10 Comments
User's avatar
Manul's avatar

How about they have DC too!

Expand full comment
johnycomelately's avatar

Elijah Interfaith Institute’s 10 Spiritual Principles for Climate Repentance, Abrahamic Accords, Noahide Laws, UAE’s Abrahamic Family House Multi Faith Centre, Papal Ecumenism etc.

Makes one wonder about Jerusalem’s role in globalist syncretism.

Expand full comment
Texas Khaan's avatar

Very likely will not end well,

for the state of Israhell.

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

You are so right. Iran always had Putinesque restraint. "Please evacuate that air force base because we are about to demonstrate that you can not stop our weapons." With Erdogan, the gloves are off.

Expand full comment
Lyon's avatar

This is funny!

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

This was so easy to see coming--and that eftsoons or right speedily. That's why I wrote yesterday that Macgregor couldn't be more wrong that to suppose that there was a "joint Turkish Israeli hegemony in the Middle East."

Is the US really going to try to confront Turkey if Turkey decides to move down to the Golan? With what? Turkey has by far the second biggest military in NATO--and they also have the S-400 AD system. Not to mention, Pakistan is reported to have offered to loan them some nukes.

It may be time to rethink who the winners and losers are in Syria.

Typical Neocon own goal is what it looks like.

Expand full comment
Ray-SoCa's avatar

Russia is only party avoiding negative consequences so far.

Israel by seizing more Syrian land and attacks is a huge, continuing negative PR hit for Erdogen,

Expand full comment
D F Barr's avatar

Kind of puts a lie to a unified NATO. What a mess. Thanks Brandon.

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

What happens to Article 5 if Netanyahu attacks Turkey?

Expand full comment
Brother Ass's avatar

I grab me some popcorn.

Expand full comment