and The Stone of Jacob
There is a biblical prophecy that King David’s line would never be broken, but would be overturned three times and then never again.
Some speculate that Jeremiah the Prophet took Jacob’s stone, also called the Stone of Destiny (thought to be the stone the patriarch Jacob laid his head on when he had his dream) at the scattering and there is evidence the Stone of Destiny was used to coronate the kings of Ireland, then Scotland and then England. Jacob’s Stone -also called Lia-Fail in Ireland, the Stone of Scone in Scotland, or the Stone of Destiny was most recently used to coronate King Charles and is placed under the coronation throne of the British Crown during coronation. So the kingdom was overturned three times.
Prophecy #2: A Company of Nations
There is a biblical prophesy that Isreal would become a company of nations.
According to British Israelite Theory, for the reasons mentioned, the Anglo-Saxon countries are actually Israelite descendants and hence their siding with Judah and Benjamin (modern day Isreal). The British Empire spread throughout the world with British descendants making up a significant majority of Canada, the United States, New Zealand and Australia, giving credence to the saying, “the sun never sets on the British Empire", and becoming a "company of of nations".
Prophesy #3: The Battle of Armageddon
The battle to end all battles – the Battle of Armageddon, was prophesied to take place in the Valley of Armageddon (modern day Valley of Jezreel).
The “Kings of the East”, with an army numbering 200 million, go up against Isreal and are defeated. Speculation is that this may talking about China, Russia, and Iran, among others to the East of Isreal. (Interestingly, when the prophesy was given, the number of the army was more than the population of the Earth at the time).
According to British Israelite Theory, this doesn’t mean this 200-million-strong army goes up against the little physical nation of Isreal, but against the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and possibly Northern European countries.
Interesting theory in light of the events unfolding...
I think it has more to do with they control our banks, media, courts, and politicians (via the first two and AIPAC direct donations) the last 50 years they've flooded former Christendom with porn, immigrants, womens second and third wave feminism so we are divided like never before and can't even articulate ourselves or see the threat. I have heard there is some protestant branches of Christianity that love Israel more than Christ himself.
“Interesting“ isn’t one of the words that come to my mind to characterize this “theory.” More like bonkers, insane, delusional, etc.
And, yeah, this “theory” is a real thing. Back when Mark first began using the Anglo-Zionist label, I pointed out the creepy unofficial national anthem of England, typically called “Jerusalem.” See links below:
https://youtu.be/rT1HEXNI9c4?si=IMP7dDdlf4f0INqH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_did_those_feet_in_ancient_time#By_Hubert_Parry
Oof this is going to get very very ugly. It was certainly optimistic to hope that we could run this gauntlet without getting caught up in an even larger conflict. Expanding now to threaten Syria is really going to piss the Russians off. This could end up quite counterproductive for the west though, as Russia can now spectacularly decapitate Ukraine in a far shorter timeframe.
Russia must be realizing that the only way to counter the anglozionazis globally is to play their game and go low. When that happens the world is going to get quite dangerous. Up to this point, when pressed Russia looked for ways to escalate asymmetrically, carefully husbanding their own resources and supporting allies very quietly. The new weapons afford them the ability to focus on more areas of the conflict simultaneously. If they are feeling confident in their quantities watch for escalation everywhere.
FAFO
Everything that I have read in the last few months tells me that our military is not what it used to be, and we do not have the resources or capability to fight any kind of war at all. At best we might last 4 to 6 weeks in the field. We have not been able to make recruiting quotes at all for the military. We have numerous navy ships and such that are in mothball right now because we do not have the people to man them.
One thing learned from World War II in the after battle report by the United States Air Force was that bombing alone cannot win a war that is true now as it was then. You have to have a well trained army to go in on the ground to finish the job. Israel is finding out that the military has been depleted over the last 14 months by the war in Gaza and they do not have the capability to keep going. at this point, I see it totally futile for them to depend on the United States military to be able to help them when we don’t have much of a military ground force that we could supply. How many troops can we deploy maybe 150 200,000 at best. we have spent the last two years supplying Israel and Ukraine with all the munitions we could send and now we are dangerously low and we cannot resupply ourselves very quickly because of poor industrial manufacturing capacity.
The people in the current administration and the Trump administration have an over blown view of the capability of what our military can do at this point. I am quite sure that the general and admirals know exactly what kind of shape we are in, which is why they don’t want to get it any type of conflict at all.
And then we have the game changing technology from Russia that has now pulled way ahead of us in missile technology, and we are probably now tend to 15 years behind them. We do not have a hypersonic missile system., we do not have a kinetic energy bomb. We do not have any defensive capability against hypersonic missiles. Our defense system for all intents and purposes does not really exist. We have exactly 44 missiles, which don’t work.
If we even tried to escalate into a nuclear first strike all that’s going to happen in Russia is that the computer will take over and they will launch automatically and then it’s game over for all of us we all die. There is no such thing a winnable nuclear war.
I personally believe that the Russians are now going to be motivated to in the war in Ukraine, sooner rather than later. I think the way they do that. Is there going to use their hypersonic kinetic energy bombs and they’re going to take out vital targets like power plants and such. They may even just finally take out the city of Kyiv and reduce it to rubble with a kinetic energy bomb ending Zielinski and the government. at that point, there’s nothing that the United States, United Kingdom, and Zionist movement can do then. Putin, the West decisively and there will be no negotiations because Putin will hold all the cards. He will dictate terms to West as far as Ukraine and the defensive architecture that he wants to protect Russia. That may be NATO is going to have to pull out of Eastern Europe.
After the Ukraine, problem, Russia and China and Iran will turn their attention toward Israel, and frankly, they just may wipe Israel off the face of the Earth or certainly to the point of forcing them to surrender. We do not have the capability to back Israel in a full-blown war in the Middle East. Our resources would be used up in a matter of weeks. Russia and I ran have the military industrial capability to rear regroup, and they have a battle seasoned army. At some point you have to think reality is going to sink and the futility of their plans will collapse.
“They may even just finally take out the city of Kyiv and reduce it to rubble”
The Russians will never do that. It’s the ancestral capital of Russia as much as it is of Ukraine.
That Erdogan is a piece of work. Why would he work with the Anglo-Zionists and US against the Muslim World and Russia?
And if you want to get apocalyptic, there are some interpretations that a treaty between Turkey and Israel gets broken as a kickoff to some of the events that Dutchmn007 outlines.
If you peel it back, I have never seen anything more existential for the West in Ukraine than that if we lose, we are losers. That's a pretty fragile hegemony, isn't it? It sounds more like King of the Raft; you get thrown off into the water, and it is hard to get back on because the new king is pushing you off the ladder.
On the other hand, I think that Trump's foreign policy personnel are truly existential for the Anglo-Zionists. I think that Trump's natural inclination is a multipolar world because the deals are more plentiful and the skill is apparent. All of the Western Leaders despised Trump in Term 1. And he was variously admired, feared, and respected by most of the BRICS+ nations' leaders.
The British Empire rests on control of Mackinder's Eurasian Heartland and the Seas. If the US tacitly or expressly can work with Russia, there goes the Eurasian Heartland. And if Russia can tacitly or expressly work with the US, there goes control of the seas.
The Brits are left to cry in their tea and biryani.
The "Trump-proofing" narrative is sounding more and more idiotic by the day. There is deep continuity between the two administrations and the escalation is coming from both camps. Welcome to the next four years.
"This is why I find Trump’s appointments of Anglo-Zionists to virtually all FP/NS positions so disturbing."
I don't know why this surprises anyone. It's not like he wasn't on team Zion from the get-go, so why expect anything different this time around? Frankly I think attempts to analyze Trump's policies and appointments are a waste of time. He's clearly a stalking horse for the Deep State/Anglo-Zionists. If your goal is world domination using the (allegedly) most powerful nation on earth as your warhorse, it seems obvious that you'd want to control both sides of the political equation and Trump's an easy mark - just appeal to his vanity which he has in abundance.
I don't know why anyone would expect Trump to betray his own class interests. He's a real estate magnate who owes his success entirely to the international financial system which is synonymous with the Deep State. He's not going to do anything to upset their plans, and probably has his eye on building a few hotels in Gaza as his reward. The guy talks big, but in reality he thinks small. Throw him a few bones and he'll do whatever you want, while making it sound like his own idea. Unfortunately his followers, who likewise are not that bright, lap it up.
The best you can hope for with Trump is a rolling back of the woke agenda, which was never that important to begin with - just one of many methods (such as the pandemic) for dividing society into hostile camps who'll battle each other over relatively minor issues while you forge ahead with the main agenda. Same goes for building a wall and deporting illegals. There's upwards of 20 million of them already in place, so yeah let's close that barn door.
Speaking of which, a lot of those illegals are fighting age men, and given the problems inherent in a draft, you could offer them citizenship in exchange for service in an expeditionary army similar to the French Foreign Legion. Israel could sure use something like that. You could also use them internally to suppress the 2A faction, most of whom run their mouths constantly and are therefore easy to identify and disarm. Actually the FBI could probably handle that, but it's always good to have something in reserve for when push comes to shove.
Sorry if I sound pessimist, but all the evidence points to the above conclusions. I'd like to be wrong, trust me, but I see no evidence for it. If you wanted any clearer sign that Trump's their man, look no further than who they ran against him.
Frankly I was hoping for a Kamala win. Since basically nothing changes regardless of who is in power, watching her crash and burn would be far more entertaining than listening to Trump bloviate for the next four years. Been there, done that.
The Syrian rebel attacks means they will be mostly killed, since they left their protected hidey holes.
Another part of this is more about keeping U.S. forces in Syria, by creating too much chaos to allow them to leave. It’s aimed at forcing Trumps actions, and restricting his options.
https://www.rt.com/news/608422-syrian-jets-strike-jihadist-targets/
British spy chief admits ‘covert action’ in Ukraine
https://www.rt.com/news/608431-mi6-covert-action-ukraine-russia/
I can't believe that NATO wants a big serving of Hazelnuts for the holidays.