So the current phenomenon is MSM outlets starting to talk about post Covid trends: excess deaths—way, and improbably, UP; rare, lethal, virulent cancers—still lethal and virulent, but not so rare any more. Non-MSMers were predicting these trends and documenting them for quite a long time. Now MSMers are starting, but there’s a difference in what they’re saying. Certain topics are still not allowed or, if mentioned, are mentioned to be dismissed or characterized as improbable. In a way, of course, that’s progress—they have to talk about this stuff because the general population is increasingly aware and is getting information elsewhere than from the MSM.
Recently the WaPo came out with this article:
‘Unusual’ cancers emerged after the pandemic. Doctors ask if covid is to blame.
Right. Most informed people are asking, Are the gene therapy injections (aka “vaccines”) to blame? So this is a subtle way of deflecting readers from asking that quite sensible question. After all, gene therapy injections with a record of astronomical side effects just might look like a candidate for creating the conditions for a cancer epidemic. But no, we’re supposed to look at a virus that’s closely related to the common cold, the virus that some huge percentage of the population contracts virtually every year, even more than once in a year.
Digression: Covid injections continue to be hotly contested in court. Just yesterday the Ninth Circuit weighed in: California Covid Vaccine Mandate Suit Revived by Ninth Circuit. The lower court had relied on the famous Jacobson case from 1905 that allowed a smallpox vaccine mandate. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the blindlingly obvious contention of the plaintiffs that the smallpox vaccine has little if anything in common with the Covid gene therapy injections.
Dr. David Martin:
VINDICATION: CoV Bioweapon Injections WERE NOT VACCINES and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just concurred! NO MORE mRNA mandates:
"Addressing the merits, the panel held that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in concluding that the Policy survived rational basis review. Jacobson held that mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to preventing the spread of smallpox. Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a “traditional” vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply."
The Daily Mail carries an article that’s virtually identical to the WaPo one. Here’s difference:
Right. That’s science for you. Go for the unlikely culprit, dismiss the more likely culprit from consideration.
Viruses have been known to accelerate cancer since the 1960s, and researchers contend that a quarter of all cancers worldwide originated with HPV, Epstein-Barr virus, and hepatitis B.
They cannot definitively rule out the Covid vaccines as playing a role, but believe the evidence supporting the virus theory to be much stronger.
Lab tests suggest that coronavirus proteins can reawaken dormant cancer cells and fuel their growth, increasing the odds of being diagnosed with breast, stomach, and blood cancers.
Research into the links between Covid and cancer is relatively new, given the pandemic began only four years ago.
A 2023 report in the journal Biochimie detailed different means by which the coronavirus the coronavirus can change genes that usually stop tumors from forming and cause widespread inflammation throughout the body.
This inflammation might lead to the development of cancer cells in various organs, including the lungs, pancreas, and colon.
Here’s the few lines that the Daily Mail left out, but that the WaPo backhandedly included:
The idea that some viruses can cause or accelerate cancer is hardly new. Scientists have recognized this possibility since the 1960s, and today, researchers estimate 15 to 20 percent of all cancers worldwide originate from infectious agents such as HPV, Epstein-Barr and hepatitis B.
But there is no real world data linking SARS-CoV-2 to cancer, and some scientists remain skeptical.
John T. Schiller, a National Institutes of Health researcher and pioneer in the study of cancer-causing viruses, said pathogens known to cause cancer persist in the body long-term. But the class of respiratory viruses that includes influenza and RSV — a family that counts the coronavirus as a member — infects a patient and then typically goes away instead of lingering and is not believed to cause cancer.
“You can never say never, but that sort of … virus does not suggest being implicated in cancers,” Schiller said.
The WaPo does go on to minimize this expert’s view, suggesting that the huge upsurge is caused by people avoiding going to hospitals, or that the virus itself is to blame. They even give considerable play to a woman scientist telling us to wear masks. Follow what science?
On the other hand, this does raise another interesting question. If we accept the established fact that the Covid virus is a lab engineered virus, then it does become a legitimate concern for cancer researchers. But neither article raises that possibility—that a virus closely related to well known and relatively harmless viruses may have been modified in a disturbingly harmful direction. But the other disturbing aspect of this possibility is that there is plenty of evidence to suggest that Covid and the mRNA injections were a package deal—they were developed in conjunction with one another. Warp Speed was possible for that very reason.
Does history repeat itself?
Well, he has expressed repeatedly over many years that the world population needs to shrink. When people tell us their intentions and they have the means to follow through, we should believe them. Gates is a danger to humanity.
Quote
Camus @newstart_2024
May 27
Billionaire Bill Gates is funding dangerous gain-of-function research that seeks to create far deadlier and more contagious strains of bird flu capable of rapidly spreading through humans and livestock. Additionally, the Microsoft co-founder’s organization, the Bill & Melinda … [lots more at the link]
Anyway, with all this talk and deflection swirling around, Rogan weighed in, in the context of the Fauci hearings. I transcribed a 5 minute segment:
https://x.com/DrNoMask/status/1798784757385375796
It's wild when people don't know how insane they are. And you watch, like, oh, God, they think they're sane. They think they're fine. They think they're going to go on there and make a good argument.
Those are the most insane people, the ones that don't know.
Right. Yeah. You've been watching the Fauci hearings?
No.
Whoa. Dude, it's wild. It's wild.
What? What's going on with that?
Still, like, deeply in denial about everything. I mean, they confront him about emails they got, about deleting emails in preparation of a Freedom of Information Act request. They got emails from people that he worked with saying, you know, don't worry, Fauci is too smart to talk about this stuff on emails. You'll either have to deliver something to him or meet him in person. There's all this, like, weird deception shit. There's people that said this is clearly leaked from a lab. Look at the furin cleavage sites. They have to be--that's put into the virus to make it more infectious to human beings. They're talking about it in the email. And then that same guy, after talking to Fauci, like 3 days later, is like, it's ridiculous too think this came from a lab. This is clearly from a natural origin. And they're all talking about discrediting people who are talking about the lab leak theory.
I mean, what they did was insane, and they did it in front of everybody. And, finally, Fauci has to talk about it to people. But he's still in denial about all of it. There's no science that says masking for children works. There’s no science that says vaccinating children works, that it's good, that it's overall good. And the amount of people that have gotten wrecked by this, they're starting to recognize it in other countries. And they're talking about it in other countries. They haven't quite gone public with it in all the newspapers in the United States yet. But in the UK they're blaming it. There was the thing about Germany today. There was a front page of like a major newspaper. ...
And they're talking about excess deaths in the Phiilippines. They're talking about the amount of people that are no longer having children. The amount of less children that are born, because one of the side effects that is claimed is it wrecks women's fertility. Then it wreck's men's fertility, too. … Just, here we go. It says researchers from the Netherlands analyzed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there have been more than 3 million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures. Experts said the unprecedented figures raised serious concerns and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.
This is wild stuff, man. Because, you know, now that we're getting an understanding of how much deception was involved, like trying to blame it on a natural origin when they clearly knew it was a lab leak. And they still don't say it was a lab leak. It was clearly a lab leak. It's clearly, obviously, I'm not a doctor but, in my eyes, it looks like a f*cking lab leak. And most people that are educated think it's a f*cking lab leak. And this guy still does, is denying it and denying that it's even gain of function, that they even funded that research. But they changed the definition of gain of function for this particular vaccine.
What did they change it to?
Or the definition of gain of function on the NIH web site was changed. It was updated. So that was from the Telegraph. Covid vaccines may have helped fueled rise in excess deaths. The excess deaths have to be discussed and no one wants to because that's the real thing. The all cause mortality deaths, the big uptick in cancer and what they're calling turbo cancer. Obviously, again, I don't understand any of this stuff, but Peter McCullough was talking about what the mechanism behind this rise in cancer would be and how it could be tied into it. He was explaining it, like from a medical perspective, and it was just, the whole thing is so nuts. Like, when are we gonna learn?
MTG will have loved this one:
Ha! I get the feeling that the Covid volcano is going to blow at last. Let's hope they don't try and limit the damage and blame it all on Fauci. I can see the "One bad apple" headlines already. He was but the most visible player of a scurvy crew of power freaks and psychos, and everyone else involved needs to pay the price. That includes Trump as well. In general, the MSM limited hangout strategy has similarities to their Ukraine one: Phase 1 - We're winning and any naysayers are Russian spies/grannie killers! Phase 2 - Okay, we aren't winning, but we certainly aren't losing. Next comes the final Phase 3 - We lost but let's pin it on a rogue elements and move on to the next big thing. Along with the collapsing economy, Biden's dismal November prospects, and the coming disaster in Ukraine, is another good reason for the globalists to take us to war.
Isn’t Trump still bragging about saving millions of lives with his glorious vaccines? He’s also said without him it would have taken 5 years to develop them! We’d have been better off if it had taken 5 years. By then everyone would have been infected and had natural immunity. When Trump is held accountable by MAGA then I’ll know we are getting serious about punishing the culprits.