25 Comments
User's avatar
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Governor fat boy response this morning. Says nothing of significance. What a piece of ...

https://foxillinois.com/news/local/gov-pritzkers-statement-on-fair-and-free-elections

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

I'm personally interested in the Russia Hoax documents and the role of the Pulitzer prize winning MSM involvement.

Expand full comment
Stephen McIntyre's avatar

Order only applies to so-called binder. The binder was prepared by antagonistic DOJ during transition. It nearly entirely consists of recycling already available information. This order is going to be a disappointment.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

But will Pam Bondi be the one to release it? She built up the Epstein files release so well!

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

What do you think is up? This is supposed to be "immediate". Could there be further releases later or is this some sort of cover up--and if so, why?

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

Aaron Maté @aaronjmate

Yet an unspecified "classified annex" is still being withheld. I'm assuming they mean the classified annex to the January 2017 "intelligence community assessment" -- falsely said to reflect an IC consensus, when it was in fact drafted by a handful of people under the watch of Russiagate fraudster John Brennan. If that's being withheld, then that's a shame. No reason to keep shielding this seismic fraud.

Update: meh. Low-hanging fruit.

Quote

Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke

Turns out we got our hopes up too soon. The announcement said all Crossfire Hurricane FBI files would be released, but the order only covers the binder—material that’s not terribly significant and was slated for release years ago anyway. This isn’t going to move the needle.

Expand full comment
LaMaisonGelat's avatar

The Carbon EO was genius...

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

OT re Russia

Statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with media reports regarding the future of the Zaporizhzhya NPP

[[[ Provides answer to all of EU nutty professors claiming Russia territory is temporary or will be shared ]]]

"Zaporizhzhya NPP is a Russian nuclear facility. Following the referendums held at the end of September 2022, the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporizhzhya regions became part of the Russian Federation as full-fledged subjects. On October 5, 2022, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 711 "On the specifics of legal regulation in the field of atomic energy use in the territory of the Zaporizhzhya region" was signed, securing the status of Zaporizhzhya NPP as a facility under Russian jurisdiction."

"The idea of ​​any international organizations participating in the operation of the station also seems absurd,"

- Appears Russia feels they have to put a stop to the quacks in the US spreading propaganda

https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/2005359/

Expand full comment
TomA's avatar

This is especially bad news for Britain. They are on the cusp of a financial crisis due to enormous sovereign debt and concurrent budget deficits that will soon trigger a major default if not remedied by severe cuts in spending. They were counting on Ukraine being a source of income to help postpone this debacle, and likely the ZNPP was part of that calculus. Starmer's panic will only increase as negotiations between the US and Russia will further result in announcements such as this and expose the reality that exploiting Ukraine is no longer feasible.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

They were counting on Ukraine being a source of income

eg: Countries like France too

February 2024

In Paris, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Emmanuel Macron signed the Agreement on security cooperation between Ukraine and France

"According to the document, in 2024, the French Republic will allocate up to €3 billion in military aid and will continue to support Ukraine over the ten-year duration of this agreement."

So what was France getting in return - it all appears secret - but it all appears promises of resources - of which it appears there will be none

I cannot imagine there was no agreement that would benefit France and imagine there was one that is a ' state secret ' unless Macron is even more stupid then I think he is, but I think he is pretty stupid, but not that stupid but maybe

https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/u-parizhi-volodimir-zelenskij-ta-emmanuel-makron-pidpisali-u-89013#:~:text=During%20a%20working%20visit%20to,Vilnius%20on%20July%2012%2C%202023.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

I wonder how Starmer thought that massively increasing defence spending while cutting social security would go down well with the plebs. Even the Brits have limits to their tolerance.

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

Do you sense he even cares? The long spoken lie about progressives is always been they care and they rely on the press to advance the lie while smearing their political foes as uncaring beasts. Always with the lies.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Absolutely not. He is serving his masters in the City and MI6 and that is all that matters to him.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Good news! I'm sure an activist judge will try and block these, but let's hope Trump ignores them.

Expand full comment
D F Barr's avatar

National security. Sources and methods. Blah. Blah. Blah.

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Wonder if that activist judge is named Boasberg (as in Boa?!) - none other than he of Fisa Court fame? As Cardigan would say, please pass the popcorn and don’t forget the salt!

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

He’s a Bolshevik judge. They use the law to punish those they disagree with and hate.

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

Live in a state that uses QR codes to transmit my votes into the scanner QR reader, so am unable to verify the votes I made are indeed transmitted.

Love this eo!

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

I think you voted for Kamala, Doubting! :)

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

Right!??? And yet our SOS says the QR code system (dominion) meets the state law requiring voters to be able to visually confirm the ballot reflects their vote choice (how is beyond me), and we have lawsuits a plenty that get stuck in judicial malaise. Time to move?

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

You are aptly named, DT!

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

Is it a gift? Or curse? Once we see the truth cannot unsee it.

Expand full comment
Nutmeg's avatar

Isn't the key issue now whether an election is decided by counting ballots or counting votes (depends on the state)? Expand the EO to include proof of citizenship with every ballot.

Expand full comment
Doubting T.'s avatar

Makes sense re citizens only voting as part of EO - a no brainer; it took a simple EO to do what no one in our state has been able to do for years

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Yup, it’s just like the border, and the two are related - a huge “grift machine” for the Dims. Let masses of migrants pour in over a non-existent border, sign them up to drive and to vote - and never ask for ID, ie proof of citizenship! Et voilà! thus ensuring Dims retain power.

Expand full comment