What follows is a tentative effort at constructing a big picture narrative. I have no doubt that there’s much that needs development or correction. My hope is that it will stimulate reflection about the turmoil we’re seeing almost everywhere around us.
Continued gratitude for the cogent and Herculean effort to keep us up to speed with the latest machinations of Clown World. Mark, this post is not a criticism of your stellar work.
You asked: How did we get to this point? Is it possible to construct some sort of a timeline?
Understanding the context of the timeline to which you refer is an honest endeavor. Yet, in my opinion, it is a diversion without understanding the true macro-timeline of our history. Admittedly, I now spend less time monitoring and trying to understand current events in my search for “truth.” Sadly, a “truth” we will probably not be able to recover.
For me, it seems the train went off the tracks centuries ago. Could it be that we have been systematically brainwashed? Could we have been told fantastical, mind-blowing distortions and lies about where we live, who we are, our history and ancestors? Could we now be purposely distracted by debating issues at the delight of our controllers – issues that keep us entertained as we navigate through the trees after running off the road of our real history?
For those with a situational awareness of the avalanche of lies, an open-mind and patience, here’s a provocative (5 hours long) video chock-full of theories and hypotheses about our recent history: https://rumble.com/v1mujdf-tartaria-the-hidden-stolen-history.html I now wear the conspiracy theorist label as a badge of honor – because I’m convinced that real conspiracies exist and are hiding in plain sight - right under our collective noses. Those interested in exploring different interpretations of our history, checkout stolenhistory.net – do a search for anything from psychoanalysis to atmospheric energy, and anything in between.
Similarities: Both despised by the Intel Community and Deep State. Differences: One has decent lineage and credibility afforded by that one has the "Woke" crowd organized around socialism.
You mention the IC. At about the 21 minute mark in the Napolitano video Mark posted, Giraldi (ex-CIA) says some absolutely chilling truths, and these tie in to Tucker’s fate: “The media is essentially a spokesman for government policies all across the board.” He then names the agencies, State, Pentagon, IC, defense industry…and then says: “It [this collaboration] has destroyed our democracy…and there doesn’t seem to be any way out of this.” Judge N leaves it there.
Reminder that in recent months, Tucker had become the only prominent figure in US broadcast media who expressed skepticism of the US war posture in both Ukraine *and* Taiwan. Please name another prominent figure in US broadcast media who took such a view on these critical issues
the Duran guys think that Tucker was taken out because he gave a platform to RFK Jr. very recently. Plus he gave a platform to Trump as well. They are adamant that the Dems are not going to let RFK Jr get a foothold on mainstream media and thus to the slumbering American populace.
Rumors are swirling that the Dems will NOT hold primary debates, again preventing RFK Jr or any other candidate get in front of the American population.
Silenced on the eve of Zhou’s residential campaign announcement…what Tucker would have said we can only imagine! Hopefully he’ll find his voice elsewhere.
five days after he crosses the red line by acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their Pharma advertisers. Carlson’s breathtakingly courageous April 19 monologue broke TV’s two biggest rules: Tucker told the truth about how greedy Pharma advertisers controlled TV news content and he lambasted obsequious newscasters for promoting jabs they knew to be lethal and worthless. For many years, Tucker has had the nation's biggest audience averaging 3.5 million — 10 times the size of CNN. Fox just demonstrated the terrifying power of Big Pharma.
I think the 'why' is largely covered by two motives: 1) bio-war (labs in Ukraine, for example) and 2) depopulation (labs in Africa near outbreaks of Ebola, for example).
The article raises a lot of interesting issues. One that has long puzzled me is, the role of China. Given that the US was behind much/most of the funding and direction of the Wuhan lab, what was in it for China? They must have been in on it, as witness the fake scare videos, extreme lockdowns, etc. Could it be as simple as killing off old people, since China has a major demographic imbalance that will likely get worse? I don't know.
The monetary aspect is addressed by Luongo's theory of everything, although Simplicius takes the simpler view of "money printing", with no more, whereas Luongo views it in terms of a struggle between Powell and Davos, with Powell seeking to control and defang what Davos--the money printers--are up to. Davos, otoh, under this theory, is seeking a global debt default to usher in a global security state.
Big question: Can the ditch the dollar movement save us, albeit with great pain? And why is China now siding with Russia--why would they ever have cooperated with the Covid plot?
I'll offer on why the biolabs allowed in China, simply to ensure up-to-date know-how. Why would they say no to such an offer of in-house technology transfer? Dual use at that. Once the escape occurred in Wuhan, ensuring everyone else would have to face the same suck I believe was the goal. I don't think anyone knew ahead of time we'd go to lock-downs and masks and blow our own economic feet off for bad ideas. Once the $$ opportunity of a poor-"vaccine" became clear to the power grifters, they went for the money. (yes, I am aware of the pandemic scenario gaming that preceded the release; I don't buy a deliberate release. I think the gaming of scenarios was because these brilliant fools knew that plenty of labs were playing with viral genetic fire and an escape was inevitable. Yep, that foolish)
As for China siding with Russia, just taking advantage of a rare opportunity to join forces to get enough economic heft to drive the U.S. dollar off of world reserve status. I don't see China and Russia as being capable of supporting a stable partnership: they are an odd couple
China has been looking at alternative methods / technologies that nullify the United States military technology advantage. The gulf war was a shock to them. Bio Weapons, hacking, AI, Hypersonic Missiles, control of 5G, etc. are all priorities for China.
France was stupid enough to build China the state of the art bio lab, and got shut out of it.
The US bio warfare types wanted to do research not allowed in the US.
China has a history of bio lab leaks.
From what I can tell, you develop a virus / disease through gene splicing so you can then make a vaccine. That is “defensive” bio warfare research.
My guess, is China had a lab leak and decided to create a huge amount of fear to shut down the Western Economies and get rid of Trump, while using Covid to justify increasing their digital control of their own citizens.
It’s suspicious all the war gaming for this scenario that happened by western elites prior, as well as forecasts of this, and how hyped up it got by Who. Without Covid, I believe Trump would have been re-elected.
I clicked on the link and began to read the column at Foreign Policy...
"How far will mounting tensions with China be translated into the economic policy of the United States? After a rash of sanctions and overtly discriminatory legislation, with action on U.S. investment in China pending, and with talk of war increasingly commonplace in the United States, the Biden administration knows that it needs to clarify its economic relations with the country that is the largest U.S. trading partner outside North America."
I think Tooze means, "How loudly can neocons rattle their sabers at China while relying on China to keep producing everything that fills our houses and our businesses? After some panicky sanctions and protectionist legislation and threatening to invest our money at home, all of which fail to recognize America has no manufacturing base anymore and doesn't want one because of climate change, the Deep State knows it needs to extricate iself from the economic relationships between the Biden crime family and the country we send the most money to."
I picked December 2019 YTD trading partners at census.gov which was enlightening to me.
Mexico $615B = 256 exports to + 358 imports from
Canada $612B = 293 exports to + 320 imports from
China $559B = 107 exports to + 452 imports from, because it is just a hop and a skip away from Long Beach, California sure.
I didn't get pocket lint out of Tooze's packet of straw dogs. He poses a decent question ( "How far will mounting tension with China be translated into the economic policy of the United States?"), but then shambles around the hay kennel and ends with no structured answer. He doesn't state the rationale for Huawei sanctions, and uses a single Janet Yellen speech as quote fodder for his inside-baseball juxtapositions. My take away is that if this is what passes for serious thinking about US-China relations, well, no wonder!!
I saw someplace that Zhou declaring his candidacy somehow protects him from the investigations that appear to be exposing more of the corruption into the wider public’s conscience. The theory goes that somehow anybody that is investigating him can now be accused of interfering in an election and labeled a threat to democracy and an Insurrectionist. It brushes the investigation back by giving the msm the talking point and narrative that it is only because of dangerous and unfair politics that the investigations are occurring. It all about the Narrative. Doesn’t have to true or even logical.
Seems it only cuts in one direction: even though we know the Dems’ dark art of projection, they get to continue their vilainy under the cover of the msm and DS allies (Barr-Garland and co)…
Nope. The Marxist Left does not have to be logical, consistent, or “fair.” They need only a “Narrative” to use. One they can use loudly and forcibly. It is now about pretend on the surface, and brute power underlying it.
At this point impeachment proceedings against Biden should be initiated. It is the right thing to do, regardless of whether it would ultimately succeed.
The Biden Crime Family is arguably the most corrupt to ever occupy the WH--beyond all the other harm they have done to the country. If the country were functioning as a constitutional republic impeachment would be a no-brainer. As it is, political considerations will guide these decisions and will enter into the evaluation of "success".
Let's not sell the Clinton's short here. The Clinton's had a pretty good grift of their own going. What separates the two grifting families is time and conditions in the USA. The transformational decline and embrace of totalitarianism is farther along now than under Clinton. You would not hear about a stained blue dress today.
Leaving out the Arkancides, on the corruption side having drug addicted children is a red flag, but the Clinton Foundation is hard to beat.
What makes Biden the winner for most corrupt, is what was done to win the 2020 election and his involvement with Ukraine. Plus the continued jihad against Jan 6 useful idiots using the doj and fbi. Plus the vindictive lawfare against Trump.
Good point on the election fraud. Being so far down the totalitarian path what's taken place since Obama is startling. To be able to telegraph what they were up to, execute it with no push back, and then white washed away can only be accomplished in a totalitarian state reminiscent of Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany or Mao's China.
No doubt the Bidens are corrupt & greedy, but I think there are many unnamed corruptocrats that put Zhou up as their figurehead. Before Zhou is corrupt & greedy, he's a stupid nitwit.
Right, however I wasn't sure whether the peak Clinton corruption happened after leaving the WH, rather than while in it. Arkancide does get us to a totally 'nuther level.
except, wef/Davos are - through the folly of the Ukraine war (gets NATO neutered and the even bigger foolishness of sanctions drives loss of world reserve currency) - not in a controlling position any longer: "control" (of the physical and financial resources that enable world trade market freedom of movement) is shifting to China & Russia via a 'BRICS' structure. The awful stupidity is that a multi-polar world is both desirable and inevitable as formerly poor countries engage in a world economy and steadily become wealthier (and healthier and better educated and safer and better able to offer positive cultural inputs to the world). The notion of control to service US national interests "on the scale of the planet" is both insane and impossible. Now we are stuck with an ascendant odd couple in a tyrannical godless/freedomless China and a paranoid freedom-groping yet god-embracing righteously angered Russia for as long as it will take for China to turn on Russia (was it ever thus?). I do agree getting here involved financial machinations at the largest nation-state level, but I see little in the whole *hit-house that cannot be explained by grossly-broad, nasty, and very stupid corruption by our world-wide elites. The US is broke, blew shepherding a transition to a productive multi-polar world and so won't be trusted with helping get there. We are too resource rich and creative/dynamic a culture to be squashed, but pray God, help us to get it together quick
Dear Castelletto - I like your synthesis, but believe wef/davos can't project much cultural or institutional oomph because the EU and anglo-sphere are broke, and populations in the EU now can see how screwed up is climate change policy (see the Dutch political scene; brace for impact as Germany goes sideways over industries exiting the country due to insane energy costs; the mercantilist-based manufacturing unions are uber-unhappy; pretty much dittos for rest of EU + UK), not to mention the travesty of the Ukrain war. Wef/Davos increasingly has no juice, but we are (pace Tom Luongo's Theory of Everything) in for a culture-shifting economic adjustment: no cash, no soup for you!
Neocon and WEF/Davos believers have a lot of overlap. There are a few Neocons that are non Davos, but not a lot.
Non Wef neocons I would include:
- Bolton
- Pompeo
Leftist / Democrats Neocons i can’t think of any non WEF/Davos supporters.
Tony Blair is definitely a Davos and Neocon, and was a Marxist in college.
WEF / Davos has a become a Western Elite cult.
And interesting how BlackRock grew from Pres. Clinton onward due to government policies.
Gut feeling - a lot of Wef / Davos / Soros money is used to elect Western Politicians that back their policies. In the US the Democrats have a very rigid ideology politicians need to hew to get funding. An example is Democratic Black Politicians are silent on illegal immigration now days, in the past they were not.
Wef / Davos I got more clued in when a real estate forecaster brought it up as a way to explain California Policies, and even cautioned it sounded a bit tin foil territory. After reading Agenda 2030 and other Wef stuff, it explained the insane Ca policies.
Wef / Davos represents the western elites that have become indoctrinated into a groupthink, including politicians, business leaders, etc. and are deeply intertwined with the financialization of Western Economies.
Soros he just keeps getting associated with troubling stuff. From pushing policies and electing secretaries of states and district attorneys to color revolutions.
Neocons goal is spreading their vision of US power / influence / culture through any means necessary, including military, economic (sanctions), lawfare, non profits, and even revolutions / coups. The ends justifies the means Is the modus operandi.
Interesting thought experiment - why do they hate Trump so much?
Continued gratitude for the cogent and Herculean effort to keep us up to speed with the latest machinations of Clown World. Mark, this post is not a criticism of your stellar work.
You asked: How did we get to this point? Is it possible to construct some sort of a timeline?
Understanding the context of the timeline to which you refer is an honest endeavor. Yet, in my opinion, it is a diversion without understanding the true macro-timeline of our history. Admittedly, I now spend less time monitoring and trying to understand current events in my search for “truth.” Sadly, a “truth” we will probably not be able to recover.
For me, it seems the train went off the tracks centuries ago. Could it be that we have been systematically brainwashed? Could we have been told fantastical, mind-blowing distortions and lies about where we live, who we are, our history and ancestors? Could we now be purposely distracted by debating issues at the delight of our controllers – issues that keep us entertained as we navigate through the trees after running off the road of our real history?
For those with a situational awareness of the avalanche of lies, an open-mind and patience, here’s a provocative (5 hours long) video chock-full of theories and hypotheses about our recent history: https://rumble.com/v1mujdf-tartaria-the-hidden-stolen-history.html I now wear the conspiracy theorist label as a badge of honor – because I’m convinced that real conspiracies exist and are hiding in plain sight - right under our collective noses. Those interested in exploring different interpretations of our history, checkout stolenhistory.net – do a search for anything from psychoanalysis to atmospheric energy, and anything in between.
Hmm….
Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response
https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/
Thanks, will check out.
The NeoCons and the intelligence community will be the ones to elevate RFK jr. not having Democrat primary debates will necessitate this investment.
RFK vs. Bernie’s Presidential run - What are the similarities and differences?
Similarities: Both despised by the Intel Community and Deep State. Differences: One has decent lineage and credibility afforded by that one has the "Woke" crowd organized around socialism.
You mention the IC. At about the 21 minute mark in the Napolitano video Mark posted, Giraldi (ex-CIA) says some absolutely chilling truths, and these tie in to Tucker’s fate: “The media is essentially a spokesman for government policies all across the board.” He then names the agencies, State, Pentagon, IC, defense industry…and then says: “It [this collaboration] has destroyed our democracy…and there doesn’t seem to be any way out of this.” Judge N leaves it there.
Has anyone dusted Tucker’s back to check for Paul Ryan’s fingerprints?
Michael Tracey
@mtracey
Reminder that in recent months, Tucker had become the only prominent figure in US broadcast media who expressed skepticism of the US war posture in both Ukraine *and* Taiwan. Please name another prominent figure in US broadcast media who took such a view on these critical issues
the Duran guys think that Tucker was taken out because he gave a platform to RFK Jr. very recently. Plus he gave a platform to Trump as well. They are adamant that the Dems are not going to let RFK Jr get a foothold on mainstream media and thus to the slumbering American populace.
Rumors are swirling that the Dems will NOT hold primary debates, again preventing RFK Jr or any other candidate get in front of the American population.
Silenced on the eve of Zhou’s residential campaign announcement…what Tucker would have said we can only imagine! Hopefully he’ll find his voice elsewhere.
Tucker has gored just about every liberal ox you can think of since 2020. Take your pick of which straw broke the camel's back.
Tucker made the right enemies
Jim Rickards retweeted:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
Fox fires
@TuckerCarlson
five days after he crosses the red line by acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their Pharma advertisers. Carlson’s breathtakingly courageous April 19 monologue broke TV’s two biggest rules: Tucker told the truth about how greedy Pharma advertisers controlled TV news content and he lambasted obsequious newscasters for promoting jabs they knew to be lethal and worthless. For many years, Tucker has had the nation's biggest audience averaging 3.5 million — 10 times the size of CNN. Fox just demonstrated the terrifying power of Big Pharma.
This map of us Gov bio labs puzzles me. Why these locations?
Scroll down the article to get to the map:
https://darkfutura.substack.com/p/epidemic-diffusion-the-hijack-of
Another substack of
SIMPLICIUS THE THINKER.
Thanks for sharing the link, Ray.
I think the 'why' is largely covered by two motives: 1) bio-war (labs in Ukraine, for example) and 2) depopulation (labs in Africa near outbreaks of Ebola, for example).
The article raises a lot of interesting issues. One that has long puzzled me is, the role of China. Given that the US was behind much/most of the funding and direction of the Wuhan lab, what was in it for China? They must have been in on it, as witness the fake scare videos, extreme lockdowns, etc. Could it be as simple as killing off old people, since China has a major demographic imbalance that will likely get worse? I don't know.
The monetary aspect is addressed by Luongo's theory of everything, although Simplicius takes the simpler view of "money printing", with no more, whereas Luongo views it in terms of a struggle between Powell and Davos, with Powell seeking to control and defang what Davos--the money printers--are up to. Davos, otoh, under this theory, is seeking a global debt default to usher in a global security state.
Big question: Can the ditch the dollar movement save us, albeit with great pain? And why is China now siding with Russia--why would they ever have cooperated with the Covid plot?
I'll offer on why the biolabs allowed in China, simply to ensure up-to-date know-how. Why would they say no to such an offer of in-house technology transfer? Dual use at that. Once the escape occurred in Wuhan, ensuring everyone else would have to face the same suck I believe was the goal. I don't think anyone knew ahead of time we'd go to lock-downs and masks and blow our own economic feet off for bad ideas. Once the $$ opportunity of a poor-"vaccine" became clear to the power grifters, they went for the money. (yes, I am aware of the pandemic scenario gaming that preceded the release; I don't buy a deliberate release. I think the gaming of scenarios was because these brilliant fools knew that plenty of labs were playing with viral genetic fire and an escape was inevitable. Yep, that foolish)
As for China siding with Russia, just taking advantage of a rare opportunity to join forces to get enough economic heft to drive the U.S. dollar off of world reserve status. I don't see China and Russia as being capable of supporting a stable partnership: they are an odd couple
China has been looking at alternative methods / technologies that nullify the United States military technology advantage. The gulf war was a shock to them. Bio Weapons, hacking, AI, Hypersonic Missiles, control of 5G, etc. are all priorities for China.
France was stupid enough to build China the state of the art bio lab, and got shut out of it.
The US bio warfare types wanted to do research not allowed in the US.
China has a history of bio lab leaks.
From what I can tell, you develop a virus / disease through gene splicing so you can then make a vaccine. That is “defensive” bio warfare research.
My guess, is China had a lab leak and decided to create a huge amount of fear to shut down the Western Economies and get rid of Trump, while using Covid to justify increasing their digital control of their own citizens.
It’s suspicious all the war gaming for this scenario that happened by western elites prior, as well as forecasts of this, and how hyped up it got by Who. Without Covid, I believe Trump would have been re-elected.
Is that bunker located in the City of London or New Zealand?
I clicked on the link and began to read the column at Foreign Policy...
"How far will mounting tensions with China be translated into the economic policy of the United States? After a rash of sanctions and overtly discriminatory legislation, with action on U.S. investment in China pending, and with talk of war increasingly commonplace in the United States, the Biden administration knows that it needs to clarify its economic relations with the country that is the largest U.S. trading partner outside North America."
I think Tooze means, "How loudly can neocons rattle their sabers at China while relying on China to keep producing everything that fills our houses and our businesses? After some panicky sanctions and protectionist legislation and threatening to invest our money at home, all of which fail to recognize America has no manufacturing base anymore and doesn't want one because of climate change, the Deep State knows it needs to extricate iself from the economic relationships between the Biden crime family and the country we send the most money to."
I picked December 2019 YTD trading partners at census.gov which was enlightening to me.
Mexico $615B = 256 exports to + 358 imports from
Canada $612B = 293 exports to + 320 imports from
China $559B = 107 exports to + 452 imports from, because it is just a hop and a skip away from Long Beach, California sure.
I didn't get pocket lint out of Tooze's packet of straw dogs. He poses a decent question ( "How far will mounting tension with China be translated into the economic policy of the United States?"), but then shambles around the hay kennel and ends with no structured answer. He doesn't state the rationale for Huawei sanctions, and uses a single Janet Yellen speech as quote fodder for his inside-baseball juxtapositions. My take away is that if this is what passes for serious thinking about US-China relations, well, no wonder!!
What do you make of Zhou choosing today to announce his re-election bid? And is Susan rice’s resignation meaningful?
I saw someplace that Zhou declaring his candidacy somehow protects him from the investigations that appear to be exposing more of the corruption into the wider public’s conscience. The theory goes that somehow anybody that is investigating him can now be accused of interfering in an election and labeled a threat to democracy and an Insurrectionist. It brushes the investigation back by giving the msm the talking point and narrative that it is only because of dangerous and unfair politics that the investigations are occurring. It all about the Narrative. Doesn’t have to true or even logical.
Seems it only cuts in one direction: even though we know the Dems’ dark art of projection, they get to continue their vilainy under the cover of the msm and DS allies (Barr-Garland and co)…
Right. That's what Bluto Barr would say if you asked him about Hunter's laptop.
Then wouldn't these same protections apply to Trump?
Nope. The Marxist Left does not have to be logical, consistent, or “fair.” They need only a “Narrative” to use. One they can use loudly and forcibly. It is now about pretend on the surface, and brute power underlying it.
Yep - for the left, the ends justify the means.
At this point impeachment proceedings against Biden should be initiated. It is the right thing to do, regardless of whether it would ultimately succeed.
The Biden Crime Family is arguably the most corrupt to ever occupy the WH--beyond all the other harm they have done to the country. If the country were functioning as a constitutional republic impeachment would be a no-brainer. As it is, political considerations will guide these decisions and will enter into the evaluation of "success".
Let's not sell the Clinton's short here. The Clinton's had a pretty good grift of their own going. What separates the two grifting families is time and conditions in the USA. The transformational decline and embrace of totalitarianism is farther along now than under Clinton. You would not hear about a stained blue dress today.
True, you don't hear much about "Bidencides". Perhaps they are slow learners (no doubt they are) but the night is young.
True. Perhaps we could distinguish between lawless and simply corrupt.
It’s a hard decision.
Leaving out the Arkancides, on the corruption side having drug addicted children is a red flag, but the Clinton Foundation is hard to beat.
What makes Biden the winner for most corrupt, is what was done to win the 2020 election and his involvement with Ukraine. Plus the continued jihad against Jan 6 useful idiots using the doj and fbi. Plus the vindictive lawfare against Trump.
Good point on the election fraud. Being so far down the totalitarian path what's taken place since Obama is startling. To be able to telegraph what they were up to, execute it with no push back, and then white washed away can only be accomplished in a totalitarian state reminiscent of Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany or Mao's China.
No doubt the Bidens are corrupt & greedy, but I think there are many unnamed corruptocrats that put Zhou up as their figurehead. Before Zhou is corrupt & greedy, he's a stupid nitwit.
Right, however I wasn't sure whether the peak Clinton corruption happened after leaving the WH, rather than while in it. Arkancide does get us to a totally 'nuther level.
Blackrock owns a chunk of FNC and I am sure the Khazarian mafioso who runs it made Murdoch an offer he couldn't refuse.
We don’t know if Tucker has a non compete clause from what I’ve read.
I've seen conflicting claims, nothing definitive.
OTOH, some are suggesting that Tucker could get around the non-compete--by running for president!
except, wef/Davos are - through the folly of the Ukraine war (gets NATO neutered and the even bigger foolishness of sanctions drives loss of world reserve currency) - not in a controlling position any longer: "control" (of the physical and financial resources that enable world trade market freedom of movement) is shifting to China & Russia via a 'BRICS' structure. The awful stupidity is that a multi-polar world is both desirable and inevitable as formerly poor countries engage in a world economy and steadily become wealthier (and healthier and better educated and safer and better able to offer positive cultural inputs to the world). The notion of control to service US national interests "on the scale of the planet" is both insane and impossible. Now we are stuck with an ascendant odd couple in a tyrannical godless/freedomless China and a paranoid freedom-groping yet god-embracing righteously angered Russia for as long as it will take for China to turn on Russia (was it ever thus?). I do agree getting here involved financial machinations at the largest nation-state level, but I see little in the whole *hit-house that cannot be explained by grossly-broad, nasty, and very stupid corruption by our world-wide elites. The US is broke, blew shepherding a transition to a productive multi-polar world and so won't be trusted with helping get there. We are too resource rich and creative/dynamic a culture to be squashed, but pray God, help us to get it together quick
Dear Castelletto - I like your synthesis, but believe wef/davos can't project much cultural or institutional oomph because the EU and anglo-sphere are broke, and populations in the EU now can see how screwed up is climate change policy (see the Dutch political scene; brace for impact as Germany goes sideways over industries exiting the country due to insane energy costs; the mercantilist-based manufacturing unions are uber-unhappy; pretty much dittos for rest of EU + UK), not to mention the travesty of the Ukrain war. Wef/Davos increasingly has no juice, but we are (pace Tom Luongo's Theory of Everything) in for a culture-shifting economic adjustment: no cash, no soup for you!
Neocon and WEF/Davos believers have a lot of overlap. There are a few Neocons that are non Davos, but not a lot.
Non Wef neocons I would include:
- Bolton
- Pompeo
Leftist / Democrats Neocons i can’t think of any non WEF/Davos supporters.
Tony Blair is definitely a Davos and Neocon, and was a Marxist in college.
WEF / Davos has a become a Western Elite cult.
And interesting how BlackRock grew from Pres. Clinton onward due to government policies.
Gut feeling - a lot of Wef / Davos / Soros money is used to elect Western Politicians that back their policies. In the US the Democrats have a very rigid ideology politicians need to hew to get funding. An example is Democratic Black Politicians are silent on illegal immigration now days, in the past they were not.
My take…
Wef / Davos I got more clued in when a real estate forecaster brought it up as a way to explain California Policies, and even cautioned it sounded a bit tin foil territory. After reading Agenda 2030 and other Wef stuff, it explained the insane Ca policies.
Wef / Davos represents the western elites that have become indoctrinated into a groupthink, including politicians, business leaders, etc. and are deeply intertwined with the financialization of Western Economies.
Soros he just keeps getting associated with troubling stuff. From pushing policies and electing secretaries of states and district attorneys to color revolutions.
Neocons goal is spreading their vision of US power / influence / culture through any means necessary, including military, economic (sanctions), lawfare, non profits, and even revolutions / coups. The ends justifies the means Is the modus operandi.
Interesting thought experiment - why do they hate Trump so much?
Fair enough.