The case in question is Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) et al. v. Alberto Carvalho—Carvalho is the superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). LAUSD still has a mandate in place for all employees, requiring them to participate in a medical experiment, via mRNA injection. HFDF is suing on several grounds. Most importantly, in my opinion, is the contention that the mandate is “arbitrary.” The case was dismissed by the District Court on flimsy grounds—it seems clear that the judge was simply dodging responsibility. The case is now in front of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and just had oral arguments. An official for HFDF discusses the case and what happened at the oral arguments at Brownstone Institute:
My 26 OCT 2021 e-mail to the school secretary: [Now, E.D. Cal. 9th Cir. 1:22-01468-DAD-DB]
I will cover but not without saying what’s on my mind.
How are all these jobs not getting filled? Yet, the district threatens me, who they consider “non-vaccinated” (even though I have the COVID antibodies) suspension without pay if I don’t get discriminatorily COVID tested weekly? The state is discriminating against perceived immunity vs actual immunity. I’m about to call the district’s bluff and go untested, or at least not share my test results with the district, so they can scramble looking for more non-existent subs.
This is about the 15th time I’ve subbed on my prep this year. I have no problem helping out when I can, however I’m less likely to volunteer when I’m being threated leave without pay despite being indistinguishably immune regardless of my perceived vaccine status. The CDC lists three forms of immunity natural immunity, vaccine-induce immunity, or passive immunity yet only vaccine status, which only reveals the probability of vaccine-induced acquired immunity, is what’s being used to arbitrarily discriminate against actual acquired immunity regardless of how it was obtained.
I have documented acquired immunity and the state does not need to know how I acquired it in order to maintain a safe work environment. FYI, the DO is fully aware of my complaint about the state’s baseless mandate as well, so no need to inform HR of this email. I simply wanted to let you know why I’m not jumping at the opportunity to help out anymore when there is a shortage of coverage, while at the same time, I’m threatened with leave without pay which would simply exacerbate the substitute coverage issues the district is already experiencing.
Again, I will cover for the 6th period shortage but I wish the government wasn’t baselessly threatening my pay or employment status while simultaneously needing my coverage for employee shortages.
I will go to [redacted] room. A6 is the correct room right?
Why sad? These people's stories are inspiring, encouraging & uplifting unless one thinks there should never be any obstacles or injustices to overcome in life. I've never lived on that planet!
It’s uplifting the spirit of the people that stood, annd are standing against this Covid tyranny, and with the sacrifice entailed.
It’s sad / upsetting that one case was dropped after 2 years with no negative ramifications for the government (Australia), and some are still ongoing, the continued financial freezing shocked me. I hope there is some court rulings that stop this dictatorial efforts.
Now that the dust has somewhat settled after two+ years of government and media driven hysteria over a virus that had a 99% survival rate on average, the clearer picture is coming into focus. The general public now knows they were lied to about the "vaccine,' but most just wanted to do their part to continue with life at the time never imagining the potential side effects on their future health.
What little trust remains in government institutions after The Great Covid Scare, particularly those involved with health, will be evidenced by how successful the Pfizer commercials currently being aired are for the new Covid variant. Except for the true believers whose heads are firmly buried in the sand, I don't foresee a great demand for adding insult to injury. How the government and its media propagandists react to a rejection of further 'therapeutic' injections will be the tell. I would note, however, that a therapeutic should not cause future harm to the individual. So, that term seems to be inappropriate at best.
Mark, have you read about Dr Peter McCullogh’s speech to the European Parliament recently? Wow! Read summary on Jeff Childers Substack today. Then tried to google it and google shadowbans searches for it.
Yeah, pretty wow--thanks. Of the 4.2% he talks about around the 13 minute mark, I'd love to see more of a profile, esp. age. My expectation is that that would be a fairly young group--under 50? When you think about it in those terms, that's a potentially huge demographic hit.
So if the technocrats and lawyers rescind a bad policy, they are no longer liable? In this case they should be liable (in a just polis) for the damages to health and quality of living their policies caused to employees and their families. Ostensibly the harms extend to the student population, but then, its public school. IMO, students better off being truant.
And the recent interview on Meet The Press (tinyurl.com/5n942rh2) seems a bit of a head scratcher also. He says Dems & Repubs can come together on something like a 15-week federal limit to abortions, but with the mile-wide loophole of 'except if a doctor says the mother's life is at risk,' and that this will put the abortion issue behind us once and for all. He also says the heartbeat laws in some states, where abortion is limited to shorter periods, like 6 weeks, are terrible.
I assume he's trying to go for independents and "moderate" Dems in the general, and maybe it will work, but re-nationalizing the issue after the recent victory to send it to the states sure doesn't feel right to me.
It should go without saying, btw, but I'll play it safe anyway and just say it: I despise Meet The Press and all that other crap with the fury of a galaxy of suns. All going nova in unison. When the interviewer kept yammering "No one is in favor of abortion that late, Mr. President (5, 6, 7 months). No one is arguing to allow it that late," I wanted to throw up.
My comment's about Trump's latest abortion position, nothing else.
Better than Biden is a very low bar. RFK jr only ensures the transition to climate change madness and his willingness to challenge the CDC and WHO is really the fundamental argument for every pretender to the high chair of the White House. Too often the right is smitten by those who might speak to our desires and we are always left wanting what they promised and never deliver. It’s going to take the hard road of involvement for all of us to change the wave coming for us. We can’t sit this one out waiting for a savior that will never come. IMHO
My 26 OCT 2021 e-mail to the school secretary: [Now, E.D. Cal. 9th Cir. 1:22-01468-DAD-DB]
I will cover but not without saying what’s on my mind.
How are all these jobs not getting filled? Yet, the district threatens me, who they consider “non-vaccinated” (even though I have the COVID antibodies) suspension without pay if I don’t get discriminatorily COVID tested weekly? The state is discriminating against perceived immunity vs actual immunity. I’m about to call the district’s bluff and go untested, or at least not share my test results with the district, so they can scramble looking for more non-existent subs.
This is about the 15th time I’ve subbed on my prep this year. I have no problem helping out when I can, however I’m less likely to volunteer when I’m being threated leave without pay despite being indistinguishably immune regardless of my perceived vaccine status. The CDC lists three forms of immunity natural immunity, vaccine-induce immunity, or passive immunity yet only vaccine status, which only reveals the probability of vaccine-induced acquired immunity, is what’s being used to arbitrarily discriminate against actual acquired immunity regardless of how it was obtained.
I have documented acquired immunity and the state does not need to know how I acquired it in order to maintain a safe work environment. FYI, the DO is fully aware of my complaint about the state’s baseless mandate as well, so no need to inform HR of this email. I simply wanted to let you know why I’m not jumping at the opportunity to help out anymore when there is a shortage of coverage, while at the same time, I’m threatened with leave without pay which would simply exacerbate the substitute coverage issues the district is already experiencing.
Again, I will cover for the 6th period shortage but I wish the government wasn’t baselessly threatening my pay or employment status while simultaneously needing my coverage for employee shortages.
I will go to [redacted] room. A6 is the correct room right?
Sad update, oh Canada!
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/the-covid-protesters-where-are-they
Why sad? These people's stories are inspiring, encouraging & uplifting unless one thinks there should never be any obstacles or injustices to overcome in life. I've never lived on that planet!
It’s uplifting the spirit of the people that stood, annd are standing against this Covid tyranny, and with the sacrifice entailed.
It’s sad / upsetting that one case was dropped after 2 years with no negative ramifications for the government (Australia), and some are still ongoing, the continued financial freezing shocked me. I hope there is some court rulings that stop this dictatorial efforts.
Now that the dust has somewhat settled after two+ years of government and media driven hysteria over a virus that had a 99% survival rate on average, the clearer picture is coming into focus. The general public now knows they were lied to about the "vaccine,' but most just wanted to do their part to continue with life at the time never imagining the potential side effects on their future health.
What little trust remains in government institutions after The Great Covid Scare, particularly those involved with health, will be evidenced by how successful the Pfizer commercials currently being aired are for the new Covid variant. Except for the true believers whose heads are firmly buried in the sand, I don't foresee a great demand for adding insult to injury. How the government and its media propagandists react to a rejection of further 'therapeutic' injections will be the tell. I would note, however, that a therapeutic should not cause future harm to the individual. So, that term seems to be inappropriate at best.
Mark, have you read about Dr Peter McCullogh’s speech to the European Parliament recently? Wow! Read summary on Jeff Childers Substack today. Then tried to google it and google shadowbans searches for it.
Here are two links i found.
https://www.americaoutloud.news/dr-mcculloughs-speech-at-the-european-parliament/
https://www.newswars.com/must-watch-dr-mccullough-exposes-big-pharma-covid-jabs-wuhan-lab-in-european-parliament-speech/
Yeah, pretty wow--thanks. Of the 4.2% he talks about around the 13 minute mark, I'd love to see more of a profile, esp. age. My expectation is that that would be a fairly young group--under 50? When you think about it in those terms, that's a potentially huge demographic hit.
I've seen numerous claims that large numbers of batches were basically placebos. Can't verify that, but ...
Even if the shots did work as intended, still shouldn't be able to mandate it at any level of government. That should be the case law and precedent.
So if the technocrats and lawyers rescind a bad policy, they are no longer liable? In this case they should be liable (in a just polis) for the damages to health and quality of living their policies caused to employees and their families. Ostensibly the harms extend to the student population, but then, its public school. IMO, students better off being truant.
Lausd will rescind the mandate, guaranteed.
Will the court allow it to be moot is another question. My guess is probably, but I hope I’m wrong.
I could not figure out who the judges were on the panel. You can tell a lot by who was President when they were confirmed.
And the District Judge Consuelo Marshall? She’s like 99 years old and couldn’t make a ruling until instructed by a superior court? Get outta town.
Jimmy Carter Judge
African American
Female
Born 1936 in Tn, experienced segregation
86 years old
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/newsletters/Fairness_Winter2022.pdf
It would be amazing if Judge Roberts was correct on Judges not having political leanings.
Call it diversity.
Not so sure, Rascal. I think they've got as much as they can out of the Scamdemic. On to the next Big Scary Thing.
Ebola seems to be the fashionable choice of the Soros, Klaus and Gates cabal.
And I'm sure they already have a "vaccine" ready too.
Nipah- and our friends in Wuhan, and all the usual bff’s are in!
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/viral-go-round-sunday-september-17?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
I saw signs in Mx for monkeypox.
Ray, you are a font of information and links, thanks! If not by bio weapons then by geoengineering. https://elizabethnickson.substack.com/p/megadeath-the-global-conspiracy-to?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=30495&post_id=137101029&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=8t0x5&utm_medium=email
I was surprised on my visit to Mx seeing the monkeypox sign at the Cancun Airport, especially with how monkeypox is spread…
Removed at Mike's request.
And the recent interview on Meet The Press (tinyurl.com/5n942rh2) seems a bit of a head scratcher also. He says Dems & Repubs can come together on something like a 15-week federal limit to abortions, but with the mile-wide loophole of 'except if a doctor says the mother's life is at risk,' and that this will put the abortion issue behind us once and for all. He also says the heartbeat laws in some states, where abortion is limited to shorter periods, like 6 weeks, are terrible.
I assume he's trying to go for independents and "moderate" Dems in the general, and maybe it will work, but re-nationalizing the issue after the recent victory to send it to the states sure doesn't feel right to me.
It should go without saying, btw, but I'll play it safe anyway and just say it: I despise Meet The Press and all that other crap with the fury of a galaxy of suns. All going nova in unison. When the interviewer kept yammering "No one is in favor of abortion that late, Mr. President (5, 6, 7 months). No one is arguing to allow it that late," I wanted to throw up.
My comment's about Trump's latest abortion position, nothing else.
He's not an option.
I don't get it. Who is "he"?
Sorry Brad, I missed that. I thought "he" was RFK! Now I'm really depressed.
Yep. Same.
He apparently kinda flubbed a trans question. These all should have been softball questions for him.
RFK Jr. is an anti 2nd amendment leftist. Next!
There are many, many reasons why he's unacceptable.
His latest about promising to ban fracking is just out there. WAY out there.
But still far better than Biden?
Better than Biden is a very low bar. RFK jr only ensures the transition to climate change madness and his willingness to challenge the CDC and WHO is really the fundamental argument for every pretender to the high chair of the White House. Too often the right is smitten by those who might speak to our desires and we are always left wanting what they promised and never deliver. It’s going to take the hard road of involvement for all of us to change the wave coming for us. We can’t sit this one out waiting for a savior that will never come. IMHO
This: "RFK jr only ensures the transition to climate change madness"