I believe that derives from you, ultimately, although I didn't get it from reading you--one of your colleagues, most likely. Stephen McIntyre? Hans Mahncke? If there was no link that was an oversight--I try hard to document everything.
John Solomon on Hannity moments ago says GJ activity continues, and focus includes FBI officials involved in the FISA application on Carter Page; says they will be held to account -- expects indictments.
Sussmann's Congressional depo obscures the distinction between Hillary's campaign as the "client" and Joffe -- who provided Sussmann with the cobbled together with baling wire DNS data and barely plausible hypothesis as to it's meaning -- who as ALSO a client of Sussmann.
John Solomon, in an interview, said more indictments will be forthcoming. This "speaking indictment" of Sussmann does nothing to diminish my faith in Solomon's claim.
I confess I'm surprised, after all that has passed, that there's a meaningful indictment coming out of this.
But I remain skeptical of its overall effect.
And I agree with your comment about the government. It's all a show now, as long as they can hold it together. But people are starting to notice. Unfortunately, the water is already boiling and this frog is cooked; they will proceed to the next phase when they deem it necessary, whatever that may be.
You were quick on the Joffe draw, was that from me or sources? Do you know Gessford?
I believe that derives from you, ultimately, although I didn't get it from reading you--one of your colleagues, most likely. Stephen McIntyre? Hans Mahncke? If there was no link that was an oversight--I try hard to document everything.
Got it, just seeing if there's any whispers about him going on in various circles 👍
Feel free to tell me who Gessford is.
Ben Gessford Case agent 2 on CH, he was involved with the Hanssen case
No, that's news to me. Obviously rubs a raw spot. These people keep rising ...
I hear ya
"Gessford" doesn't mean anything to me.
Where are the GJ's located, DC? I am surprised we're seeing an indictment as I've lost faith anything meaningful comes out of this.
Does anybody really think the Law will touch Hillary 'Teflon' Clinton?
Can Garland try to overrule Durham, on which prosecutors/ staffers get put onto which cases?
I doubt it. They all would come from Durham's office. Don't overthink this stuff.
Durham's indictment is pretty solid and supported by the evidence.
John Solomon on Hannity moments ago says GJ activity continues, and focus includes FBI officials involved in the FISA application on Carter Page; says they will be held to account -- expects indictments.
Sussmann's Congressional depo obscures the distinction between Hillary's campaign as the "client" and Joffe -- who provided Sussmann with the cobbled together with baling wire DNS data and barely plausible hypothesis as to it's meaning -- who as ALSO a client of Sussmann.
John Solomon, in an interview, said more indictments will be forthcoming. This "speaking indictment" of Sussmann does nothing to diminish my faith in Solomon's claim.
Hang in there TD. We’ve outlasted Bluto Barr.
I'm with you, TD.
I confess I'm surprised, after all that has passed, that there's a meaningful indictment coming out of this.
But I remain skeptical of its overall effect.
And I agree with your comment about the government. It's all a show now, as long as they can hold it together. But people are starting to notice. Unfortunately, the water is already boiling and this frog is cooked; they will proceed to the next phase when they deem it necessary, whatever that may be.