Will WWIII start? How would you know for certain it HAD started, absent open exchanges of nuclear strikes?!
For that matter, when DID WWII really "start"?
WWII had a sort of "soft start" when certain parties thought it could be a limited action, actual combat might be foisted off onto some other near peer competitor country full of dumb peasants to degrade both them AND the Germans & etc., we are in a similar phase of WWIII already AFAICT.
Reading historical documents where the British and Americans are alternately worried that either the Germans OR the Russians are doing too poorly and both won't have their future capabilities sufficiently and EQUALLY degraded is quite revealing- The European side of WWII didn't "just happen that way", there was a lot of ruthlessly amoral intent, devious financial backing and calculated technological transfer choices towards both USSR (the banker's out of control bogeyman) and Germany (their bigger hammer), careful maneuvering by several parties which some in the USSR at least partially understood and somewhat foiled. Hitler's buddies despite being meaner than snakes were also mostly dumb as a sack full of hammers- much like their present day echoes, they did what was expected of them.
Link 1 is a documentary produced by firefighters about Building 7 WTC.
Link 2 is 2hrs 47 minutes long but it speaks to the subject matter of this post. If nothing else it validates your thoughts/theory.
I found both films gripping and gut wrenching. It's also heartbreaking that YouTube has clearly shadow banned both. However it does mean you can watch both ad free.
I hope people will take the time to watch and share.
Trump is the perfect foil for US patriots, the master of double speak, Operation Warpspeed and then hydroxychloroquine, deportations and then H/1b visas, peaceful negotiations and then clearing Gaza and bombing Yemen….
From a macro perspective you can’t wage a global war under a global economy. Trump is clearly prepping the West for conflict under the cover of patriotism.
Forcing Europe to militarise the economy, redirecting energy resources, reindustrialising, clearing logistic lanes and shutting opposition.
Europe is talking remilitarization, but they're not doing it. Instead even Germany is exploring ways to reconnect to Russia. I don't see how this can happen. I don't doubt that the West's rulers are seeking to control an increasingly disillusioned population, but I don't see any practical way for major warfare against Eurasia after this defeat.
Yes Mark, the Rottenchilds control the western part of the world, they don't control the world anymore since project Hitler failed. JFK and Eisenhower were the last 2 presidents of note. Since then it's all been a charade. In Europe it's been the same charade since De Gaulle. The DNA of that family is rotten to the core.
Brilliant exposé Mark. Krainer buttresses your thoughts on these immoral money-changers and your larger thoughts on Trump. Now in Germany for a few days, when the word “Trump” comes up, I’ve basically said, “he’s saved us from worse…” which seems to shut down further criticism! Tx again for the fruit of all your ponderings, even as it is the “sad and dirty lowdown” as Dissonant describes it.
I read Krainer's Things they forgot --, then watched Krainer dissect the Theranos debacle as another case-study, like the Alberta oil sands 'collateral' scam. Alex concluded that the Theranos agenda was authoritarian: to prepare the masses for submission to dictated medical interventions, presaging Covid & PCR testing.
The Theranos video was published 3 years ago.
On Apr 22 '25 Glenn Greenwald spotlighted Lee Fang's reporting on Conditions governing NIH grants. Conditions considered "discriminatory" and forbidden are: "refusing to deal, cutting commercial relations, or otherwise ... specifically with Israel ..." https://rumble.com/v6sfvax-system-update-show-441.html
One more form of preparing the masses for submission.
"Is Trump Actually Taking on the Bankers" is the very heart of your question. Krainer's position is that yes, Trump is; while trying to stay below the level that puts him on the list of the US presidents who opposed the Anglo-Zionists openly: Those presidents were William Henry Harrison (9th, 1941), Zachary Taylor (12th, 1850), Abraham Lincoln (16th, 1865), James Garfield (20th, 1881), William McKinley (25th, 1901), Warren G. Harding (29th, 1923), Franklin D. Roosevelt (32nd, 1945), and John F. Kennedy (35th, 1963).
You will note that they have something very significant in common. And that we have been fighting the Anglo-Zionists for the majority of America's existence.
Thanks. This is an important article. I hadn't yet come to grips with the likelihood that 8(!) American presidents may have been assassinated by Those Actually In Charge. He talks about Henry C Carey being an influence on Hamilton, Lincoln and now Trump. I found this plain English article on Carey which helped me to understand his perspective better:
"political economy must be based on the world as it is, not abstract theory."
What a concept, eh? But this is the dominant philosophical worldview of the West since the Enlightenment--but with roots all the way back to Plato. Imposing thought upon reality, man creates reality. It's at the base of Kantian thinking that influenced both the "capitalist" West and Marxist thinking.
The sad, sad, truth... the dirty lowdown. For someone who is exhausted at the prospect of examining all of this, you describe it very well, Mark. Thank you. Will the time ever come again in this world where normal human beings are viewed as having more value than just being consumers and debtors; and collateral that is leveraged to the benefit of their "betters"? BTW, does this make you fellow readers realize why the bankers are so averse to the idea of Cryptocurrencies, and so supportive of the idea of CBDCs?
A Bit off Topic but on topic upcoming and needed compromises with Russia, China, and Iran
It has been suggested by -- Yemen -- that one of Trump/US main concerns is US continuing ongoing relations with Saud UAE and others. US the great protector and seller of arms - Saud handsomely rewards US in return with oil and monies
--- EG: If Yemen attacks Saud oil fields showing US cannot protect them, then Saud and others will have to turn to Iran Russia China for protection [ sooner or later ]
It seems to be with an ocean between them, it is getting Significantly more difficult for US to protect UAE Saud and others extremely more difficult = that means sooner or later they will turn away from US .
If Saud sends in ISIS and other mercenaries, it appears oil fields are on the Yemen target list and if US cannot protect friendly to US states - that may be a very significant change in circumstances
Yemen anticipates US Saud mercenary attack any day now with US air cover
The US spent ten years supporting the Saudis in their fight against the Houthis in Yemen. The Saudi oil infrastructure was attacked from time to time during that war. The Iranians are somewhat aligned with the Houthis. It is hard to imagine the Saudis turning to Iran for defense against the Houthis. It would very much be a case of the fox guarding the henhouse.
Mark, I hope we don't go to a full scale WW3 although I feel like we are in its beginning phases already. I enjoy all your posts and they cause me to think deeper across many domains. Thank you.
Started a
For any reader still in doubt about the "power" of the Rothschild cabal may I suggest perusing the
'The Timeline of the Rothschild Family' by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock .
No doubt there are parts of the content open to historical and even factual discussion , but overall a very eye opening missive .
Will WWIII start? How would you know for certain it HAD started, absent open exchanges of nuclear strikes?!
For that matter, when DID WWII really "start"?
WWII had a sort of "soft start" when certain parties thought it could be a limited action, actual combat might be foisted off onto some other near peer competitor country full of dumb peasants to degrade both them AND the Germans & etc., we are in a similar phase of WWIII already AFAICT.
Reading historical documents where the British and Americans are alternately worried that either the Germans OR the Russians are doing too poorly and both won't have their future capabilities sufficiently and EQUALLY degraded is quite revealing- The European side of WWII didn't "just happen that way", there was a lot of ruthlessly amoral intent, devious financial backing and calculated technological transfer choices towards both USSR (the banker's out of control bogeyman) and Germany (their bigger hammer), careful maneuvering by several parties which some in the USSR at least partially understood and somewhat foiled. Hitler's buddies despite being meaner than snakes were also mostly dumb as a sack full of hammers- much like their present day echoes, they did what was expected of them.
https://youtu.be/ksIwSizYaGs?feature=shared
'Calling out Bravo 7'
https://youtu.be/WZoMk88SAsA?feature=shared
'Beyond Bravo 7'
Link 1 is a documentary produced by firefighters about Building 7 WTC.
Link 2 is 2hrs 47 minutes long but it speaks to the subject matter of this post. If nothing else it validates your thoughts/theory.
I found both films gripping and gut wrenching. It's also heartbreaking that YouTube has clearly shadow banned both. However it does mean you can watch both ad free.
I hope people will take the time to watch and share.
Got through the first one. I've read about Silverstein before and I've seen other videos on this, but this was the most powerful.
Yes - the final segment is gutwrenching. My husband, who is not known for his empathy, cried.
The 2nd is more of a history lesson. Gutwrenching in a different way.
Thanks. I saw that Ron Johnson is going to be holding hearings on Bldg 7.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=ron+johnson+bldg+7+wtc&ia=web
Trump is the perfect foil for US patriots, the master of double speak, Operation Warpspeed and then hydroxychloroquine, deportations and then H/1b visas, peaceful negotiations and then clearing Gaza and bombing Yemen….
From a macro perspective you can’t wage a global war under a global economy. Trump is clearly prepping the West for conflict under the cover of patriotism.
Forcing Europe to militarise the economy, redirecting energy resources, reindustrialising, clearing logistic lanes and shutting opposition.
Europe is talking remilitarization, but they're not doing it. Instead even Germany is exploring ways to reconnect to Russia. I don't see how this can happen. I don't doubt that the West's rulers are seeking to control an increasingly disillusioned population, but I don't see any practical way for major warfare against Eurasia after this defeat.
Yes Mark, the Rottenchilds control the western part of the world, they don't control the world anymore since project Hitler failed. JFK and Eisenhower were the last 2 presidents of note. Since then it's all been a charade. In Europe it's been the same charade since De Gaulle. The DNA of that family is rotten to the core.
Sir... a suggestion: M.S. King's two books on them are quite... entertaining...
Not sure if completely 100% true but... entertaining nevertheless and eyes opening as well...
Kudos to You
Brilliant exposé Mark. Krainer buttresses your thoughts on these immoral money-changers and your larger thoughts on Trump. Now in Germany for a few days, when the word “Trump” comes up, I’ve basically said, “he’s saved us from worse…” which seems to shut down further criticism! Tx again for the fruit of all your ponderings, even as it is the “sad and dirty lowdown” as Dissonant describes it.
Thanks for putting threads together, Mark.
I read Krainer's Things they forgot --, then watched Krainer dissect the Theranos debacle as another case-study, like the Alberta oil sands 'collateral' scam. Alex concluded that the Theranos agenda was authoritarian: to prepare the masses for submission to dictated medical interventions, presaging Covid & PCR testing.
The Theranos video was published 3 years ago.
On Apr 22 '25 Glenn Greenwald spotlighted Lee Fang's reporting on Conditions governing NIH grants. Conditions considered "discriminatory" and forbidden are: "refusing to deal, cutting commercial relations, or otherwise ... specifically with Israel ..." https://rumble.com/v6sfvax-system-update-show-441.html
One more form of preparing the masses for submission.
You might have seen it, but Alex Krainer had another big piece today. It was big enough that he put it not just in his "daily dash" Substack, https://trendcompass.substack.com/p/trump-vs-the-bankers-is-the-struggle; but also in his "periodical" Substack, https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/is-trump-actually-taking-on-the-bankers. He was happy enough with it that he cross-posted the same essay on the same day.
"Is Trump Actually Taking on the Bankers" is the very heart of your question. Krainer's position is that yes, Trump is; while trying to stay below the level that puts him on the list of the US presidents who opposed the Anglo-Zionists openly: Those presidents were William Henry Harrison (9th, 1941), Zachary Taylor (12th, 1850), Abraham Lincoln (16th, 1865), James Garfield (20th, 1881), William McKinley (25th, 1901), Warren G. Harding (29th, 1923), Franklin D. Roosevelt (32nd, 1945), and John F. Kennedy (35th, 1963).
You will note that they have something very significant in common. And that we have been fighting the Anglo-Zionists for the majority of America's existence.
Thanks. This is an important article. I hadn't yet come to grips with the likelihood that 8(!) American presidents may have been assassinated by Those Actually In Charge. He talks about Henry C Carey being an influence on Hamilton, Lincoln and now Trump. I found this plain English article on Carey which helped me to understand his perspective better:
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/henry-c-careys-practical-economics/
"political economy must be based on the world as it is, not abstract theory."
What a concept, eh? But this is the dominant philosophical worldview of the West since the Enlightenment--but with roots all the way back to Plato. Imposing thought upon reality, man creates reality. It's at the base of Kantian thinking that influenced both the "capitalist" West and Marxist thinking.
Thanks, Jeff. I always check his twitter feed early in the morning but he didn't link it.
The Trend Compass pieces come out daily. They are generally excellent.
Great Article. Wars are fought over natural resources.
The sad, sad, truth... the dirty lowdown. For someone who is exhausted at the prospect of examining all of this, you describe it very well, Mark. Thank you. Will the time ever come again in this world where normal human beings are viewed as having more value than just being consumers and debtors; and collateral that is leveraged to the benefit of their "betters"? BTW, does this make you fellow readers realize why the bankers are so averse to the idea of Cryptocurrencies, and so supportive of the idea of CBDCs?
Max Blumenthal told Nap that "Feinberg runs Pentagon." Feinberg = a money-man of the "scum-bag" variety, says Max.
BTW, Cotton has been suggested as replacement for Hegseth. Have not seen anyone mention of China hawk Bridge Colby, who is already in the dugout.
Cotton is a sideways move, but he is loyal to the Zionist agenda. Ex-Military doesn't always square with support for our interests. He serves the MIC.
A Bit off Topic but on topic upcoming and needed compromises with Russia, China, and Iran
It has been suggested by -- Yemen -- that one of Trump/US main concerns is US continuing ongoing relations with Saud UAE and others. US the great protector and seller of arms - Saud handsomely rewards US in return with oil and monies
--- EG: If Yemen attacks Saud oil fields showing US cannot protect them, then Saud and others will have to turn to Iran Russia China for protection [ sooner or later ]
It seems to be with an ocean between them, it is getting Significantly more difficult for US to protect UAE Saud and others extremely more difficult = that means sooner or later they will turn away from US .
If Saud sends in ISIS and other mercenaries, it appears oil fields are on the Yemen target list and if US cannot protect friendly to US states - that may be a very significant change in circumstances
Yemen anticipates US Saud mercenary attack any day now with US air cover
cued in to spot
https://youtu.be/tWgoRUiCSpM?t=1573
Blumenthal
[[[ apologies but for me all roads lead to Yemen ]]]
The US spent ten years supporting the Saudis in their fight against the Houthis in Yemen. The Saudi oil infrastructure was attacked from time to time during that war. The Iranians are somewhat aligned with the Houthis. It is hard to imagine the Saudis turning to Iran for defense against the Houthis. It would very much be a case of the fox guarding the henhouse.
Interesting no attacks against Saudi infrastructure from Yemen.
My swag is Saudi Arabia is staying neutral on the Houthis.
Mark, I hope we don't go to a full scale WW3 although I feel like we are in its beginning phases already. I enjoy all your posts and they cause me to think deeper across many domains. Thank you.
You're welcome!