More Good Commentary On The Flynn Case: Brett Tolman And Andy McCarthy
meaninginhistory.substack.com
Both Brett Tolman--a former US Attorney--and Andy McCarthy--a former federal prosecutor express the outrage that any decent person who cares about our constitutional order feels at Sullivan's frankly revolutionary ruling. However, they go a bit beyond that. Tolman offers a suggestion of a possible response that Sidney Powell could take, and both Tolman and McCarthy have some insightful comments that place this in legal and constitutional context--to show just how revolutionary Sullivan's usurpation is. The implication of his action is the claim that the Judiciary is empowered to usurp the Constitutional authoritiy of the Executive Branch. This is why I believe representatives of the Judiciary need to speak out. Now.
More Good Commentary On The Flynn Case: Brett Tolman And Andy McCarthy
More Good Commentary On The Flynn Case: Brett…
More Good Commentary On The Flynn Case: Brett Tolman And Andy McCarthy
Both Brett Tolman--a former US Attorney--and Andy McCarthy--a former federal prosecutor express the outrage that any decent person who cares about our constitutional order feels at Sullivan's frankly revolutionary ruling. However, they go a bit beyond that. Tolman offers a suggestion of a possible response that Sidney Powell could take, and both Tolman and McCarthy have some insightful comments that place this in legal and constitutional context--to show just how revolutionary Sullivan's usurpation is. The implication of his action is the claim that the Judiciary is empowered to usurp the Constitutional authoritiy of the Executive Branch. This is why I believe representatives of the Judiciary need to speak out. Now.