What Kind Of Regime Condones Violence Against Conscientious Public Officials?
I think everyone knows the answer to that one—history tells us. America is slipping into official lawlessness. That is, laws against violence no longer apply as long as the violence is directed at law abiding opponents of the regime. And we have a Disinformation Board to make sure that the official violence will be mislabeled. Not that the MSM needs any encouragement in that regard.
On a related note, the Zhou regime is warning that 100 million people could come down with Covid—variants of the Ominous Omicron—in the Fall. These variants, we’re told, “have an uncanny ability to evade immunity.”
That’s a head scratcher, right? If you’re immune, well, then you’re immune. You don’t get infected. I think that’s right, isn’t it? If you get infected, that must mean you didn’t have immunity. I think that’s right, too. So I think what we’re actually being told is that the injections don’t confer immunity. It’s just a roundabout, lying way of telling you that.
Did I mention that the time frame for all these infections is exactly during the time frame when we’re scheduled to have elections? Just sayin’.
Commentary from Twitter:
After going astray a bit, Trump seems to be getting back to the messaging that got him elected:
Hmmmm. This would, IMO, be a smart move—for the reason Turley gives down below. Few Americans approve of this behavior:
Why do people these days keep talking about “the regime”?
Shout out to John Roberts:
Jonathan Turley:
When asked for a response to the leaking of a justice’s draft opinion, White House press secretary Jen Psaki declined to condemn the leaker and said the real issue was the opinion itself. Then she was asked about the potential targeting of justices and their families at their homes, and whether that might be considered extreme. It should have been another easy question; few Americans would approve of such doxing, particularly since some of the justices have young children at home. Yet Psaki declared that “I don’t have an official U.S. government position on where people protest,” adding that “peaceful protest is not extreme.”
In reality, not having an official position on doxing and harassing Supreme Court justices and their families is a policy.
Republican legislators are organizing events to protest the doxxing and harassment and the failure to address pressuring of judges. Woops—the snowball is melting!
This is actually the New York Young Republican Club's Catholic Caucus. Twitter fact checking?
OK, I’ll ask: What’s a bumble match?
How does this work again?
And finally. I already posted the first few minutes of this Tucker monologue. I don’t know how to cue a Youtube to a certain point, so I’ll just say—don’t miss the ~five minutes at the end, starting around 7:00:
Stephen McIntyre
@ClimateAudit
BREAKING: Chief Justice Roberts announced that investigation into leaked documents will be led by counterintelligence experts & former FBI employees Kevin Clinesmith and Peter Strzok. Senator Lindsey Graham endorsed appintmentments as best people to "get to bottom" of affair /src
From what I've read so far in regard to protests outside SCOTUS justices' homes, it seems to only be happening to those living in Maryland. Virginia's Governor Youngkin publicly stated the Virginia Highway Patrol would be assisting in safeguarding justices who lived in Virginia - and very likely effecting arrests of protestors based on Virginia law against judicial intimidation.