I really can’t recommend Paul Sperry’s latest article enough. It’s a must read for anyone following the Russia Hoax investigation of SC John Durham. It’s not that the article contains new revelations, so much, as that what has been discovered is organized and reviewed in highly readable form—for all of us who have been juggling the flood of information in our mind. The value in this effort at organizing the data is that Sperry is also able to credibly suggest—based on Durham’s latest status memo—the direction in which Durham is headed. A day or two ago I stated that the fact of Marc Elias’ appearance before Durham’s grand jury is a sure sign that Durham is targeting the upper reaches of the Clinton organization—and quite possibly Hillary herself, as the logic of such an investigation inexorably suggests. Sperry reminds us of some key facts in that regard. So, first things first, here’s the article:
In it, he catalogs what witnesses have testified to Durham GJs, and what documentary evidence has been collected, plus who he has interviewed, and what it suggests about what Durham is investigating.
Excellent adjunct to the Sperry report of a few days ago.
Durham appears to have squashed the Sergeant Schultz "I know nothing" refrain when it comes to Elias. Meanwhile, Hillary is beginning to look more and more like the completely inept Colonel Klink as the 'mastermind' and funder behind the initially successful coup attempt against Trump. How much longer Durham can wring the water out of this soggy sock is yet to be seen...
Good synapsis and update on the goings-on but here’s the thing. It actually bothers me less that Clinton’s campaign tried to manufacture dirt on trump (to be expected) than the fact that the US government used it and the FISA Court to spy on his administration. The people in her campaign should go down for their lies of course, but people like Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strozk, etc should get LOOOONG prison sentences for what they did. Plus, I would be interested to find out what is on Anthony Weiners laptop that the FBI forgot to look at…
What do you make of this?
>> Filed today - there is a sealed summons in the Igor Danchenko case.
At this stage of the case, it could very well be a superseding indictment.
>>> pic.twitter.com/JZTrr3Lyuh <<<
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) February 8, 2022
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1491199790411317253 <<
Techno Fog has another update earlier today:
>> https://technofog.substack.com/p/has-peter-strzok-testified-before <<
In it, he catalogs what witnesses have testified to Durham GJs, and what documentary evidence has been collected, plus who he has interviewed, and what it suggests about what Durham is investigating.
Excellent adjunct to the Sperry report of a few days ago.
I just finished it about a half hour ago, I'm breathless!!! You invitation to it is almost as long but it is so so so needed. Thanks!
Durham appears to have squashed the Sergeant Schultz "I know nothing" refrain when it comes to Elias. Meanwhile, Hillary is beginning to look more and more like the completely inept Colonel Klink as the 'mastermind' and funder behind the initially successful coup attempt against Trump. How much longer Durham can wring the water out of this soggy sock is yet to be seen...
Interesting that Flynn was being targeted by Clinton before Trumps election.
Good synapsis and update on the goings-on but here’s the thing. It actually bothers me less that Clinton’s campaign tried to manufacture dirt on trump (to be expected) than the fact that the US government used it and the FISA Court to spy on his administration. The people in her campaign should go down for their lies of course, but people like Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strozk, etc should get LOOOONG prison sentences for what they did. Plus, I would be interested to find out what is on Anthony Weiners laptop that the FBI forgot to look at…