Have you noticed that the Global Establishment and its sub-units all the way down to the state and local level here in the US are manicly obsessed with getting the world to Klaus Schwab’s goal—100% injection of the world population? Including little kids? I
The luciferase angle is a red herring. Luciferase is used as a tag in many biochemical screening tests, many of which no doubt were done in the development of the vaccines themselves. From the snippets of the patents that Robinson posted, they seem exactly that- biochemical reagents used in the development of the vaccine, but not part of the ingredients themselves. Luciferase is the enzyme that lightening bugs use to glow at night. In any case, even if luciferase were part of the vaccine itself, it couldn't be used to track you.
Yancey Ward, see my comment else where in the thread. Yes, luciferase could be used to track you. Just take a drop of blood and add luciferase substrate to the blood. It will glow in the dark. Voila! You've been tracked as a vaccinated subject. Now the government can validate your QR code and every time you flash your QR code to the vaccine Stasi you've been tracked! Of course, this is all nonsense because the government doesn't need secret biomarkers to track you. They'll just do it out in the open with laws and forced testing for QR vaccine passports
"Luciferase is commonly used in the biomedical industry. It’s used to tag very tiny things like cells or proteins so that you can track them."
OTOH, it does seem a bit odd to include it in the patents if it's not an actual ingredient.
Also OTOH, ER doesn't actually claim that Luciferase is a tracking agent in these vaccines. She's claiming that:
"Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to tag and track people."
Which, in fact, isn't exactly news. For example, the WEF is touting--among many other similar ideas--a vaccine passport based on a blood test. That sounds like introducing a biometric ID into the blood that can be accessed/confirmed remotely, i.e., non-invasively. Now, some might say that, after all, these injections are into the deltoid muscle, not the blood stream. Whether it was originally known that the injections would--within only a few hours--gain access to the vascular system and travel throughout the body, that is in fact exactly what happens. It seems extraordinarily careless not to have figured that out beforehand. In fact, it's rather hard to believe. And that says something about the credibility of the developing companies.
ER's base claim amounts to saying that the inclusion of Luciferase in the patent looks like an indication that the current vaccines are being used as test beds for future biometric ID uses.
That's not such a crazy idea, in the circumstances. I don't know or understand all the uses that Luciferase can be put to, but it's worth exploring.
Mark, there is an update to the story that you referenced about the WEF preparing a vaccine passport based on a blood test. I was duly outraged the day that I read your original post and the WEF article.
Originally, the story directly implied a detectable blood tag that would be used to validate a vaccine passport, and The Conservative Treehouse spelled it out. A couple of weeks later, however, I was going to email the link to a friend, and I went back to read the article again to be sure I had my facts straight.
In the later version of the story, it directly said that the vaccine passport would be based on a negative COVID test -- no implications of a vaccine tag. I'm dead certain that the story was changed. Here is the link that was changed:
Was it sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist that was corrected later, or is the re-write a cover-up? Occam's razor says it was sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist.
All this talk about secret trackers is nonsense. The government does the tracking right out in the open. They don't need secret biomarkers. We already live in a 24 hour a day panopticon where everything you do is tracked by some user device or camera or government intercept capability. If they want to chip you, they's pass some law and put a chip in you.
People like ER just look stupid when they start implying all these nefarious schemes that the government doesn't need.
"sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist..." Methinks you are trying too hard to convince us it was a mistake. I don't think it was a mistake. I think they are out in the open all right.
I think your faith in the WEF is misplaced. Anyway, Occam's razor is basically a logical fallacy. Occam, the godfather of Nominalism, is one of the great villains of intellectual history. It's interesting that you only saw two alternatives. I'll leave it at that.
Before I leap to outrage about a luciferase tag, let's have some proof. It's extremely simple to do. Just take a blood sample from a vaccinated person and add luciferase substrate. The blood should glow in the dark. After all, if they did use luciferase as a tag, it was done BECAUSE it's so simple. There should be hundreds of millions of tagged people by now, and it would be easy to prove all around the globe.
Furthermore, a tag works both ways. It tags both the vaccinated person, AND it tags the vaccine maker who put it in there. This will be the story of the century it it's true - definitive proof of the great reset! Somehow I'm skeptical.
And while we're on the topic, why the hell doesn't some just take a vial of vaccine and analyze it? To hell with legal agreements and patents. To use a famous phrase, the public has a right to know. Show us the luciferase, the lipid nanoparticles, the graphene, the mRNA, and sequence the mRNA. Show it all!
It's completely implausible that the vaccine makers would put all this alleged stuff in there and actually expect that no one would ever find out. I'm tired of being trolled by right wingers who fail to come up with the goods. Every time I see one of these stories now, I immediately ask, what's wrong with this?
On the other hand, just think of the upside if someone does prove that the vaccines have been monkeyed with. ER is either a fool or a GOAT. The test is simple. Do it!!
People put conspiratorial explanations to to Covid policy, and I can understand that, but I still think that a lot of this is just malignant stupidity. The people who created the vaccines thought they were a way to rid us of Covid, and the proof of this is that they withheld the news until after the election in the hope of inuring Trump politically. The problem is that the jab isn't working out and may be worse than the disease, but they have sunk too much credibility into this to back off now. So they double down. And again. Given time, they may start injecting this crap into the wombs of pregnant women.
I was reading a blog post earlier today that mentioned that by vaccinating kids it changes the liability of the Government to not being liable. I think it was NCVIA and something else. As I understood it, once they vaccinate the kids the vaccines were in a different state of liability to protect the Government. I'm probably confused.
The feed line of this beast is the fraud called PCR.
Fauci: Anything over 35 is “just dead nucleotides, period”.
FDA/CDC: Use 40 cycles
PCR "test" instruction manual: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download (just a regular web page, not a download, they are just too dumb to know the difference)
Demand PCR cycles data or continue losing your freedoms.
I'm still waiting for the 13th Amendment suits
The luciferase angle is a red herring. Luciferase is used as a tag in many biochemical screening tests, many of which no doubt were done in the development of the vaccines themselves. From the snippets of the patents that Robinson posted, they seem exactly that- biochemical reagents used in the development of the vaccine, but not part of the ingredients themselves. Luciferase is the enzyme that lightening bugs use to glow at night. In any case, even if luciferase were part of the vaccine itself, it couldn't be used to track you.
Yancey Ward, see my comment else where in the thread. Yes, luciferase could be used to track you. Just take a drop of blood and add luciferase substrate to the blood. It will glow in the dark. Voila! You've been tracked as a vaccinated subject. Now the government can validate your QR code and every time you flash your QR code to the vaccine Stasi you've been tracked! Of course, this is all nonsense because the government doesn't need secret biomarkers to track you. They'll just do it out in the open with laws and forced testing for QR vaccine passports
ER recognizes that. She writes:
"Luciferase is commonly used in the biomedical industry. It’s used to tag very tiny things like cells or proteins so that you can track them."
OTOH, it does seem a bit odd to include it in the patents if it's not an actual ingredient.
Also OTOH, ER doesn't actually claim that Luciferase is a tracking agent in these vaccines. She's claiming that:
"Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to tag and track people."
Which, in fact, isn't exactly news. For example, the WEF is touting--among many other similar ideas--a vaccine passport based on a blood test. That sounds like introducing a biometric ID into the blood that can be accessed/confirmed remotely, i.e., non-invasively. Now, some might say that, after all, these injections are into the deltoid muscle, not the blood stream. Whether it was originally known that the injections would--within only a few hours--gain access to the vascular system and travel throughout the body, that is in fact exactly what happens. It seems extraordinarily careless not to have figured that out beforehand. In fact, it's rather hard to believe. And that says something about the credibility of the developing companies.
ER's base claim amounts to saying that the inclusion of Luciferase in the patent looks like an indication that the current vaccines are being used as test beds for future biometric ID uses.
That's not such a crazy idea, in the circumstances. I don't know or understand all the uses that Luciferase can be put to, but it's worth exploring.
Mark, there is an update to the story that you referenced about the WEF preparing a vaccine passport based on a blood test. I was duly outraged the day that I read your original post and the WEF article.
Originally, the story directly implied a detectable blood tag that would be used to validate a vaccine passport, and The Conservative Treehouse spelled it out. A couple of weeks later, however, I was going to email the link to a friend, and I went back to read the article again to be sure I had my facts straight.
In the later version of the story, it directly said that the vaccine passport would be based on a negative COVID test -- no implications of a vaccine tag. I'm dead certain that the story was changed. Here is the link that was changed:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/05/what-is-a-vaccine-passport-and-will-you-need-one-the-next-time-you-travel/
Was it sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist that was corrected later, or is the re-write a cover-up? Occam's razor says it was sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist.
All this talk about secret trackers is nonsense. The government does the tracking right out in the open. They don't need secret biomarkers. We already live in a 24 hour a day panopticon where everything you do is tracked by some user device or camera or government intercept capability. If they want to chip you, they's pass some law and put a chip in you.
People like ER just look stupid when they start implying all these nefarious schemes that the government doesn't need.
"sloppy writing from an ignorant journalist..." Methinks you are trying too hard to convince us it was a mistake. I don't think it was a mistake. I think they are out in the open all right.
Duly noted. However, I disagree with your application of Occam's razor.
You think it was a cover up, or that I just don't understand Occam's razor?
I think your faith in the WEF is misplaced. Anyway, Occam's razor is basically a logical fallacy. Occam, the godfather of Nominalism, is one of the great villains of intellectual history. It's interesting that you only saw two alternatives. I'll leave it at that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor#Controversial_aspects
Ahhh....I learn something everyday. Thanks.
Before I leap to outrage about a luciferase tag, let's have some proof. It's extremely simple to do. Just take a blood sample from a vaccinated person and add luciferase substrate. The blood should glow in the dark. After all, if they did use luciferase as a tag, it was done BECAUSE it's so simple. There should be hundreds of millions of tagged people by now, and it would be easy to prove all around the globe.
Furthermore, a tag works both ways. It tags both the vaccinated person, AND it tags the vaccine maker who put it in there. This will be the story of the century it it's true - definitive proof of the great reset! Somehow I'm skeptical.
And while we're on the topic, why the hell doesn't some just take a vial of vaccine and analyze it? To hell with legal agreements and patents. To use a famous phrase, the public has a right to know. Show us the luciferase, the lipid nanoparticles, the graphene, the mRNA, and sequence the mRNA. Show it all!
It's completely implausible that the vaccine makers would put all this alleged stuff in there and actually expect that no one would ever find out. I'm tired of being trolled by right wingers who fail to come up with the goods. Every time I see one of these stories now, I immediately ask, what's wrong with this?
On the other hand, just think of the upside if someone does prove that the vaccines have been monkeyed with. ER is either a fool or a GOAT. The test is simple. Do it!!
People put conspiratorial explanations to to Covid policy, and I can understand that, but I still think that a lot of this is just malignant stupidity. The people who created the vaccines thought they were a way to rid us of Covid, and the proof of this is that they withheld the news until after the election in the hope of inuring Trump politically. The problem is that the jab isn't working out and may be worse than the disease, but they have sunk too much credibility into this to back off now. So they double down. And again. Given time, they may start injecting this crap into the wombs of pregnant women.
“The Devil’s greatest trick was convincing the world he doesn’t exist.” - Anonymous
I was reading a blog post earlier today that mentioned that by vaccinating kids it changes the liability of the Government to not being liable. I think it was NCVIA and something else. As I understood it, once they vaccinate the kids the vaccines were in a different state of liability to protect the Government. I'm probably confused.
Issued under the EUA neither the government nor the drug company can be held liable.
As between luciferase and hudra vulgaris I suppose I'd take the luciferase.