The Ninth Circuit ruling simply means that the officers get to argue their case to a jury. The judge will still give the jury instructions based on SCOTUS case law. The dismissal was based on the judge's view of the evidence needed to prove that the plaintiffs were the ones referred to by the crazed commie Sawant. It's not a ruling on defamation law.
The Ninth Circuit ruling simply means that the officers get to argue their case to a jury. The judge will still give the jury instructions based on SCOTUS case law. The dismissal was based on the judge's view of the evidence needed to prove that the plaintiffs were the ones referred to by the crazed commie Sawant. It's not a ruling on defamation law.
Your comment is completely idiotic.
@ctd I agree, it was the DA or whoever brought the indictment who "thrust Rittenhouse into the public eye".