The trial documents the hanky panky, regardless the ultimate verdict. People who pay attention can't unsee that & the longer the trial(s) are in the news, the more ppl who see. I wish it would have been shut down & a bunch of people gone to jail in 2016, 2017, etc, but it wasn't. At least none of these miscreants are in the clear & won't ever be in unanimous public opinion no matter what the jury decides.
Why is everybody so negative? It seems to me is that what the Democrats don't have in brains they more than make up for in arrogance. They clearly don't know how to run a country. On top of Russiagate they claim to have won an election for President with what I will charitably call many uninvestigated irregularities and instead of working hard to make things better for everybody they are messing things up monumentally. I give Durham, and there are certainly others involved, credit for working slowly and methodically to reveal and prosecute the crimes of those who plotted to destroy America, all the while keeping in mind that our system of government of the people, by the people and for the people must be preserved and strengthened. Now we voters have to do our part.
This isn't going to be resolved in either a courtroom or a voting booth. I don't see how it is possible to conjure even the smallest modicum of hope that this process is anything but a cynical, in-your-face, demonstration of naked, demonic power. They have allowed Durham to resurface long after he might have done some good (in 2020), only to allow statutes of limitation to expire, juries to be stacked, bogus client privilege evidence to be withheld, and rumors of ongoing grand jury proceedings to be teased. The amazing corner of Twitter that uncovered this travesty was years ahead of Durham. Maybe the new SCO had a smaller budget than Mueller, but he certainly had a bigger one than Mahncke, McIntyre, Fool Nelson, Mate, Techno Fog, et al.
They allowed this to go on precisely because they know that nobody of consequence is going to go down. When Durham's final report is issued, check the MS Word file meta data. It will probably show that the report Create Date was some time in 2018.
I've found it often takes quite awhile for comments to appear on substack. I tend to just trust my comment posted & move on. Usually get confirmation via likes or comments w/in an hr or so.
The trial documents the hanky panky, regardless the ultimate verdict. People who pay attention can't unsee that & the longer the trial(s) are in the news, the more ppl who see. I wish it would have been shut down & a bunch of people gone to jail in 2016, 2017, etc, but it wasn't. At least none of these miscreants are in the clear & won't ever be in unanimous public opinion no matter what the jury decides.
Why is everybody so negative? It seems to me is that what the Democrats don't have in brains they more than make up for in arrogance. They clearly don't know how to run a country. On top of Russiagate they claim to have won an election for President with what I will charitably call many uninvestigated irregularities and instead of working hard to make things better for everybody they are messing things up monumentally. I give Durham, and there are certainly others involved, credit for working slowly and methodically to reveal and prosecute the crimes of those who plotted to destroy America, all the while keeping in mind that our system of government of the people, by the people and for the people must be preserved and strengthened. Now we voters have to do our part.
This isn't going to be resolved in either a courtroom or a voting booth. I don't see how it is possible to conjure even the smallest modicum of hope that this process is anything but a cynical, in-your-face, demonstration of naked, demonic power. They have allowed Durham to resurface long after he might have done some good (in 2020), only to allow statutes of limitation to expire, juries to be stacked, bogus client privilege evidence to be withheld, and rumors of ongoing grand jury proceedings to be teased. The amazing corner of Twitter that uncovered this travesty was years ahead of Durham. Maybe the new SCO had a smaller budget than Mueller, but he certainly had a bigger one than Mahncke, McIntyre, Fool Nelson, Mate, Techno Fog, et al.
They allowed this to go on precisely because they know that nobody of consequence is going to go down. When Durham's final report is issued, check the MS Word file meta data. It will probably show that the report Create Date was some time in 2018.
OK, it took 3 tries to post 1 comment?
I've found it often takes quite awhile for comments to appear on substack. I tend to just trust my comment posted & move on. Usually get confirmation via likes or comments w/in an hr or so.
Thanks.
That seems to be true. Last night I wanted to respond to a comment that I saw in my inbox, but it didn't show up on substack until today.
you're batting a thousand
😂
They are Democrats!
Why bother with a trial?
They are DEMOCRATS!
Why bother with a trial?
Even people who don't deserve one should get one.
I think you missed the point.
As Democrats, they will not be convicted. So don't waste the time and money.