46 Comments
User's avatar
Steghorn21's avatar

It's quite mind-boggling what is happening in Gaza right now. A million Palestinians already evacuating from the north of the strip. Where are they going to? What happens to their land when it is empty? I can't answer the first question, but suspect I know the answer to the second one. As someone memed about the vax effects, it's beginning to look a lot like genocide.

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Informative and enlightening posts Mark. And in spite of years of diplomatic activity with Ross working behind the scenes, from GHWB down through Clinton and Obama, it’s come to this tragic conflagration. Putin says we just don’t listen: we come to the table with a pre-crafted solution and impose it on the parties at loggerheads. No wonder “peace” fails us. For years now, we haven’t even practiced diplomacy, feeling certain the world was our oyster and we could stride the globe at our pleasure. And now, of course, we’ve been toxic to Ukraine, because Nato! and the Neocon thrust to destabilize and now, it is evident, deceive Ukraine into thinking it can win a war against Russia. We’ve let matters slide even further with Israel - here Crooke’s comments are particularly illuminating. The Palestinian question festers still, inside an Israeli society similarly divided and seemingly engaged in a cold civil war. Who was it who said you can only make peace with your enemies? But then, do we want peace?

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Just as an addendum, Mercouris delves into Putin’s offer to Israel of Russian mediation, delivered in an address in Tashkent (I think) - Putin says the Americans have failed to deliver and it would be a historic mistake, along the lines of the siege of Leningrad (a/k/a St Petersburg, Putin’s birthplace) to proceed with a similar siege of Gaza. Mercouris at his best: 24 min mark onward…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4wSoEsMJo6A&list=UUwGpHa6rMLjSSCBlckm5khw&index=1&pp=iAQB

Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

I can imagine Biden, the guy who added foreign policy gravitas to the Obama ticket in 2008, speaking to this moment by alluding to the siege of Scranton by the Cornpeople.

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Apparently 60 Min still gives him airtime for that!

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Obviously our Deep State is in a state of deep alarm. Macgregor was saying we really, really don't want a big war. This may be part of a bid to get everyone to de-escalate. I hope.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Zhou bluffing with elections upcoming or Zhou thinking he'll be ready to use when ready?

Expand full comment
Hal's avatar

Will an alliance between a great power (US) and a small nation, Israel (with nuclear weapons) once again draw the great powers into a global cataclysm? President Biden has it under control.

Expand full comment
jo blo's avatar

The Mizrahi seem to have the upper hand these days: The "Settlers" are already skirmishing with the Fatah/Sunni bunch in the West Bank. Israel could be facing a three-front war--Gaza to the west, Lebanon (Hezbollah) to the north and, of course, the West Bank to the east.

Reportedly, Israel is running low (as is the US) on weaponry and are having to scrounge up stuff fom here and there. HMmm....kinda like that beleagured entity on the Black Sea.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

and for that we'll move 2 aircraft carrier groups to the eastern Mediterranean.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Put that together with what Bertrand is saying.

Expand full comment
Yancey Ward's avatar

I also believe the Israelis and most of the West are over-estimating the strength of the IDF versus these militia armies. Yes, the Israelis will have a big advantage in the air, but I bet Hezbollah probably has some Russian air defense systems by this point in time- that could be a real surprise to everyone.

Will the US be able to bluff Hezbollah into staying on the sidelines or will the bluff the called. And is it a bluff or not? We live in interesting times.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Most of those "over-estimating the strength of the IDF" must be confused with the IOF.

Expand full comment
T. Paine Redux's avatar

Ground fighting in MOUT ( military operation on urban terrain) terrain tends to minimize advantages. IDF will suffer greatly if they attack Gaza all out. Friends of mine fought in Fallujah. All the skill in the world doesn’t mean as much.

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

My belief is that the air wing of the IDF is probably about the most professional. What I've read re Hezbollah's anti-air capabilities--and this could be dated--is that it's good enough to force Israeli planes to fly at higher altitudes and/or greater distances from their targets than they would prefer. So it's something that the IDF has to take into account and it does affect their tactics. At a minimum. That's the fixed wing aspect. With helicopters it could be more dangerous.

Expand full comment
D F Barr's avatar

I did not have WWIII in the Middle East on my bingo card for 2023. What a long strange trip it’s been.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Good. Leave it off.

Expand full comment
Yancey Ward's avatar

No one did. Everyone distracted by Ukraine versus Russia match.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Now we're distracted FROM the Ukraine versus Russia match, Yancy. What are they going to throw to distract us from this one?

Expand full comment
Candis's avatar

That's what I've been wondering. Hamas had to have some idea of the reaction that they would provoke. It's obvious that Hamas has had a great deal of help and resources from outside entities. Hamas may well have a larger, unexpectedly well constructed plan for dealing with the result of their original provocation going forward. Step B, so to speak. Cocksure Israel, long used to dealing with a historically shortsighted Hamas, may not at all understand what they are marching into. Kind of like they didn't see what was coming.

Expand full comment
Hal's avatar

Great point. Provoke and ambush. Draw IDF in and when they are heavily engaged Hezbollah, radicals from Syria, etc. attack. Multi-front war. Hamas pulls the IDF into the urban environment where their advantages are minimized and perhaps it is a plain infantry fight that could be prolonged and costly. Drain their manpower, equipment, ammunition, and morale. If the attack into Israel was sophisticated and required a lot of training and preparation they could very well have the same in terms of defense waiting for the IDF. A repeat of the Ukrainians battering themselves to pieces against the Russian defenses? How much damage can the IDF absorb and still be ready for other attacks from multiple fronts? Of course if we have two carrier air wings in the Eastern Med and at least one in the Indian Ocean then perhaps that will give pause to anyone moving large formations of troops toward Israel. But then how vulnerable are the carriers?

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

For Hamas it was now or never. With the West Bank settlers on the rampage, no serious peace talks in sight, and no help from their Arab "brothers", they probably realised that there won't be a Palestinian element in Israel within 20 years. Nothing much to lose.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Yeah, I don't get it why Hamas was the chosen one on behalf of the Muslim/Arab world to spark a reaction from Israel based on transitioning the Mosque to a Temple. What does Hamas get out of it? Nothing good so far. Where's the rest of the Muslim/Arab world ready and willing to bail them out? Hezbollah? C'mon man. Gotta be more than that.

Expand full comment
Yancey Ward's avatar

There was a theory going around this morning- a rumor perhaps- that Hamas expected to be battling the IDF and other security forces and never expected to face so little armed opposition when they broke through the security fences, and then got carried away in barbarity.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Sunday morning news cycles making Saturday rounds.

Expand full comment
Candis's avatar

That's totally possible as well.

Expand full comment
Ray-SoCa's avatar

Insightful article about food that explains a lot of Israeli culture:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02757206.2023.2261965

Ashkenazi Is more Labor, and is out of power. They are seen as naive on their views of the Palestinians by the majority now.

Col. Tom Kratman had a similar comment (if I remember correctly) on the Israeli military capabilities. He feels they are over rated, since they only bested 3rd rate armies (Arab). And the Israeli heavy use of reserves reduces their capabilities, due to training, verses professional / full time soldiers.

Russians make up 15% of the Israeli population now.

Ultra orthodox is another faction, I’ve no idea how they figure into Israeli politics. Seem Ashkenazi ethnically.

Swag:

Most kid’s families that were attending the peace rave were richer, more liberal. Their targeting is having a huge impact due to friends and families of the victims and survivors.

Part of the Israel government is trying to downplay the Hamas atrocities. They are afraid of the impact on public opinion. I’ve no idea on the politics behind this inside the government. Who benefits?

Crooke has better connections with Ashkenazi in Israel, and his writing reflects that.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

the "D" in IDF does not stand for offensive last I remember. they always call up "reserves" in times like these. Military training is an obligation for all based on their age.

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

"the Israeli heavy use of reserves reduces their capabilities,"

I've read that many times over the years.

"Russians make up 15% of the Israeli population now."

But 100% of butchers illegally selling pork.

Ultra orthodox Ashkenazi would include elements opposed to the state of Israel as such.

Expand full comment
Ray-SoCa's avatar

Seems “white meat” is legal per their Supreme Court.

https://www.atlantajewishtimes.com/pork-in-israel-reflects-clash-of-cultures/

A Chinese family my wife knows, worked for an airline, mentioned how they would get illegal pork in Iran. Chinese are big into pork.

Expand full comment
D F Barr's avatar

Did not know that. Never thought of Israel having the different ethnic groups.

Expand full comment
Neely Arnold's avatar

I really like your writing! A huge thank you for links to the events and historical figures and background that I had very little or no knowledge of. I look forward to reading more.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

You do know about curiosity, don't you?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Joking. Of course.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Gavin, I don't allow advocacy for war crimes here.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 15, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Good points.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 15, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

Thank you for the history lesson!

To perhaps excuse the military strategists, they have matured in a residually Christian culture which carries forward the idea that “Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.” Christians haven't had a must-not-be-defiled holy site... ever. Not even Rome, then or now.

Would it be fair to say that our faith teaches us that the second Temple was destroyed according to God's will, and there is nothing in our understanding of our duty to God that requires us to help build a third Temple? Likewise, our faith teaches us to reject absolute claims on holy sites, let alone dividing the physical world between dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb?

We are to not deny Christ; there is nothing in our scripture about denying entry to a particular physical location in this City of Man, outside of protecting the innocent.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Crooke has been making this point for quite some time, no doubt based on his experience. From listening to him in the past I believe he does have a religious grounding. The problem that he calls lack of empathy is what I call the ideological mindset, which has beset the West since the late Middle Ages. In its origins it's Platonic. It arises from viewing the real world as no more than a set of ideas to be manipulated. That includes human beings. This has become second nature in the West and leads to lack of empathy. But it is also the mindset behind many other world views--the West is far from alone in this regard. Hamas and fundamentalist Zionism are examples among many. I talk about this extensively in my pre-2018 posting.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Elleke Wilms's avatar

Yeah, that's such a enigma to me: "...the United States I thought I knew and understood..." I am an ardent James Baldwin fan and his description of the United States are the raw, objective, harsh, painful, etc. facts. It seems that many decades after all his writing and speeching and death, it is finally coming full circle: the end of the US dynasty that has been decades in the making. I'd say Thank God and lets finally get a full horrific view of what the US is about, and then lets decide to give peace a chance!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 14, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

If you're willing to hold cabinet meetings in the basement of the 3rd most important Muslim Mosque then aren't you already in a "stronger" position?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 14, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

with an election 13 months away I can't imagine Zhou would want to put the US in a role to spark WW3. Zhou' administration passivity lives on IMO. Look at Jake the snakes' Sullivan's hubris driven Mideast comments on September 29th.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2023/10/israel-war-middle-east-jake-sullivan/675580/

Expand full comment
letterwriter's avatar

If Biden were in command of his role that might be so, but I suspect that there is rather a set of people with their own aims and without the constraints which aiming at reelection places on one. And I imagine some of these are not primarily devoted to duty to a 2nd term for Biden in part, or, they may think the election is in the bag anyway.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

With the MSM onboard probably won't take much to push "our patriotic duty".

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

You are wrong, the most dangerous religion are the radical secular progressives who want to eradicate the vast majority and no religion be spared. These are the aspirant gods who will usher in OWG and the transhuman future.

Expand full comment