Update Re: All Those Dead Working Age People

Zerohedge has picked up on this story that I wrote about yesterday, citing the original source: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64 (a very full review of what’s going on at present). Here’s the Zerohedge summary, which I want to briefly address:

Life Insurance CEO Says Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64

The death rate for those aged 18-64 has risen an astonishing 40% over pre-pandemic levels, according to the CEO of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica.

There’s no actual new information in this Zerohedge piece, however there is some smart commentary via Twitter—which closely tracks what I was suggesting yesterday but in smarter perspective. Read these tweets carefully. Do you really think this insurance CEO is the only person in America with a clue about this? Does this suggest to you that the Covid Regime is heading down a rocky road? “The actuaries are on to it.” Right. As I said yesterday, hiding the deaths was always going to be the real hard part—not to mention the permanent disabilities. The quotes in the tweets, of course, are from the article:

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

The actuaries are on to it…what are the truth ministries going to do now? Hint: it ain’t Covid. Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64 | Indiana | thecentersquare.com

thecentersquare.comIndiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64(The Center Square) – The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

It’s hard to hide 3 sigma events from actuaries with bullshit media propaganda…take note friends & read the thread this tweet is in. This actuarial datapoint is a game changer in the debate. https://t.co/JWH6eNjWR8

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

I can’t emphasize how big of a deal this is…actuaries just assess risk with math. They will be pushing the costs on to employers. Don’t trust VAERS?…well the actuaries trust math so they don’t care what you think.

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

As a former BlackRock investment professional with a view that $PFE is going to zero this actuarial data point is gold to my thesis. Those who own this stock should be absolutely terrified if they thought there was no merit to my thesis of fraud.

…

Now read this last one—read it at least twice:

Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle @DowdEdward

So the CEO in his own words. They are mandating vaccines in the workplace and raising premiums in lower vaccinated counties because they are mistakenly guessing here initially. The premiums will change to higher vaccinated areas as time moves on is my guess. He missed the plot.

“The premiums will change to higher vaccinated areas as time moves on is my guess.”

And how about the fraudsters?