Luciferase? Huh?

Have you noticed that the Global Establishment and its sub-units all the way down to the state and local level here in the US are manicly obsessed with getting the world to Klaus Schwab’s goal—100% injection of the world population? Including little kids? I know you’ve noticed. Now consider some data points …

Here in IL the survival rate for young people 20 years old and under is: 99.991%. How small a risk does Covid present to that demographic? An article at American Thinker today puts it succinctly, quoting the NYT:

Thus, most – if not all – of the children in the 5-11 age bracket who died while being Covid positive suffered from serious, life-threatening co-morbidities.

To state the situation in a different way, it is virtually unheard of for an active, healthy child to die of Covid-19. For all practical purposes, the chance of your healthy child’s dying of this disease is zero.

Even the scare-mongering New York Times had to concede that to healthy children “the danger of severe Covid is so low as to be difficult to quantify.” In other words, the risk is essentially non-existent.

The obvious question is this: Why are we going to mass vaccinate healthy children against Covid-19 given that they face virtually no serious risk from this particular disease?

That’s four different ways of expressing the same concept: Vaxxing kids is pointless. Vax injuries (which include death) are more of a threat to young people—especially males. The author thinks it’s all about money, which is a pretty reasonable surmise when you look at the amounts Big Pharma is raking in. Nevertheless, I’m an open minded guy. We know Big Pharma worships—among other things—money, but there could be more going on here. After all, Big Pharma couldn’t be doing this without powerful enablers.

Along similar lines—the scare tactics being deployed to try to induce people to get their kids injected—is this article:

Italian Institute of Health Drastically Reduces Its Official COVID Death Toll Number

Changes defintiion of COVID death from ‘with COVID’ to ‘by COVID’.

How drastic is a “drastic” reduction?

97% drastic. And that doesn’t even take into account the degree to which the Italian health system was totally unprepared to deal with Covid. Details:

The Italian Higher Institute of Health has drastically reduced the country’s official COVID death toll number by over 97 per cent after changing the definition of a fatality to someone who died from COVID rather than with COVID.

Italian newspaper Il Tempo reports that the Institute has revised downward the number of people who have died from COVID rather than with COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000.

“Yes, you read that right. Turns out 97.1% of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid,” writes Toby Young.

Of the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.

“All the other Italians who lost their lives had from between one and five pre-existing diseases. Of those aged over 67 who died, 7% had more than three co-morbidities, and 18% at least two,” writes Young.

“According to the Institute, 65.8% of Italians who died after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension (high blood pressure), 23.5% had dementia, 29.3% had diabetes, and 24.8% atrial fibrillation. Add to that, 17.4% had lung problems, 16.3% had had cancer in the last five years and 15.7% suffered from previous heart failures.”

The Institute’s new definition of a COVID death means that COVID has killed fewer people in Italy than (whisper it) the average bout of seasonal flu.

If a similar change were made by other national governments, the official COVID death toll would be cut by a margin of greater than 90 per cent.

We know for a fact that in the US hospitals are essentially paid by the government to come up with Covid as a cause of hospitalization and/or death. Our official stats have been cooked, just as well and truly as official stats in the old Soviet Union and in current China are.

Nevertheless the Branch Covidian cultists persist. Consider this degree of desperation:

Joe Biden Hits a New Low as the Administration Takes a Baseball Bat to Middle-Class Americans

The new low is 37% approval, and under anything resembling normal circumstances that kind of a new low would prompt a “drastic” change of course. But no:

Did you get all that? With the supply chain crisis crushing middle-Americans, Biden has decided to grab a baseball bat and break their knees in the process. The idea that nuking truck drivers over vaccine mandates won’t further collapse the supply chain is asinine. It’s also a completely unnecessary action even if you believe that vaccine mandates are a good thing (I don’t, but to play devil’s advocate). Truck drivers ride in trucks by themselves all day. There is no logic behind a mandate at all.

But as I’ve said many times during this entire ordeal, vaccine mandates aren’t about science. After all, everyone spreads COVID so you aren’t going to end the pandemic with vaccines nor do you need to “protect” the vaccinated from the unvaccinated. No, this is all about power. Biden and his leftwing cohorts get their high off of making Americans jump when they command.

Here’s what I say. This deranged behavior couldn’t possibly be happening without pressure from ueber-powerful people who are not required to run for election. This is behavior from politicians such as we’ve never seen before. That’s why I say it can’t be just about money—no amount of campaign contributions from Big Pharma can fix a 37% approval rating.

I think we can also agree that it’s not about science—certainly not medical science.

That leaves power. And Luciferase is part of that mix.

Emerald Robinson has a Substack post (h/t my Dutch friend) about her adventures with Luciferase, which led to her being suspended from Twitter. This is the Tweet that offended the Branch Covidians at Twitter:

What ER does in her post is simply describe her very basic research into the contents of the Moderna injection. She found Luciferase included in the Moderna patent application. Here’s the bottom line to which ER is pointing:

Luciferase is an enzyme that can produce bioluminescence. (It can make things glow, basically.) That’s why Luciferase is commonly used in the biomedical industry. It’s used to tag very tiny things like cells or proteins so that you can track them.

It tags things so you can track them.

Was Luciferase listed as an ingredient in the COVID vaccines by Big Pharma? No it was not. (You can check here at the CDC website.) So the next question becomes: why would Big Pharma not disclose that Luciferase is an ingredient in the vaccines - since it’s clearly listed (in at least one patent from one company) as being used?

The reason is rather ominous: Big Pharma has big plans for Luciferase and Big Government has big plans for it too. The U.S. military’s technology arm DARPA is currently fighting with Moderna over the ownership of the COVID vaccine because DARPA has “funded an implantable biochip” that could be used “to deploy” it:

…

Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to tag and track people. The once free nations of the West are testing a new authoritarian system of total control under the guise of public health. Just look at Australia or New Zealand or Canada or Italy to see how basic civil rights have been suspended indefinitely and a pseudo-medical tyranny has been installed. The Great Reset is being implemented with the lie that it’s all about “protecting your health.” Our military and intelligence agencies are not confronting China — they're copying China. A totalitarian nightmare is being imported into free countries through surveillance technologies.

You don’t have to be a Christian to understand that such technology will be used to build a global surveillance state. The vaccine mandates have already led to vaccine passports. The vaccine passports are basically QR codes to track you by connecting to your smartphone. This will inevitably lead very soon to biometric ID embedded into your body. You won’t be able to enter restaurants or buy groceries or go to work without it.

I won’t pretend to understand all the technology, but it is fact that governments would probably like to move beyond smart phone tracking (think: January 6 Event) to something more fool proof—like biometric ID. To me, ER’s surmise is perfectly reasonable. It also explains the totally counter-intuitive—in traditional political terms—push by our ruling class to force injection mandates down the throats of the populace, by hook or by crook.

If the push to inject kids who totally aren’t at risk doesn’t tell you enough, consider this:

President-elect MPG @MPG37685458

@RWMaloneMD Did you see this? researchgate.net/publication/35…

I’ll wrap this up with a few excerpts from an article at the von Mises Institute, republished at Zerohedge:

Plans Of A Technocratic Elite: 'The Great Reset' Is Not A Conspiracy Theory

It should be abundantly clear that the research into biometric IDs—tag and trace—fits right in with the goals of the Great Reset. Build Back Better means Tear It All Down First. Starting with our constitutional order:

Many positive developments may come from the 4-IR, but unless it is taken out of the hands of the corporate-socialist technocrats, it will constitute a virtual prison.

Under the Great Reset governance model, states and favored corporations form “public-private partnerships” in control of governance. The configuration yields a corporate-state hybrid largely unaccountable to the constituents of national governments.

… This usurpation has led political scientist Ivan Wecke to call the WEF’s governmental redesign of the world system “a corporate takeover of global governance.”

This is true, but the obverse is also the case. The WEF model also represents the governmentalization of private industry. Under Schwab’s “stakeholder capitalism” and the multistakeholder governance model, governance is not only increasingly privatized, but also and more importantly, corporations are deputized as major additions to governments and intergovernmental bodies. The state is thereby extended, enhanced, and augmented by the addition of enormous corporate assets.

We see the deputization of corporations already in the US with the mandates. It’s explicitly unconstitutional, but they’re trying to push it through.

Over the past twenty-one months, the response to the covid-19 scourge has consolidated the monopolistic corporations’ grip on the economy on top, while advancing “actually-existing socialism” below. In partnership with Big Tech, Big Pharma, the legacy media, national and international health agencies, and compliant populations, hitherto “democratic” Western states are increasingly being transformed into totalitarian regimes modeled after China, seemingly overnight. I need not provide a litany of the tyranny and abuses. You can read about them on alternative news sites—until you can no longer read about them even there.

The Great Reset, then, is not merely a conspiracy theory; it is an open, avowed, and planned project, and it is well underway. But because capitalism with Chinese characteristics, or corporate-socialist statism, lacks free markets and depends on the absence of free will and individual liberty, it is, ironically, “unsustainable,” and doomed to fail. The question is just how much suffering and distortion will be endured until it does.