The conundrum that I see as far is Israel is concerned and support for it is this, way too many are looking at Israel and religious in biblical terms instead of separating the Jewish people from the decisions that the state of Israel makes. So, if you’re not supporting Israel, you are not supporting God you are not supporting, gods chosen people, and you are in affect antisemitic if you do not go along with the policies of BB Netanyahu, and the government of Israel at this point. No one is saying that Israel could not retaliate for the attack in October. The question is how far should Israel have gone to extract revenge?
Also, there are a lot of questions about why that attack happened, and the circumstances surrounding it the fact that Netanyahu and Israel in conjunction with United States, encourage Qatar to fund a Hamas for the last 14 years, somehow thinking they could control them. I’m still not satisfied with the answers I’ve seen, and I still believe Israel in Netanyahu basically wanted this confrontation to happened to do what they’re doing right now. The question has become when is enough enough?
Is this the same ICC that put out a warrant for President Putin? Thought so. If I read correctly the US is not considered a "member state" of this tribunal. Illegitimate perhaps. US doesn't recognize this therefore the ICC can ignore the letter from the Senators.
Well, yes and no. Yes, it's true that the US government probably wouldn't follow through on the personal threats against ICC personnel that the senators made. However, the senators could attempt further action in sanctioning these people from traveling to the US, traveling on US air carriers, conducting financial transactions in the US, etc. Again, it seems doubtful that the US government would enforce this, but it could make things unpleasant and uncertain.
Anthony Albanese the Prime Minister of Australia has requested that Julian Assange be allowed to return back home without the Sword of Damocles hanging over his (very weary) head .
I am sure the parents of the Reuters correspondents murdered by the unprecedented actions of the over zealous aircrew which Wikileaks reported on may well feel the same .
Enough is enough - Inter Country squabbling over finite points of law , led by the USA , who could not even be bothered to be represented in person at today's hearing , should spell out to the rest of us just what freedom of speech really means to this present Administration .
“because the media wants to create the illusion that Washington has things under control. It doesn't. Washington has lost control everywhere.”
Hence the need for a fall guy. Somebody to blame. The official narrative will change once the newly selected patsy is allowed to “win” the election and is sworn into office. Then suddenly stories will be relentless about what a mess the world finds itself in because of orange man bad of course. Maybe I’ve just become too cynical.
The conundrum that I see as far is Israel is concerned and support for it is this, way too many are looking at Israel and religious in biblical terms instead of separating the Jewish people from the decisions that the state of Israel makes. So, if you’re not supporting Israel, you are not supporting God you are not supporting, gods chosen people, and you are in affect antisemitic if you do not go along with the policies of BB Netanyahu, and the government of Israel at this point. No one is saying that Israel could not retaliate for the attack in October. The question is how far should Israel have gone to extract revenge?
Also, there are a lot of questions about why that attack happened, and the circumstances surrounding it the fact that Netanyahu and Israel in conjunction with United States, encourage Qatar to fund a Hamas for the last 14 years, somehow thinking they could control them. I’m still not satisfied with the answers I’ve seen, and I still believe Israel in Netanyahu basically wanted this confrontation to happened to do what they’re doing right now. The question has become when is enough enough?
Is this the same ICC that put out a warrant for President Putin? Thought so. If I read correctly the US is not considered a "member state" of this tribunal. Illegitimate perhaps. US doesn't recognize this therefore the ICC can ignore the letter from the Senators.
Well, yes and no. Yes, it's true that the US government probably wouldn't follow through on the personal threats against ICC personnel that the senators made. However, the senators could attempt further action in sanctioning these people from traveling to the US, traveling on US air carriers, conducting financial transactions in the US, etc. Again, it seems doubtful that the US government would enforce this, but it could make things unpleasant and uncertain.
Anthony Albanese the Prime Minister of Australia has requested that Julian Assange be allowed to return back home without the Sword of Damocles hanging over his (very weary) head .
I am sure the parents of the Reuters correspondents murdered by the unprecedented actions of the over zealous aircrew which Wikileaks reported on may well feel the same .
Enough is enough - Inter Country squabbling over finite points of law , led by the USA , who could not even be bothered to be represented in person at today's hearing , should spell out to the rest of us just what freedom of speech really means to this present Administration .
“because the media wants to create the illusion that Washington has things under control. It doesn't. Washington has lost control everywhere.”
Hence the need for a fall guy. Somebody to blame. The official narrative will change once the newly selected patsy is allowed to “win” the election and is sworn into office. Then suddenly stories will be relentless about what a mess the world finds itself in because of orange man bad of course. Maybe I’ve just become too cynical.
"Help me out here."
More than happy to help you out.