Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Wauck's avatar

AB is channeling Robert Malone's views--Sarcastic Cynical Texan links the article:

https://www.malone.news/p/ai-mrna-cancer-vaccines-and-stargate

"Beyond the cancer biology and immunology, and putting aside the current problems with mRNA vaccine technology, there is a deeper issue here. This involves corporatism - in other words “public-private partnerships”, and the government essentially choosing scientific winners and losers. What is being proposed is not pro-innovation. It is not pro-science. This is pro- big business. This is an example of precisely what we do not need to do if we are to promote innovation and “Make America Great Again”. The role of limited government in a situation like this should be to act to insure the purity (lack of adulteration), identity (is the product what it claims to be), safety and effectiveness of any medical products that emerge from private entrepreneurship. The role of government should not be to specifically sponsor and partner with big business (or NGO) to push one solution over another - no matter how “sexy” or “trendy” the name, concept or buzzwords. Unlike biodefense, the cancer market is huge. It does not require government subsidy."

Expand full comment
Cosmo T Kat's avatar

The two money quotes IMHO:

"It's like watching two fundamentally different philosophies collide: one betting that AI's future lies in massive centralized infrastructure controlled by a few players, the other pushing toward a decentralized future where AI becomes a basic utility that anyone can deploy."

"It may also help Larry Ellison create the largest bank account ever."

There you have it in a nutshell..................on Ellison, well stated, Mark

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts