I agree with most of your article. Except the part about Putin wanting to preserve The Russia that communism took away? Putin was KGB and is in partnership with China to take control of the World. The US is all that stands in the way. China needs land for its billion as they have laid waste to theirs! Putin wants Europe and Germany seems fine with that. I think before the Western Globalists can gain full control there will be a War. Out of those ashes will come the One World Govt!
It might be more accurate to say that we are seeing Reverse Fascism-- instead of the state using corporations to implement authoritarian policies we see Mega Corporations using the state to implement authoritarian policies.
Putin and his government are pushing mandatory vaccination and QR-coded vaxxpass just as hard as any western European nation, against overwhelming popular opinion. I think he would like to have his country's best interests in mind, but he does not have as many degrees of freedom as you might think, relative to Davos.
This certainly seems to be the track TPTB intend us to be on - those of us in the west, at least. Yes, Trump was/is an impediment to them and Putin certainly seems to be.
What I have been wondering for quite some time, though, is how China fits in with all of this. How does "One Belt, One Road" (which focuses on supply chain, transportation, technology, and financial integration throughout Asia and Africa) actually integrate with the same in Europe and the U.S. - to the advantage of TPTB? These WEF types are all Libs, after all, so they view economics as a piece of the pie / zero sum game. How can they be busy "re-imagining" China when they don't control it? Will Xi give up power to them? Have TPTB in the west already made an agreement with him on a future "bi-polar" world? If not, what makes them think the Chinese won't just use all of this nonsense to their advantage and end up controlling everything in the West?
Tom Luongo at GGG takes the view that the Globalists are really the Davosi, so really Euro centered. They aim to cripple the US and China and Russia enough to allow the Davosi via EU to dominate and call the shots. Their ideal would be a 3 way war between China, US ,and Russia so all three are severely weakened. Luongo posits that Wall Street and the big banks have balked at playing 2nd fiddle to the ECB and are throwing big economic wrenches into the Davosi plan.
As far as China, Soros has railed against Xi and called him a monster and threat to world peace. Xi dished it right back at him. Nice fight. The US Criminal Cartel is trying to play all sides.
Essentially we're living in a global game of musical chairs. We know that the music gonna stop soon (ie the system is going to crash as every major nation in the game is on shaky ground), but we don't know who will be left standing.
Hmmm... Well if Soros has called Xi a monster that means he cannot control him and isn't happy about that. So at least we know the Davoisie and China are not in cahoots:). I like the musical chairs analogy. It seems they all have been trying to outrun the debt mess they are responsible for and they see the writing on the wall now. As you say it is all a matter of timing now - and it won't be pleasant for any of us, unfortunately.
I actually have to laugh when I think of the Europeans trying to go it alone. The people who have bankrupted themselves and made themselves totally dependent on Russia for their energy? The ones who can't afford a military so have been mooching off of us for 70 years? The ones who have disavowed their morality, their religion, and their history? As much as I love European architecture and art and natural beauty and the common people, they have let their governments and politicians destroy their culture and their way of life.
It IS amazing isn't it? Every single one of the players in this musical chair horror show has glaring weaknesses that are systemic and crippling and largely self inflicted. Who will fall apart first though? Who will survive to the next round?
I like and agree with your characterization. I meant Liberal only in the economic theory sense. But it is true that the term Liberal has been seen as being of the Left for some decades now. Of course Classical Liberalism is generally seen as being from the Right. Yeah, the continuum is getting complicated now. I mean, the Dems changed their color on the state election maps from Red to Blue. Who can keep up? :)
I really wish we could abandon the whole left right thing. It only serves to muddy the waters, especially in an age where left right has become a hash. Far more useful to think in terms of collectivist vs individualist, in a continuum.
I'm a Christian too, or at least a Jesus follower. I don't see any conflict between being a believer and rejecting an authoritarian collectivist political philosophy.
Well, maybe not such a helpful sub. By "collectivist" i mean the use of force to compel the individual to act or not act. To the extent that any of us choose of our own free will to join 'collectively' in worship for example or community action, we are not being collectivists. However, if a group compels me to worship under threat of force or harm then that is collectivism. You're not for that are you?
I agree with most of your article. Except the part about Putin wanting to preserve The Russia that communism took away? Putin was KGB and is in partnership with China to take control of the World. The US is all that stands in the way. China needs land for its billion as they have laid waste to theirs! Putin wants Europe and Germany seems fine with that. I think before the Western Globalists can gain full control there will be a War. Out of those ashes will come the One World Govt!
It might be more accurate to say that we are seeing Reverse Fascism-- instead of the state using corporations to implement authoritarian policies we see Mega Corporations using the state to implement authoritarian policies.
Putin and his government are pushing mandatory vaccination and QR-coded vaxxpass just as hard as any western European nation, against overwhelming popular opinion. I think he would like to have his country's best interests in mind, but he does not have as many degrees of freedom as you might think, relative to Davos.
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/dont-worry-russia-is-different
This certainly seems to be the track TPTB intend us to be on - those of us in the west, at least. Yes, Trump was/is an impediment to them and Putin certainly seems to be.
What I have been wondering for quite some time, though, is how China fits in with all of this. How does "One Belt, One Road" (which focuses on supply chain, transportation, technology, and financial integration throughout Asia and Africa) actually integrate with the same in Europe and the U.S. - to the advantage of TPTB? These WEF types are all Libs, after all, so they view economics as a piece of the pie / zero sum game. How can they be busy "re-imagining" China when they don't control it? Will Xi give up power to them? Have TPTB in the west already made an agreement with him on a future "bi-polar" world? If not, what makes them think the Chinese won't just use all of this nonsense to their advantage and end up controlling everything in the West?
Tom Luongo at GGG takes the view that the Globalists are really the Davosi, so really Euro centered. They aim to cripple the US and China and Russia enough to allow the Davosi via EU to dominate and call the shots. Their ideal would be a 3 way war between China, US ,and Russia so all three are severely weakened. Luongo posits that Wall Street and the big banks have balked at playing 2nd fiddle to the ECB and are throwing big economic wrenches into the Davosi plan.
As far as China, Soros has railed against Xi and called him a monster and threat to world peace. Xi dished it right back at him. Nice fight. The US Criminal Cartel is trying to play all sides.
Essentially we're living in a global game of musical chairs. We know that the music gonna stop soon (ie the system is going to crash as every major nation in the game is on shaky ground), but we don't know who will be left standing.
Hmmm... Well if Soros has called Xi a monster that means he cannot control him and isn't happy about that. So at least we know the Davoisie and China are not in cahoots:). I like the musical chairs analogy. It seems they all have been trying to outrun the debt mess they are responsible for and they see the writing on the wall now. As you say it is all a matter of timing now - and it won't be pleasant for any of us, unfortunately.
I actually have to laugh when I think of the Europeans trying to go it alone. The people who have bankrupted themselves and made themselves totally dependent on Russia for their energy? The ones who can't afford a military so have been mooching off of us for 70 years? The ones who have disavowed their morality, their religion, and their history? As much as I love European architecture and art and natural beauty and the common people, they have let their governments and politicians destroy their culture and their way of life.
It IS amazing isn't it? Every single one of the players in this musical chair horror show has glaring weaknesses that are systemic and crippling and largely self inflicted. Who will fall apart first though? Who will survive to the next round?
China is using all this nonsense, and even promote it outside China, to further their own interests and internally for their own reset.
I like and agree with your characterization. I meant Liberal only in the economic theory sense. But it is true that the term Liberal has been seen as being of the Left for some decades now. Of course Classical Liberalism is generally seen as being from the Right. Yeah, the continuum is getting complicated now. I mean, the Dems changed their color on the state election maps from Red to Blue. Who can keep up? :)
Historically fascism has always been a leftist thing.
I really wish we could abandon the whole left right thing. It only serves to muddy the waters, especially in an age where left right has become a hash. Far more useful to think in terms of collectivist vs individualist, in a continuum.
I'm a Christian--I'm not on that continuum.
I'm a Christian too, or at least a Jesus follower. I don't see any conflict between being a believer and rejecting an authoritarian collectivist political philosophy.
I was rejecting being located on a collectivist - individualist continuum. Because I'm a Christian.
Well, maybe not such a helpful sub. By "collectivist" i mean the use of force to compel the individual to act or not act. To the extent that any of us choose of our own free will to join 'collectively' in worship for example or community action, we are not being collectivists. However, if a group compels me to worship under threat of force or harm then that is collectivism. You're not for that are you?
In "BOOM: Malone goes There, There, and There" a comment:
"Splat16 hr ago
Is the USA sovereign or our are our leaders bought and paid for policy enforcers? Are we as a people really "free?" Read about the Global Public Private Partnership (GPPP). This is the desired future state of TPTB: https://off-guardian.org/2021/10/20/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
Duck, duck go: NAC - natural assest companies"
It is from Splat's comment that I'd venture you found the link.
Kudos to Splat, I'd seen his link, read it, and forwarded to several friends prior to reading your summary of the article.
Thanks for all your work on Meaning in History.
Globalists delenda est
Thanks. Very strange. I searched both the title and the URL.
Yes, one that I puzzled over a bit while writing.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/11/18/swedens-vaccine-passes-should-teach-us-an-important-lesson/