Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EZ's avatar

read paragraphs 5 and 6 in Durhams filing on Friday.

>> https://t.co/NyT1bFvcRO <<

TL;DR: Joffe exploited access via his employer (Neustar) to DNS data in search of "dirt" on Trump. That access included EOP after Trump took office, and included Trump's apartment building complex before he took office, among others. The data and White papers Sussmann provided used CHERRY-PICKED DNS data -- Durham obtained complete DNS records from Joffe's former employer, and shows the supposedly suspicious pings of the IP address of some obscure Russian-made cell phone was made over 3 million times by people in the US not in the vicinity of the WH, and the first instance in the vicinity of the WH occurred in 2014, during the Obama Admin!

This corroborates SWC point that Durham is light years ahead of us amateur sleuths on the internet. He has much more info than we know about.

I agree with MW's take; Sussmann (and Danchenko as well, IMHO) should be seeking the best plea bargains they can get from Durham before he demolishes them in court. The naysayers neglect to consider an indictment does not have to reveal all of the prosecutor's evidence, or even the best evidence of guilt. It need only provide sufficient evidence of probable cause of the charged crime (though in many areas Durham goes beyond that to create speaking indictments, which foreshadow a deeper conspiracy.)

Expand full comment
EZ's avatar

Based on this latest filing, who is "Numero Uno" on Durham's indictment list?

I'll take Joffe and his internet research minions.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts