Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lawrence L.'s avatar

Only one thing to say about the GOP stepping up: "Haha!"

Expand full comment
dissonant1's avatar

I truly hate being skeptical. I really do. But when I evaluate predictive statements around politics I always look at history and financial data. The history shows that Republicans have not ultimately stood up against the medical or pharmaceutical establishments (including when Obamacare was being pushed). The financial data shows that Republicans in general have been recipients of pharma money nearly as much (and in some cases more) as the Dems. Take a look at the following (for example) and some of the names may surprise you:

https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/pfizer-inc/C00016683/candidate-recipients/2020

I realize that for any industry the standard lobbying practice is to contribute some to all in a ratio based on projected "winners" at any given time, and then to hedge your bets. But at the same time, accepted contributions equate to some degree of expected leverage. When have the Republicans ever exhibited concern over the accountable use of "our" money in the medical services, equipment, or pharmaceutical industries vs. the leverage inherent with the contributions they have received? And of course leverage does not entirely reside with monetary contributions.

Many (most?) of us who might be inclined to vote Republican do so based on principles. After all that is what Republicans have been selling us on for what, 90 years? But the question becomes, just how strong are those principles within the GOPe when money is involved?

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts