Although I haven’t written today, until now, it’s actually been a busy day. When I wasn’t doing yard work I was reading and listening to videos. But I simply didn’t come across anything that I thought I could work into something worth publishing. However, here are a few stories that may prove of interest.
Thanks for confirmation that MI6 reports to "the Crown." It's especially important to know this because in the US we're constantly told that UK monarchy is merely "ceremonial," has no involvement in government when the exact opposite is true. Charles is well known for his incessant lobbying, but he learned from the Queen. In 1999 the Queen vetoed a bill that would’ve removed her power to order military strikes. And who was going to say no to either of them? No one.
1/13/2013, “Secret papers show extent of senior royals’ veto over bills,“ UK Guardian, Robert Booth
“Court order reveals how approval of Queen and Prince Charles is sought on range of bills:
Contrary to claims that they’re just “ceremonial,” senior UK Royals operate as lawmakers.
“In one instance the Queen completely vetoed the Military Actions Against Iraq Bill in 1999, a private member’s bill that sought to transfer the power to authorise military strikes against Iraq
you say: "Nellie Ohr was the real author of most of the Steele “Dossier”." Nope. It was Danchenko, for sure. Have you read his pre-Dossier Ukraine reports? Same sort of intel porn as Dossier.
I think it should be apparent from the above that the Russia Hoax was about a lot more than Hillary's emails. This was a major Deep State op with long range objectives in view.
Not sure if you've had a chance to read this Mark. Paul Sperry... https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2023/05/16/ex-doj_official_and_wife_had_bigger_roles_in_dossier_than_known_durham_report_899718.html
The crown is the western world's satanic servant, and wishes to subjugate and enslave all humankind.
Thanks for confirmation that MI6 reports to "the Crown." It's especially important to know this because in the US we're constantly told that UK monarchy is merely "ceremonial," has no involvement in government when the exact opposite is true. Charles is well known for his incessant lobbying, but he learned from the Queen. In 1999 the Queen vetoed a bill that would’ve removed her power to order military strikes. And who was going to say no to either of them? No one.
1/13/2013, “Secret papers show extent of senior royals’ veto over bills,“ UK Guardian, Robert Booth
“Court order reveals how approval of Queen and Prince Charles is sought on range of bills:
Contrary to claims that they’re just “ceremonial,” senior UK Royals operate as lawmakers.
“In one instance the Queen completely vetoed the Military Actions Against Iraq Bill in 1999, a private member’s bill that sought to transfer the power to authorise military strikes against Iraq
from the monarch to parliament."...https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills
I see, said 5he blind man.
Mark - Thanks for clarifying the British Role!
It’s amazing how little new information was in the Durham Report…
you say: "Nellie Ohr was the real author of most of the Steele “Dossier”." Nope. It was Danchenko, for sure. Have you read his pre-Dossier Ukraine reports? Same sort of intel porn as Dossier.
I think it should be apparent from the above that the Russia Hoax was about a lot more than Hillary's emails. This was a major Deep State op with long range objectives in view.