As readers will know by now, DoJ has appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to stop Judge Cannon (at the District Court level) from appointing a special master to review the materials seized by the FBI on their raid of President Trump’s residence. I say “materials” because it seems that not only were documents seized but even articles of clothing were seized.
First, here’s a nine minute discussion of Judge Cannon’s decision with Kash Patel. This discussion occurred prior to the DoJ appeal but is informative regarding the decision to appoint a special master. Among other points, Patel notes, as I did, that the judge was pretty clearly unimpressed with DoJ and the FBI, based on the way the warrant was sought and the way it was executed:
Regarding the DoJ appeal, Nick Arama has a fairly thorough discussion.
DOJ Makes Move to Stop Appointment of Special Master for Trump Raid Docs
Here I’ll just excerpt the three claims DoJ is making:
They’re claiming first, that Trump doesn’t have any right to protection over those documents.
Second, they’re claiming there could be irreparable harm if they didn’t continue to have access to the material to assess the national security interests that might be involved. They’re also claiming there could be harm by sharing it with a special master.
Third, they argue granting a stay on analyzing those select records wouldn’t harm Trump.
For practical purposes, the DoJ position amounts to asserting that the Deep State—or, Intel Community, if you prefer—is the sole party for deciding such matters, simply by asserting that the documents (dunno about the clothing) are classified. DoJ is clearly implying that the courts should simply butt out if DoJ asserts a “national security” interest. Who thinks there aren’t qualified people with high level clearances to serve as special master? So what’s this about harm in sharing the docs with a special master. Why not John Ratcliffe? DoJ’s claims are, to me, quite shocking. I’d like to see them slapped down hard. Judges aren’t stupid, and the implications for our constitutional order aren’t hard to see.
A technical, but important, aspect of this DoJ appeal is that it was docketed as an “interlocutory appeal,” meaning, an appeal before a final decision on a given case. The key here is that interlocutory appeals are only allowed in certain circumstances. The question—which I’m not competent to address—then becomes: Does this appeal qualify?
https://amgreatness.com/2022/09/08/for-the-deep-state-trump-was-never-president/
How the deep state, the media, and the current president have treated Trump reveals that all the pious talk of Our Democracy™ is a pretext and a lie. For four years, they bent and broke every rule in the book in order to keep the people’s choice from governing. Today, they are breaking every rule to prevent him from becoming president again. This is the very opposite of democracy.
“Articles of clothing.” I know Melania is pretty hot—not my type but damn, but seriously DOJ, getting a warrant for a panty raid?
What I don’t understand is this—these guys couldn’t be bothered to take a proper inventory of the items they were seizing as they were packing it up and transporting it back to their field office. How can they now claim it will be dangerous for anyone to independently review it? Are they going to be more reckless than y’all were, keep sloppy records or none at all, establish no chain of custody—IANAL here but I would assume there would be problems if a prosecutor tried to introduce into evidence seized items in his possession that weren’t recorded on a receipt at the time of seizure?