I was a bit surprised that Jonathan Turley didn’t weigh in on the Rittenhouse verdict on Twitter yesterday. However, he has more than made up for that by turning out two thoughtful and informed full length articles. Let’s start with his ‘What’s Next?’ article:
The Ninth Circuit ruling simply means that the officers get to argue their case to a jury. The judge will still give the jury instructions based on SCOTUS case law. The dismissal was based on the judge's view of the evidence needed to prove that the plaintiffs were the ones referred to by the crazed commie Sawant. It's not a ruling on defamation law.
Ron Coleman stated on the record that Sandman received less than 750k. Kurt Shlichter concurred. Both said because defamation is very difficult to prove.
I'd like to know if Kyle can press charges for assault against Grosskreutz, now that the jury has determined that GK had no right to 'apprehend' Kyle with a gun and attempt to shoot him.
The Ninth Circuit ruling simply means that the officers get to argue their case to a jury. The judge will still give the jury instructions based on SCOTUS case law. The dismissal was based on the judge's view of the evidence needed to prove that the plaintiffs were the ones referred to by the crazed commie Sawant. It's not a ruling on defamation law.
Your comment is completely idiotic.
Ron Coleman stated on the record that Sandman received less than 750k. Kurt Shlichter concurred. Both said because defamation is very difficult to prove.
I'd like to know if Kyle can press charges for assault against Grosskreutz, now that the jury has determined that GK had no right to 'apprehend' Kyle with a gun and attempt to shoot him.
@ctd I agree, it was the DA or whoever brought the indictment who "thrust Rittenhouse into the public eye".