Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lawrence L.'s avatar

El Gato Malo has been referring to what he calls Bayesian data crimes for quite a while. By lumping cases, hospitalizations, and deaths incurred up to 14 days after the first jab into the "unvaxxed" category, the data is hopelessly corrupted. Obviously this was done purposefully. This has been going on since early days. It is why those with two jabs appeared to fare better than those with one. It is why the boosters appeared to be effective. If the downside effects of jabs (increased susceptibility to the virus, death) are backdated onto the prior vaccination state's ledger for 14 days, each new jab can appear beneficial.

As EGM says, the problem is that to get to each subsequent jab's protective foxhole you have to take the jab, stand up, leave your current foxhole's protection, and run across no man's land for 14 days. Obviously, logically, that exposure risk should be attributed to each new jab state--not the prior state.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine

Expand full comment
Athena's avatar

Great news about the health care workers settlement!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts