We wrote previously about the Swedish study (University of Malmo) that concluded that Pfizer’s mRNA injections do, in fact, alter human DNA—reverse transcription.
reverse transcription is a property of retroviruses like HIV. The Pfizer vaccine is clipped from the covid virus which isn't a retrovirus and doesn't have that property. McCullough is a cardiac doctor who ought to stick to the field he knows something about which isn't virology.
Reverse transcription is not a property of a virus. It's a process in which DNA is synthesized from an RNA template. Retroviruses are characterized by the presence of an enzyme (reverse trsanscriptase) that catalyzes this synthensis. That does not mean that reverse transcription is a "propety" of retroviruses, and it does not mean that reverse transcription is impossible with any virus that is not a retrovirus.
Some scientists wrote a paper saying they've demonstrated in-vitro the presence of an enyzme that was found to synthesize some of the SARS-COV-2 RNA into human DNA. That paper should stand or fall on its own merits and not be ruled out of court by a hasty generalization "proving" that what the paper concludes is false. That's not the way scientific argumentaiton should be done. Do you have some reason to rush to this conclusion?
As for Dr. McCullough, he's quoting from a paper here and giving some minimal explanation of what the paper says, along with a very clear qualificaiton that much work needs to be done to validate and confirm the paper's findings. If you want to play the game of discounting someone's speech because they don't have the proper credentials, then you should be challenging the credentials of the authors of the paper, not the guy who read from it and pointed out how serious a problem it will be if the paper is found to be correct.
I said no such thing. I merely said that a paper has been presented which makes that claim and it deserves to be read and considered. I'm not an expert on this. I'm advocating maintaining an open mind to credentialed experts and not trying to silence them with a hasty generalization or an ad hominem attack.
No ones knows how the criminals at Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson designed their vaccines and for that matter for what nefarious purpose beyond profit. Wake up to the fact that we are now ruled by those that have no more regard for the masses of the world than most people have for an ant colony.
"No ones knows how the criminals at Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson "
J&J is a viral vector vaccine. That technology goes back to the 1970s and isn't a mystery. He lumped J&J in with the two mRNAs which are controversial. Can you point out where he said he knew that J&J is different?
I don't know what he knows or doesn't know. I just think you read more into his statement than he actually said. I get that he was associating the vaccines together, but all he actually said was that they'er the same because they're all made by criminals. Pretty thin basis to accuse him of fundamental ignorance.
What about future blood transfusions? Do we have to separate now? No reproduction with the vaxxed? Two genetic pools and cross "pollination" could be deadly for the půrbloods or any cross produced children.
Dr. McCullough didn't "go there" . . . and I really hope that it isn't the case, but the spike protein being produced could be lethal enough over time to kill off the "carriers" in the population. Damn all the evil ones who foisted the experimental gene therapy agents on humanity, may they be tried, convicted and executed.
The UK data is replicated--at least to a great extent--in many, if not most, countries that have been heavily injected.
Re "endless variants", that's inevitable and arises from the virus as a whole, not from the genetic mod. Endless variants isn't what scares McCullough. What scares him is the prospect of a seemingly irreversible mod of the human genome to produce a protein that attacks the human organism in multiple ways. Now a part of our DNA, if this is true.
Well, I received the first two shots (Moderna) back when I thought it would get my life back. Was in LE at the time and was one of the first in line in my state - NH. What a fool I was. My gut told me to wait a year or so and see how things worked out. Boy, do I wish I had that decision back. I'm not boosted and never will be. Now, after two years the WuFlu has arrived. Not sure where I got it but its here. Very tough body aches, serious headache and what is worrisome for me, it has made it into my lungs. Been taking Ivermectin since about 24-48 into it so I should be ok. In fairly decent shape for my age (55) after 30 years of LE and Army so on the outer edge of having to be too concerned. When I see these comments by Dr. McCullough, a person I've grown to respect for the stand he has taken, it enrages me that I have this crap rolling around inside me. It enrages me more to know that my daughter took two shots as well after being told by her university that if she didn't she would be dropped from her major (athletic training). My son refused the shot and I couldn't be more proud of the young man. If it is ever conclusively proven that the people in these companies knew that this mRNA tech was for purposes other than a sincere attempt to help people, the Bastille outta look like a sandcastle at the beach. As a quick aside, a good friend of mine lives fairly close to a Moderna exec - in the Boston area. Says the guy is building an addition on his already substantial house the size of the Empire State building.
Rascal, thank you for that. I have been taking Ivermectin for about 5 days and have another 5 days to run. Got a little stash thanks to a place in Florida. It was expensive but worth having around, especially for my wife for when she gets it. I also take Zinc, Vit D, Quercitin, multi-vitamins, etc. All of this thanks to reading during these past couple of years. I will implement some of these other things as well. Maybe a saving grace is that I was jabbed a long time ago and made it through w/o any immediate, serious side effects. Hopefully my insides have reached some sort of stasis comparable with normalcy.
Who exactly will be determining the state of mental illness, and therefore needs help in dying? It certainly couldn’t be the people with mental illness themselves. So some proxy will be needed. “Hi, I’m from the government and I’m here to help!” Ronald Reagan was right. Scariest words ever.
Zhou and Nan have been injected multiple times. Does this mean their behavioral problems aren't a coincidence? Of course, their behavioral issues predate Covid ...
Here’s an article about the Swedish study, which had a link to the site it was published on. I included the pdf of the actual study.
https://en.protothema.gr/pfizer-mrna-vaccine-goes-into-liver-and-changes-into-dna-swedish-study-finds/
https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/cimb/cimb-44-00073/article_deploy/cimb-44-00073.pdf
reverse transcription is a property of retroviruses like HIV. The Pfizer vaccine is clipped from the covid virus which isn't a retrovirus and doesn't have that property. McCullough is a cardiac doctor who ought to stick to the field he knows something about which isn't virology.
Reverse transcription is not a property of a virus. It's a process in which DNA is synthesized from an RNA template. Retroviruses are characterized by the presence of an enzyme (reverse trsanscriptase) that catalyzes this synthensis. That does not mean that reverse transcription is a "propety" of retroviruses, and it does not mean that reverse transcription is impossible with any virus that is not a retrovirus.
Some scientists wrote a paper saying they've demonstrated in-vitro the presence of an enyzme that was found to synthesize some of the SARS-COV-2 RNA into human DNA. That paper should stand or fall on its own merits and not be ruled out of court by a hasty generalization "proving" that what the paper concludes is false. That's not the way scientific argumentaiton should be done. Do you have some reason to rush to this conclusion?
As for Dr. McCullough, he's quoting from a paper here and giving some minimal explanation of what the paper says, along with a very clear qualificaiton that much work needs to be done to validate and confirm the paper's findings. If you want to play the game of discounting someone's speech because they don't have the proper credentials, then you should be challenging the credentials of the authors of the paper, not the guy who read from it and pointed out how serious a problem it will be if the paper is found to be correct.
So show us your source proving that viruses other than retroviruses do it.
I said no such thing. I merely said that a paper has been presented which makes that claim and it deserves to be read and considered. I'm not an expert on this. I'm advocating maintaining an open mind to credentialed experts and not trying to silence them with a hasty generalization or an ad hominem attack.
No ones knows how the criminals at Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson designed their vaccines and for that matter for what nefarious purpose beyond profit. Wake up to the fact that we are now ruled by those that have no more regard for the masses of the world than most people have for an ant colony.
J&J isn't an mRNA vaccine. Maybe you should study up more.
I'm looking for the place where George Shevchuk said that J&J is an mRNA vaccine. Can you point it out to me?
"No ones knows how the criminals at Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson "
J&J is a viral vector vaccine. That technology goes back to the 1970s and isn't a mystery. He lumped J&J in with the two mRNAs which are controversial. Can you point out where he said he knew that J&J is different?
I don't know what he knows or doesn't know. I just think you read more into his statement than he actually said. I get that he was associating the vaccines together, but all he actually said was that they'er the same because they're all made by criminals. Pretty thin basis to accuse him of fundamental ignorance.
What about future blood transfusions? Do we have to separate now? No reproduction with the vaxxed? Two genetic pools and cross "pollination" could be deadly for the půrbloods or any cross produced children.
Very interesting article: Naming Names
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/naming-names
Dr. McCullough didn't "go there" . . . and I really hope that it isn't the case, but the spike protein being produced could be lethal enough over time to kill off the "carriers" in the population. Damn all the evil ones who foisted the experimental gene therapy agents on humanity, may they be tried, convicted and executed.
Hmmm. Perpetual creation of Spikes + Non-Sterilizing --> Endless variants.
UK Data showing that 92% of deaths are fully vaxed.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/12/distracted-boris-kyiv-fully-vaccinated-92-percent-covid-deaths/
:-(
The UK data is replicated--at least to a great extent--in many, if not most, countries that have been heavily injected.
Re "endless variants", that's inevitable and arises from the virus as a whole, not from the genetic mod. Endless variants isn't what scares McCullough. What scares him is the prospect of a seemingly irreversible mod of the human genome to produce a protein that attacks the human organism in multiple ways. Now a part of our DNA, if this is true.
Well, I received the first two shots (Moderna) back when I thought it would get my life back. Was in LE at the time and was one of the first in line in my state - NH. What a fool I was. My gut told me to wait a year or so and see how things worked out. Boy, do I wish I had that decision back. I'm not boosted and never will be. Now, after two years the WuFlu has arrived. Not sure where I got it but its here. Very tough body aches, serious headache and what is worrisome for me, it has made it into my lungs. Been taking Ivermectin since about 24-48 into it so I should be ok. In fairly decent shape for my age (55) after 30 years of LE and Army so on the outer edge of having to be too concerned. When I see these comments by Dr. McCullough, a person I've grown to respect for the stand he has taken, it enrages me that I have this crap rolling around inside me. It enrages me more to know that my daughter took two shots as well after being told by her university that if she didn't she would be dropped from her major (athletic training). My son refused the shot and I couldn't be more proud of the young man. If it is ever conclusively proven that the people in these companies knew that this mRNA tech was for purposes other than a sincere attempt to help people, the Bastille outta look like a sandcastle at the beach. As a quick aside, a good friend of mine lives fairly close to a Moderna exec - in the Boston area. Says the guy is building an addition on his already substantial house the size of the Empire State building.
And with the FOIA disclosures we now know that they knew better than to loose this on the population.
Rascal, thank you for that. I have been taking Ivermectin for about 5 days and have another 5 days to run. Got a little stash thanks to a place in Florida. It was expensive but worth having around, especially for my wife for when she gets it. I also take Zinc, Vit D, Quercitin, multi-vitamins, etc. All of this thanks to reading during these past couple of years. I will implement some of these other things as well. Maybe a saving grace is that I was jabbed a long time ago and made it through w/o any immediate, serious side effects. Hopefully my insides have reached some sort of stasis comparable with normalcy.
Wonder if that could play a part & tie into this article I saw a few days ago?
https://nationalpost.com/health/canada-mental-illness-maid-medical-aid-in-dying
Who exactly will be determining the state of mental illness, and therefore needs help in dying? It certainly couldn’t be the people with mental illness themselves. So some proxy will be needed. “Hi, I’m from the government and I’m here to help!” Ronald Reagan was right. Scariest words ever.
Zhou and Nan have been injected multiple times. Does this mean their behavioral problems aren't a coincidence? Of course, their behavioral issues predate Covid ...
Yes.
Ah, thanks!
So much out there about Remdesivir. Criminal.