Multiple Studies On Heart Damage From mRNA Shots

I’m not going to trust myself to present the data from these studies. They’re discussed in this article, the title of which should be enough to spark your interest:

Swiss study shows heart injury in all mRNA COVID jab recipients, myocarditis in 3%

There is now considerable evidence that mRNA gene therapies are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more.

First, here are a few paragraphs that give you the general idea:

(The Daily Sceptic) — New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the hearts of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths.

The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8 percent showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.

The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-COVID condition rather than the vaccines.

However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART noted that even though Australia had not had significant COVID (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-COVID deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART noted that Australia “did not have prior COVID as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021.” Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe, and the USA.”

The article goes on to discuss multiple international studies, including from Thailand and Israel—as well as much more about the Swiss study. Of course I highly recommend this article, as it strikes me as very important. It’s a bit technical for me, but there happens to be an excellent Youtube dealing with this, presented by Dr. Vinay Prasad. Prasad, as I gather, is a very well regarded researcher. The Youtube is an excellent supplement to the article.

Here is Prasad’s CV:

Vinay Prasad MD MPH is a hematologist-oncologist and Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco. He runs the VKPrasad lab at UCSF, which studies cancer drugs, health policy, clinical trials and better decision making. He is author of over 350 academic articles, and the books Ending Medical Reversal (2015), and Malignant (2020). He hosts the oncology podcast Plenary Session, the general medicine podcast the VPZD show is active on Substack and runs a YouTube Channel VinayPrasadMDMPH. He tweets @VPrasadMDMPH.

And here is Prasad’s less-than-13-minute explanation of the data, in something like layman’s language

In his concluding remarks, Prasad notes that, no matter how many injections you get, “all roads lead to Covid.” You will get Covid. The claim is that, the more injections, the less severe the Covid. However, as he notes, the interesting question is, What happens to your risk for serious heart damage when you keep getting shot up?

Now, yesterday we noted the new article at The Atlantic, in which the author—a professor at Brown University—suggests that it’s time for us to just move on from the Covid Regime, more or less forget that grotesque damage and oppression visited upon the world by the Covid Freaks. As you might expect, that article is getting a lot—and I mean A LOT—of negative feedback.

If you’re interested in sampling some of that negative feedback, a good place to start is Don Surber’s post today:

Covidians want amnesty

Now that the truth is out about covid, those smug and self-righteous pushers of vaccines that did not vaccinate and masks that didn't work are demanding we just forget about the whole thing.

…

Every one of those mocking chimps on late-night TV mocked the hell out of those who dared question authority.

People lost their jobs over this. They jailed a man for surfing when no one else was around. People died alone because the federal government banned hospital visits.

Covid panic was used to stop Trump's re-election. Democrats used covid as an excuse to flood the ballot box with mailed-in votes of a dubious nature.

Response on Twitter to Oster's demand of amnesty was awesome, which in itself is awesome in that Twitter was part of the government's enforcers to silence those who questioned authority.

And then he samples the responses.

Zerohedge also has an excellent article on this:

"You Murderous Hypocrites": Outrage Ensues After The Atlantic Suggests 'Amnesty' For Pandemic Authoritarians

The Atlantic has come under fire for suggesting that all the terrible pandemic-era decisions over lockdowns, school closures, masking, and punishing an entire class of people who questioned the efficacy and wisdom of taking a rushed, experimental vaccine - for a virus with a 99% survival rate in most, should all be water under the bridge.

"We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID," writes Brown Professor Emily Oster - a huge lockdown proponent, who now pleads from mercy from the once-shunned.

...

Except, they weren't “in the dark” about Covid.  There were numerous sources pointing out the actual science that ran contrary to the mandate claims, and they were deliberately silenced by a vast media campaign.  Evidence suggests that media platforms worked in tandem with Big Tech, the CDC and the Biden Administration.  It was not a simple matter of overreaction, there was collusion to remove all counter-information.  

It’s a longish article, and there are samples of really telling pushback. For my money, I like this one, but check it all out:

In one epic Twitter thread, Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Matthew J. Peterson (@docMJP) excoriates Oster's entire premise;

Hey—sorry you lost your job b/c of the vax that doesn’t work and your grandmother died alone and you couldn’t have a funeral and your brother’s business was needlessly destroyed and your kids have weird heart problems—but let’s just admit we were all wrong and call a truce, eh?

It’s too bad we shut the entire economy down & took on tyrannical powers that have never been used before in this country—looking back, you should have been able to go to church and use public parks while we let people riot in the streets—but it was a confusing time for everyone.

Hey I'm sorry we scared the hell out of you & lied for years & persecuted & censored anyone who disagreed but there was an election going on & we really wanted to beat Donald Trump so it was important to radically politicize the science even if it destroyed your children's lives.

OK, yes we said unvaccinated people should die & not get healthcare while never questioning Big Pharma once but we are compassionate people which is why even though we shut down the entire economy we also bankrupted the nation & caused inflation. You're welcome! Let's be friends.

As QTR's Fringe Finance notes, Oster’s plea for the decency that her ilk failed to offer up to most Americans during the throws of the pandemic comes at a point where the Covid narrative has been all but lost by the Democrats and the mainstream media.

Bastards.