Pharma Genocide: An Alternative Theory

The post yesterday, The Pharma Genocide, has generated a fair amount of commentary. Today I’ll present an alternate theory to explain what’s going on. “What’s going on” clearly presents troubling features with similarities to what the author terms a unique and new form of genocide. At the same time, as I indicated yesterday, it seems to me that his thesis goes beyond the evidence.

Let’s start with the evidence.

What we undoubtedly see is human generated “pandemic.” I use the quotes because the term itself was redefined by our rulers, as we now know, with the intention of drumming up panic. Other measures fall into that category as well, especially the manipulation of data—the concept of a “casedemic” comes to mind, but the systematic attempt to censor informed dissenting views, based in long established science—fits in here too. The creation and maintenance of a panic has been used for clearly political ends, including the targeting of discrete segments of the population—it’s no secret that “unvaxxed” is used by the ruling class as a code word for “deplorables” and all that that term conveys.

On the other hand, while the death toll has been heavily driven by official measures of the ruling administrative state, the death toll to date—as well projected future deaths—seems less specific than one would expect from a true genocide. There is, of course, an exception: The heavy share of excess mortality borne by the elderly.

The question that needs an answer is: Was the release of the engineered virus an accident that was opportunistically used or was it a deliberate and calculated measure? The answer to that question may affect our judgment regarding subsequent events.

So here’s an alternate theory—one that I’m not dogmatic about. It’s a theory.

One thing we know is that most of the prime actors behind what has occurred are avid proponents not merely of population control but of actual population reduction. Bill Gates, to take a very prominent example, has seemingly advocated the use of “vaccines” to achieve those goals. Now, that suggests that outright genocide is not (or in the past was not) viewed as necessary—as ‘part of the plan or plandemic’—for achieving that goal.

Of course, if the release of the virus was intentional, then the view that we’re witnessing a novel form of genocide becomes inescapable. It would be a hidden genocide, but a genocide all the same. In such a case the young and healthy would survive, while the old and the unhealthy would die off. That would be 2020. The withholding of effective early treatment fits rather will within that scheme. The mandating of treatments that were very quickly recognized to be harmful and unnecessary (early ventilation, Remdesivir) also fits in. A further question is fairly obvious in this regard: If this was an intentional release of an engineered respiratory virus, to what extent were the likely long term effects of Covid known or foreseen?

Then there’s the issue of the “vaccines”. The deployment of these gene therapy medications for use against Covid could fit with either scenario: an intentional release of an engineered virus or an opportunistic use of an accidental release.

Here, however, we’re veering into the intentional, regardless of whether the release was intentional or accidental. It is now known, via FOIA, that the possibility of severe and widespread ‘side effects’ did not come as a surprise to Big Pharma—nor, surely, to our rulers. And yet the push for more injections continues. To quote again:

Coronavirus vaccines do not stop infection, transmission, or bad health outcomes including death. After nearly 500 million doses in the U.S., all-cause mortality and COVID-19 deaths have increased. Doubling down on vaccination, with three, four, or infinite doses or even reformulated doses will not stop the pandemic. This virus was always a bad candidate for a vaccine and mRNA and adenovirus vectors are no great breakthrough and no panacea.

Pharma knows all of the above. The CIA, NSA, NIH, and senior Pentagon leadership do too.

My view is that the second sentence is by far the most important of the two sentences in that paragraph. If the Deep State knows this—and who could reasonably doubt that they do?—then they can put a stop to it, as well.

Useful idiots in government do not necessarily understand the above even though they are the ones carrying out the orders. Only a handful of elected officials understand this.

If vaccines cause net harms, are being deployed worldwide, and every vaccine failure just leads to more vaccination, then this situation is best understood as a genocide.

Fauci, the FDA, CDC, NIH, and AMA are all blocking access to safe and effective treatments. This is a crime against humanity and clear evidence of genocidal intent. Every study in connection with every off the shelf treatment is listed (here).

So, here’s my alternative theory, which presumes an accidental release.

What if the initial release was accidental. It’s hard to argue against the view that the early response—which flew in the face of common principles of public health—was driven by a desire to maximize mortality among the old and infirm. The results are what you would expect if the planned excuse was to write off the die-off in institutional settings as the result of incompetence rather than being deliberate.

But then what if the initial success of the panic and the casualties among the old and infirm emboldened our rulers to push out the vaccines—in spite of or even because of the known risks? Could this have been the result of a decision to go for it—to go for the goal of significant depopulation based on what was originally an accident?

Highly qualified medical scientists fear just this long term prospect—a massive reduction in world population brought about by the long term effects of the vaccines, and effected by a mysterious rise in all cause mortality. That appears to be what we’re now seeing. The vaccine side effects have been horrific—by all historic standards these experimental medications should have been withdrawn almost immediately. But now we’re seeing a large increase in deaths that fall outside expected parameters. Yet the push for more injections continues, when by all scientific standards a halt should be called to get to the bottom of all these issues.

It seems to me that, while the initial release could have resulted from incompetence, the events of the past two years simply go way beyond that. And yet the obvious counter is: Who could be directing these events? How many people would you need to pull it off, and what positions would they need to occupy. The amount of coordination would need—or so it seems—to be phenomenal. How could you persuade countries like Israel to go down such a dangerous road—wouldn’t considerations of self interest cause ruling authorities to pull back? How could you keep the circle of knowledge tightly restricted?

These have been largely stream of consciousness reflections. What’s disturbing to me is that the longer I type the harder it becomes for me to write these considerations off as baseless conspiracy theory.