The German state run TV won't allow AfD leader Alice Weidel to be part of the election debates. So ...
Megatron @Megatron_ron
 The German state TV has decided to NOT have AfD leader Alice Weidel on the TV debate ahead of the elections despite the AfD is the second largest party in Germany right now.
Alice Weidel @Alice_Weidel
Save the date: On January 9th at 7pm CET, the announced Space with Elon Musk and me will go live on X. We are looking forward to having this exciting conversation and a great audience!
The US can blow up the European energy infrastructure, spy on its leaders, manupulate its civil society, take over its industries etc. etc. - and there are never any consequences or defence of national interests. With such obedience, why not also take some European territory?
Greenland is "European territory"? When did that happen? The US is "taking" it, even though Diesen includes a picture of the Greenland PM pushing for the independence of his "European territory"? What ever happened to anti-colonialism?
It seems that the Greenland PM in his speech dropped some broad hints about doing a deal with neighboring countries and leaving colonialism under the Danish jackboot behind. While stating that Greenland is "not for sale", he also said:
“It is about time that we ourselves take a step and shape our future, also with regard to who we will cooperate closely with, and who our trading partners will be,” he said…
“It is now time for our country to take the next step. Like other countries in the world, we must work to remove the obstacles to cooperation – which we can describe as the shackles of colonialism – and move forward,” he said.
“We must not lose our long struggle for freedom. However, we must continue to be open to co-operation and trade with the whole world, **especially with our neighbours,”** he said.
Are the Anglo Zionists eager to bomb Iran's deveopment of nuclear power AND nuclear weapons?
'All things nuclear not allowed in Iran', do they decree?
What if Peru or Kenya chose to develop nuclear power and nuclear weapons? Would the US then want to bomb those countries?
I am coming from my opinions that: 1. one country should not start a war on another in order to help the maniacal, imperialist goals of a tiny country's leader; and 2. do some of these warmongering, war-loving countries not know and respect what 'sovereign nation' means?
Greenland. Been there. Knew absolutely nothing about the place before I volunteered for a last minute ride. No internet back then either. Beautiful place in a strange kind of way. Was middle of summer, would never, ever want to be there in winter. Remember being stopped from creating “an international incident” while there. We used to like to put the Red, White, and Blue atop what we built back in those days. Was told that was a strict no go. Who knew? Looking back, we should have just gone ahead and flown our flag.
If the Greenland Inuit don't like Denmark practicing eugenics on them without permission, they should probably do a quick consult with other native peoples in US jurisdiction before hopping out of that particular frying pan.
I suppose they're expected to just love all the military base building and natural resource extraction that the Don apparently has in mind for them?
The Pentagon will certainly not say "no" to more Forever War. They and their good friends in the so-called Defense Industrial Base are probably pulling the strings in the inner circles in the first place. Best we can hope for is a tactical "not yet" on the old bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb-Iran chorus.
Instead of appearing at his sentencing Trump should, at that exact time, schedule a mini press conference and tell everyone that attacking Iran at this point is unconstitutional and it is his expectation that the Congress should be involved and authorize an attack via a declaration of war.
There are certainly puzzling, even contradictory, statements being made; difficult to impossible to reconcile with physical evidence; what I'm not seeing is an agenda. I read his email, and much of it seemed out of wack to me.
The German state run TV won't allow AfD leader Alice Weidel to be part of the election debates. So ...
Megatron @Megatron_ron
 The German state TV has decided to NOT have AfD leader Alice Weidel on the TV debate ahead of the elections despite the AfD is the second largest party in Germany right now.
Alice Weidel @Alice_Weidel
Save the date: On January 9th at 7pm CET, the announced Space with Elon Musk and me will go live on X. We are looking forward to having this exciting conversation and a great audience!
ausgezeichnet! excellent!
Interesting:
Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen
The US can blow up the European energy infrastructure, spy on its leaders, manupulate its civil society, take over its industries etc. etc. - and there are never any consequences or defence of national interests. With such obedience, why not also take some European territory?
Greenland is "European territory"? When did that happen? The US is "taking" it, even though Diesen includes a picture of the Greenland PM pushing for the independence of his "European territory"? What ever happened to anti-colonialism?
MGGA: Make Greenland Great Again!
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/make-greenland-great-again-pm-seeks-independence-denmark
It seems that the Greenland PM in his speech dropped some broad hints about doing a deal with neighboring countries and leaving colonialism under the Danish jackboot behind. While stating that Greenland is "not for sale", he also said:
“It is about time that we ourselves take a step and shape our future, also with regard to who we will cooperate closely with, and who our trading partners will be,” he said…
“It is now time for our country to take the next step. Like other countries in the world, we must work to remove the obstacles to cooperation – which we can describe as the shackles of colonialism – and move forward,” he said.
“We must not lose our long struggle for freedom. However, we must continue to be open to co-operation and trade with the whole world, **especially with our neighbours,”** he said.
Are the Anglo Zionists eager to bomb Iran's deveopment of nuclear power AND nuclear weapons?
'All things nuclear not allowed in Iran', do they decree?
What if Peru or Kenya chose to develop nuclear power and nuclear weapons? Would the US then want to bomb those countries?
I am coming from my opinions that: 1. one country should not start a war on another in order to help the maniacal, imperialist goals of a tiny country's leader; and 2. do some of these warmongering, war-loving countries not know and respect what 'sovereign nation' means?
Just thinking and wondering, I am.
Any truth to Syrian HTS attacking Lebanon? Seems like the ‘axis’ getting dismantled by proxies.
From what I read it was a dispute over opening/closing a border crossing post but didn't go beyond that.
https://www.rt.com/news/610414-greenland-denmark-independence-colonialism/
Greenland. Been there. Knew absolutely nothing about the place before I volunteered for a last minute ride. No internet back then either. Beautiful place in a strange kind of way. Was middle of summer, would never, ever want to be there in winter. Remember being stopped from creating “an international incident” while there. We used to like to put the Red, White, and Blue atop what we built back in those days. Was told that was a strict no go. Who knew? Looking back, we should have just gone ahead and flown our flag.
If the Greenland Inuit don't like Denmark practicing eugenics on them without permission, they should probably do a quick consult with other native peoples in US jurisdiction before hopping out of that particular frying pan.
I suppose they're expected to just love all the military base building and natural resource extraction that the Don apparently has in mind for them?
The Pentagon will certainly not say "no" to more Forever War. They and their good friends in the so-called Defense Industrial Base are probably pulling the strings in the inner circles in the first place. Best we can hope for is a tactical "not yet" on the old bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb-Iran chorus.
Instead of appearing at his sentencing Trump should, at that exact time, schedule a mini press conference and tell everyone that attacking Iran at this point is unconstitutional and it is his expectation that the Congress should be involved and authorize an attack via a declaration of war.
I can dream.
He only has to appear via video
I would love to hear your thoughts on domestic terrorism and fireworks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Iqmr5HBuDo
There are certainly puzzling, even contradictory, statements being made; difficult to impossible to reconcile with physical evidence; what I'm not seeing is an agenda. I read his email, and much of it seemed out of wack to me.