I wonder if on this national day of visibility they are searching out future school shooters who are out being visible? Probably not. Happy Easter to all of you.
Can anyone doubt that we are in the midst of a full-on Bolshevik revolution? For anyone who doubts me, I shall remind them that today is not Easter Sunday, a day filled with the promise of new life and salvation, but National Transgender Visibility Day.
That’s absolutely true. It’s the inmates running the asylum and they don’t even try to make it look fair or rational anymore. You’re either on the right side of history or you’re not... but they are too blinded by their smug sense of superiority that they can’t see that they are the bad guys.
Amen to that, Cred. That's why, despite the insanity being ratcheted up on an almost daily basis now, none of this gets me down. There will be a Great Accounting in the very near future. Our job is to remember God and cling to what is good, beautiful and true while these demons ply their craft in vain.
The article references Texas Government Code §448.001, wherein antisemitism is defined, what is NOT mentioned is that genocide is also defined in that very same statute.
Governor/Emperor Greg Abbott I, are you engaging in outrageous executive overreach once again, like you were back in March 2020 ???
Q: is anyone writing about why this is happening now…worldwide? Why lack of trust now? Why so much fear? Have there been other times in the West/US when we experienced this? Yes. ‘’60s. ‘20s-‘30s (when the FBI became what we think of today). 1840s-50s. Think the swamping of cultures by the Telegraph, Radio and Television. Transition from one paradigm to the next. Likely the FBI is tasked with protecting what has been the dominant way, which is now obsolete. Mark, you can talk about this more fully.
DIGITAL, is destroying everything we have known, but there are no new rules yet…so the old ones get applied with more vigor…law, economics and politics always lag behind the changes roiling the people…what is causing this? Fear of DIGITAL replacing humans.
Columbia U, where Ms. Clinton now has a shingle, hosted a symposium this week on AI and the 2024 elections:
What is important is not what any of the panelists actually say, since they don’t understand anything. But the fact that they are screaming about this means it’s important. Eric Schmidt is interviewed during the last 30 mins, worth watching: psychological abuse is going to get much worse as AI gets better at persuading the humans…and until the humans decide to do something about it - they get it utterly wrong by looking at politics for an answer. What will happen is that the humans, not elites, will start pushing back (see Irish referendum rejection) and this will lead to attempts to understand what humans are and what they need to be doing in a world of ubiquitous artificial souls/decisions.
Who people vote for, means nothing at this point: need another generation to go by before that really changes - people hold onto the past, but they eventually get old, become irrelevant (as Ms. Clinton is now) and die…
Schmidt is right, it will take getting organized to get past the fear of AI and to different outcome.
If it was happing in some objective and transparent way that would be one thing... but it’s completely politicized. You can post anything you want about killing white people, burning a courthouse, beating a journalist and nothing happens, but criticize Zionism and you get the friendly knock knock. It’s crazy to see the new left gift the state with all the tools they had fought in the past, as if there will never be a swing of the pendulum back the other way. They believe so strongly in the end of history, in the inevitability of their total triumph that no lifeline to civil discourse or normalcy between neighbors is maintained. Mark my words: These tools will be used to absolutely crush the real left, and I’m going to have a hard time feeling sorry for anyone given how sadistic their discourse has become. I was a democrat my whole life and HATED the Bush II administration but now the democrats and the new left are even worse.
I watched that video yesterday and thought the whole episode was shocking. They looked like some folks going to the mall for lunch - I would question if they were legit. There was also something in the video where they said they had ID on their phones? They no longer carry a proper badge and photo ID? Is that supposed to make them appear casual and friendly? We know from the twitter files the Fed has a backdoor to all social media. The scary part is internet posts are ripe for incorrect interpretation; its becoming thought policing. The bias is against having a viewpoint that doesn't agree with the government narrative. If they're coming to your home over an internet post - they're sizing you up. As Mark said, threat assessment. These days, they play fast and loose with what - or who - they deem a threat.
Perhaps I was mistaken but once upon a time I had believed that the FBI's purpose was to investigate actions - more specifically, alleged criminal actions. When the government starts investigating people on the basis of their speech, and that alone, what they are really doing is investigating their thoughts i.e., what led to their speech. The implication is that thought itself can be a basis for criminal investigation even in the absence of associated action. That is not only 1984 scary, it is without any legal basis in our country, at least to my knowledge. Perhaps someone can find some statute to correct me...
My recollection from reading the article earlier this morning was that the lady told the FBI she had nothing to say to them and if they wanted to speak with her, it would be with her lawyer.
The FBI must have relaxed its dress code if the home security camera photos are to be believed.
I wonder if on this national day of visibility they are searching out future school shooters who are out being visible? Probably not. Happy Easter to all of you.
My guess the visit was a way to pad the number of hate crime investigations.
Same with the fbi visit in Louisiana:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/report-woman-visited-fbi-after-exposing-cousins-killer/
Can anyone doubt that we are in the midst of a full-on Bolshevik revolution? For anyone who doubts me, I shall remind them that today is not Easter Sunday, a day filled with the promise of new life and salvation, but National Transgender Visibility Day.
Cultural Marxism
"Cultural Marxism" is too abstract. This is getting very real and they no longer hide it.
That’s absolutely true. It’s the inmates running the asylum and they don’t even try to make it look fair or rational anymore. You’re either on the right side of history or you’re not... but they are too blinded by their smug sense of superiority that they can’t see that they are the bad guys.
For example. Did this guy get a visit from the FBI?
Megatron @Megatron_ron
Michigan Republican Representative Tim Walberg, on Gaza:
“We shouldn’t be spending a dime on humanitarian aid. It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick.”
Disgusting piece off s**t calling himself a Christian.
I'm sure the SWAT team are creeping up to his door as we speak...
Amen to that, Cred. That's why, despite the insanity being ratcheted up on an almost daily basis now, none of this gets me down. There will be a Great Accounting in the very near future. Our job is to remember God and cling to what is good, beautiful and true while these demons ply their craft in vain.
This little gem seems to be relevant right about now:
https://texasscorecard.com/state/gov-abbott-orders-universities-to-establish-penalties-for-antisemitic-rhetoric/
The article references Texas Government Code §448.001, wherein antisemitism is defined, what is NOT mentioned is that genocide is also defined in that very same statute.
Governor/Emperor Greg Abbott I, are you engaging in outrageous executive overreach once again, like you were back in March 2020 ???
I'm amazed he's got the energy to think about this stuff, what with his exhausting labours at the border...
Q: is anyone writing about why this is happening now…worldwide? Why lack of trust now? Why so much fear? Have there been other times in the West/US when we experienced this? Yes. ‘’60s. ‘20s-‘30s (when the FBI became what we think of today). 1840s-50s. Think the swamping of cultures by the Telegraph, Radio and Television. Transition from one paradigm to the next. Likely the FBI is tasked with protecting what has been the dominant way, which is now obsolete. Mark, you can talk about this more fully.
DIGITAL, is destroying everything we have known, but there are no new rules yet…so the old ones get applied with more vigor…law, economics and politics always lag behind the changes roiling the people…what is causing this? Fear of DIGITAL replacing humans.
Columbia U, where Ms. Clinton now has a shingle, hosted a symposium this week on AI and the 2024 elections:
https://www.youtube.com/live/GGH2O6gkUD0?si=1ZTyMg9sF1vFyZIT
What is important is not what any of the panelists actually say, since they don’t understand anything. But the fact that they are screaming about this means it’s important. Eric Schmidt is interviewed during the last 30 mins, worth watching: psychological abuse is going to get much worse as AI gets better at persuading the humans…and until the humans decide to do something about it - they get it utterly wrong by looking at politics for an answer. What will happen is that the humans, not elites, will start pushing back (see Irish referendum rejection) and this will lead to attempts to understand what humans are and what they need to be doing in a world of ubiquitous artificial souls/decisions.
Who people vote for, means nothing at this point: need another generation to go by before that really changes - people hold onto the past, but they eventually get old, become irrelevant (as Ms. Clinton is now) and die…
Schmidt is right, it will take getting organized to get past the fear of AI and to different outcome.
God bless all on this Easter Sunday.
Have you read Dark Futura by Simplius? It’s a substack about the menace of technology.
If it was happing in some objective and transparent way that would be one thing... but it’s completely politicized. You can post anything you want about killing white people, burning a courthouse, beating a journalist and nothing happens, but criticize Zionism and you get the friendly knock knock. It’s crazy to see the new left gift the state with all the tools they had fought in the past, as if there will never be a swing of the pendulum back the other way. They believe so strongly in the end of history, in the inevitability of their total triumph that no lifeline to civil discourse or normalcy between neighbors is maintained. Mark my words: These tools will be used to absolutely crush the real left, and I’m going to have a hard time feeling sorry for anyone given how sadistic their discourse has become. I was a democrat my whole life and HATED the Bush II administration but now the democrats and the new left are even worse.
I watched that video yesterday and thought the whole episode was shocking. They looked like some folks going to the mall for lunch - I would question if they were legit. There was also something in the video where they said they had ID on their phones? They no longer carry a proper badge and photo ID? Is that supposed to make them appear casual and friendly? We know from the twitter files the Fed has a backdoor to all social media. The scary part is internet posts are ripe for incorrect interpretation; its becoming thought policing. The bias is against having a viewpoint that doesn't agree with the government narrative. If they're coming to your home over an internet post - they're sizing you up. As Mark said, threat assessment. These days, they play fast and loose with what - or who - they deem a threat.
Perhaps I was mistaken but once upon a time I had believed that the FBI's purpose was to investigate actions - more specifically, alleged criminal actions. When the government starts investigating people on the basis of their speech, and that alone, what they are really doing is investigating their thoughts i.e., what led to their speech. The implication is that thought itself can be a basis for criminal investigation even in the absence of associated action. That is not only 1984 scary, it is without any legal basis in our country, at least to my knowledge. Perhaps someone can find some statute to correct me...
My recollection from reading the article earlier this morning was that the lady told the FBI she had nothing to say to them and if they wanted to speak with her, it would be with her lawyer.
The FBI must have relaxed its dress code if the home security camera photos are to be believed.
Maybe it's a recruitment tactic.