Indicted Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann’s lawyers have responded to Special Counsel John Durham’s motion regarding their rather clear conflicts of representation. That’s not really the point, since Sussmann himself says he’s totally down with his lawyers having conflicts. What has turned out to be rather interesting is that Sussmann’s lawyers, the law firm of Latham & Watkins, is all in a huff about Durham revealing at least a bit of what he knows about the activities of Sussmann and tech exec Rodney Joffe (not yet indicted).
I keep wondering how the same criminal cabal that staged a successful coup d'etat and installed Chauncey Gardiner in the office without literally one leak or whistleblower, didn't kill the Durham baby in the crib, meaning before ANY indictments. It wasn't as if anyone would've batted an eye, including Sundance. It was expected. It appeared at the time of the fraudulant election that Bondo was bailing on Trump and I remember articles at the time talking about Barr setting up Durham to be cancelled, something about his being an employee of the DOJ at the time of his appointment. Did Barr in fact appoint Durham? If Durham is in fact not part of the coverup, why would Barr do that if he were watching out for the deep state? After the spectacle of a sitting judge debasing his office and the judiciary 5 ways to Sunday to taint General Flynn it strains credulity Merrick Garland couldn't be prevailed upon to stop Durham at probably minimal political cost, and the cabal doesn't appear to mind the politics any longer anyway, at least not where the dementia patient is concerned. Set Durham's case aside for just a moment, doesn't there have to be significant forces at play behind the scenes , a struggle if you will hidden from view that explains the sudden emergence into the zeitgeist of the Durham chronicles?
Getting alot of messages asking what is next, or what to look for.
This is it folks. Read this.
John Durham will show the attribution of the DNC hacks stemmed from work done by Rodney Joffe.
Thats game over.
And its going to happen.
>>> FOOL NELSON@FOOL_NELSON
FOOL's Tasseography: The person spying on Trump and pushing the Alfa Bank comms story, Rodney Joffe, also colluded with Georgia Tech researchers to attribute the DNC hack to the GRU, leading to Mueller indictment. Sussmann also shared everything Crowdstrike gave him with Joffe. <<<
One thing I've been wondering about; what offices did the Trump transition team operate out of (GSA provides the office space,) and was it part of the EOP complex? Or, if not part of EOP complex, did Joffe and his merry minions have access to the DNS data for the transition team's internet activity?
A curious side note: recall Mueller got all the computer data of the Trump transition team supposedly from GSA, without even asking the Trump admin if they would authorize its release to Mueller. I'm beginning to wonder if certain people in Mueller's Goon Squad had advanced access to transition team data by way of Joffe, and then leaned on GSA to provide the all the data, in part, to provide cover for the peek under the hood that Mueller's goon's enjoyed via Joffe's "digital Peeping-Tom" act.
I keep wondering how the same criminal cabal that staged a successful coup d'etat and installed Chauncey Gardiner in the office without literally one leak or whistleblower, didn't kill the Durham baby in the crib, meaning before ANY indictments. It wasn't as if anyone would've batted an eye, including Sundance. It was expected. It appeared at the time of the fraudulant election that Bondo was bailing on Trump and I remember articles at the time talking about Barr setting up Durham to be cancelled, something about his being an employee of the DOJ at the time of his appointment. Did Barr in fact appoint Durham? If Durham is in fact not part of the coverup, why would Barr do that if he were watching out for the deep state? After the spectacle of a sitting judge debasing his office and the judiciary 5 ways to Sunday to taint General Flynn it strains credulity Merrick Garland couldn't be prevailed upon to stop Durham at probably minimal political cost, and the cabal doesn't appear to mind the politics any longer anyway, at least not where the dementia patient is concerned. Set Durham's case aside for just a moment, doesn't there have to be significant forces at play behind the scenes , a struggle if you will hidden from view that explains the sudden emergence into the zeitgeist of the Durham chronicles?
Interesting speculation:
>>Ryan M@RyanM58699717
Getting alot of messages asking what is next, or what to look for.
This is it folks. Read this.
John Durham will show the attribution of the DNC hacks stemmed from work done by Rodney Joffe.
Thats game over.
And its going to happen.
>>> FOOL NELSON@FOOL_NELSON
FOOL's Tasseography: The person spying on Trump and pushing the Alfa Bank comms story, Rodney Joffe, also colluded with Georgia Tech researchers to attribute the DNC hack to the GRU, leading to Mueller indictment. Sussmann also shared everything Crowdstrike gave him with Joffe. <<<
<<
>> https://twitter.com/RyanM58699717/status/1493402310034305025 <<
Hope springs eternal.
One thing I've been wondering about; what offices did the Trump transition team operate out of (GSA provides the office space,) and was it part of the EOP complex? Or, if not part of EOP complex, did Joffe and his merry minions have access to the DNS data for the transition team's internet activity?
A curious side note: recall Mueller got all the computer data of the Trump transition team supposedly from GSA, without even asking the Trump admin if they would authorize its release to Mueller. I'm beginning to wonder if certain people in Mueller's Goon Squad had advanced access to transition team data by way of Joffe, and then leaned on GSA to provide the all the data, in part, to provide cover for the peek under the hood that Mueller's goon's enjoyed via Joffe's "digital Peeping-Tom" act.