12 Comments
User's avatar
Sarcastic Cynical Texan's avatar

Did anyone besides me notice the male to female ratio in the North Dakota birth report? While it is normal for more males than females to be born the difference is nowhere near that large. Very suspicious indeed folks.

Expand full comment
Candis's avatar

It's very interesting, for sure.

Expand full comment
George Dixon's avatar

Eugenics has been the driving force behind abortion for over 100 years. The purpose of birth control is "to create a race of thoroughbreds," Margaret Sanger Founder of Planned Parenthood Nov. 1921. "More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control."
Margaret Sanger. Democratic Party eugenics also has a strong racial component. "We do not want word to go out that we want to ext**minat* the N[Black] population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Margaret Sanger. The attitudes of Sanger were not a one-off. In 2009 SCOTUS Justice Ginsburg wrote: “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Ginsburg never identified who comprised the "populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” However comparing the positions which Sanger and Ginsburg espoused makes it clear which population they referred to.

Expand full comment
Sarcastic Cynical Texan's avatar

Creating a race of thoroughbreds, that really worked out well for the equines, and for families like the Windsors. INBREEDS !!!

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

The key for Ginsburg was that overturning the Hyde amendment would have led to *Medicaid* funding for abortion--which she obviously favored. That's a fairly broad hint.

Expand full comment
Lawrence L.'s avatar

So, the plan is to kill off the educated (I use that word loosely) first world population that presents the greatest risk to them. They are still going to need drones to do the remaining manual jobs that robots haven't yet replaced (plumber, electrician, etc.). But robots don't micturate or defecate. And they probably won't live in what we would consider housing. The transhumans will likely be weaker, stupider, and less efficient than the pure AI. Oh to be a fly on the wall when the robots figure out the elite transhumans are no longer necessary.

Expand full comment
Alabama Living's avatar

Dr. Malone wrote:

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/immune-imprinting-comirnaty-and-omicron-520

In part 1 he stated that BA.4 & 5 are spreading, but it's unknown if it's a stronger or weaker virus? Here we go again in a new rabbit hole. The BS isn't palpable any longer. It doesn't mention fertility rates, but we'll know soon enough.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 26, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Ray-SoCa's avatar

Forbes - I’m not sure.

6 months ago I would have agreed with you.

With all the lies on Covid, and the fubar covid fda trials, and now the push to vax babies, I’m not sure what to believe.

After the jab, There is a definite immediate impact right after vaccination on fertility. And if you are pregnant, a huge increase in death of fetus (not sure on the right word).

And the impact of the vax seems to increase with each shot.

I’ll see if I ever become a grandfather. My daughter did not think it was a big thing, and got the jab even though she had already had Covid, so she could travel. I found out after the fact. At least no boosters for anyone in my immediate family.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 26, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Sarcastic Cynical Texan's avatar

Gates the greedy grinner must be thrilled by the success of his philanthropy . . . or pathology, or philandering?

Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

We thought we were getting philanthropy, but instead we got misanthropy. :(

Expand full comment
Tamsin's avatar

Melinda has been the "beard" for Bill.

Expand full comment