My supposition is that the Dems think this will be a big "boost" for them--as saviors of the country. Color me very skeptical. The polling isn't there, and especially re young people.
El Gato Malo has been referring to what he calls Bayesian data crimes for quite a while. By lumping cases, hospitalizations, and deaths incurred up to 14 days after the first jab into the "unvaxxed" category, the data is hopelessly corrupted. Obviously this was done purposefully. This has been going on since early days. It is why those with two jabs appeared to fare better than those with one. It is why the boosters appeared to be effective. If the downside effects of jabs (increased susceptibility to the virus, death) are backdated onto the prior vaccination state's ledger for 14 days, each new jab can appear beneficial.
As EGM says, the problem is that to get to each subsequent jab's protective foxhole you have to take the jab, stand up, leave your current foxhole's protection, and run across no man's land for 14 days. Obviously, logically, that exposure risk should be attributed to each new jab state--not the prior state.
But even with the data corruption it's becoming apparent what's really going on. It can't be hidden. And that will become even more apparent as we get more of the mortality data.
I agree. I also, however, agree with your assessment of Alexander's clumsiness of presentation in the referenced Substack ("Unfortunately, I find the information rather awkwardly presented"). We sometimes forget how few Americans know that alternative analyses of official data even exist, let alone understand the nuances and the subterfuges being perpetrated. That means that Team Reality really needs to work at making their expositions as clear as can be. If you and I found it thick, imagine sending it to your mother to convince her to abstain from getting boosted.
Meanwhile news just gets worse. https://metatron.substack.com/p/scientific-proof-that-the-mrna-causes?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Yikes!!!
Heavily boosted Biden has rebound Covid!
https://instapundit.com/534354/
Yep, my wife just told me. Which kinda plays into this post, right?
It’s a major blow to the official Covid Narrative:
1. Deadliness of Covid
2. Effectiveness of masks
3. Need for Boosters.
4. Effectiveness of the Paxlovid treatment.
It reduces substantially the potential for midterm Covid Fear Porn.
It may be an inflection point, when Covid became a part of normal life.
And the next booster shot will be pushed right before the mid terms…
My supposition is that the Dems think this will be a big "boost" for them--as saviors of the country. Color me very skeptical. The polling isn't there, and especially re young people.
El Gato Malo has been referring to what he calls Bayesian data crimes for quite a while. By lumping cases, hospitalizations, and deaths incurred up to 14 days after the first jab into the "unvaxxed" category, the data is hopelessly corrupted. Obviously this was done purposefully. This has been going on since early days. It is why those with two jabs appeared to fare better than those with one. It is why the boosters appeared to be effective. If the downside effects of jabs (increased susceptibility to the virus, death) are backdated onto the prior vaccination state's ledger for 14 days, each new jab can appear beneficial.
As EGM says, the problem is that to get to each subsequent jab's protective foxhole you have to take the jab, stand up, leave your current foxhole's protection, and run across no man's land for 14 days. Obviously, logically, that exposure risk should be attributed to each new jab state--not the prior state.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine
But even with the data corruption it's becoming apparent what's really going on. It can't be hidden. And that will become even more apparent as we get more of the mortality data.
I agree. I also, however, agree with your assessment of Alexander's clumsiness of presentation in the referenced Substack ("Unfortunately, I find the information rather awkwardly presented"). We sometimes forget how few Americans know that alternative analyses of official data even exist, let alone understand the nuances and the subterfuges being perpetrated. That means that Team Reality really needs to work at making their expositions as clear as can be. If you and I found it thick, imagine sending it to your mother to convince her to abstain from getting boosted.
Great news about the health care workers settlement!