Recall that some little time ago, way back in December, I referenced Dem ueber strategist Ruy Teixeira’s concerns about The Democrats’ Hispanic Voter Problem (It's Not As Bad As You Think—It’s Worse). Today at American Thinker is an article that notes that Teixeira has added another demographic to his worry list:
1. What if anything does this portend for the Open Border Policy of the Criminal Cartel now in power? The policy is based upon these same assumptions that they can remake the American electorate by importing a new electorate (following the UK model). If, however, the imports are not going to support Cartel policies then the border has to be shut asap.
2. This supports my theory that American elections are more rigged than we ever thought. The popular notion is that "blue" jurisdictions vote in these manageries of horrible politicians (and so the popular nostrum "they get what they deserve" ). If, however, every minority group has increasingly turned against the Democrazis, how to explain the continuing electoral blowouts in these so called Blue cities? It's likely that the gangsters have rigged the system so thoroughly in those places that the results are simply matched up w raw demographics and a false narrative. I.e., if NYC has 30% Hispanic voters, 30% black voters, 30% white voters and 10% Asian voters, the system spits out a result that fits the narrative of overwhelming minority support within the turnout numbers. Actual voting hardly figures into it. Once people figure out that minorities do not overwhelmingly support Democrazis, the rigging will be harder to pull off. Stay tuned.
Well written and to the point! The DNC has embraced the worst views in America since May of 2020. The beginning of the actual Insurrection. So well deserved that many Hispanics and Asians are fleeing this morally bankrupt party.
The modern Democratic Party was founded in 1826. But it is true that they have been the source of almost every social ill the country has suffered since.
Germany was de-Nazified after WW II. The Union did not try to de-[ironically named]Democratified the US after the Civil War. Probably because all the venom in the Democratic Party would have simply migrated to a new party.
Yeah, you can cut the irony with a knife and in accordance with that I love Mark's title. The Dems would call Sailer a knuckle-dragging racist but at the same time their whole political program depends on and supports racial division based on racial differences. But gee, nobody told them ahead of time that not all of them "coloreds" are racists? Oops!
The question for us who are based seems to be does the narrative crumble, explode, or shapeshift and thereby avoid any significant impact with reality? I vaccilate between the hope that it will explode and the expectation that it will merely move it's goalposts (again) and move on. Don't know which is more likely or what kind of third option -crumbling /dissolving for example and how do we go on, how are the narrative peddlers treated, how are they prosecuted, how do we resolve the differences - will emerge.
Two things
1. What if anything does this portend for the Open Border Policy of the Criminal Cartel now in power? The policy is based upon these same assumptions that they can remake the American electorate by importing a new electorate (following the UK model). If, however, the imports are not going to support Cartel policies then the border has to be shut asap.
2. This supports my theory that American elections are more rigged than we ever thought. The popular notion is that "blue" jurisdictions vote in these manageries of horrible politicians (and so the popular nostrum "they get what they deserve" ). If, however, every minority group has increasingly turned against the Democrazis, how to explain the continuing electoral blowouts in these so called Blue cities? It's likely that the gangsters have rigged the system so thoroughly in those places that the results are simply matched up w raw demographics and a false narrative. I.e., if NYC has 30% Hispanic voters, 30% black voters, 30% white voters and 10% Asian voters, the system spits out a result that fits the narrative of overwhelming minority support within the turnout numbers. Actual voting hardly figures into it. Once people figure out that minorities do not overwhelmingly support Democrazis, the rigging will be harder to pull off. Stay tuned.
That's what they do, treat people as groups to manipulate versus as thinking individuals.
Well written and to the point! The DNC has embraced the worst views in America since May of 2020. The beginning of the actual Insurrection. So well deserved that many Hispanics and Asians are fleeing this morally bankrupt party.
The modern Democratic Party was founded in 1826. But it is true that they have been the source of almost every social ill the country has suffered since.
Germany was de-Nazified after WW II. The Union did not try to de-[ironically named]Democratified the US after the Civil War. Probably because all the venom in the Democratic Party would have simply migrated to a new party.
Yeah, you can cut the irony with a knife and in accordance with that I love Mark's title. The Dems would call Sailer a knuckle-dragging racist but at the same time their whole political program depends on and supports racial division based on racial differences. But gee, nobody told them ahead of time that not all of them "coloreds" are racists? Oops!
The question for us who are based seems to be does the narrative crumble, explode, or shapeshift and thereby avoid any significant impact with reality? I vaccilate between the hope that it will explode and the expectation that it will merely move it's goalposts (again) and move on. Don't know which is more likely or what kind of third option -crumbling /dissolving for example and how do we go on, how are the narrative peddlers treated, how are they prosecuted, how do we resolve the differences - will emerge.