Land For Peace, NATO Version

I take the Financial Times to be a reliable echo chamber for the Anglo-Zionist Empire. So, when the FT reports that the Anglo-Zionists want to trade land for peace in Ukraine, wacky as that may sound, I accept that as true. Glenn Diesen, whose Youtube channel was canceled in the latest censorship purge, comments:

Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen

NATO expansion is the source of the war and the territorial dispute is the symptom of the war - so why would the Russians accept a "land-for-NATO" peace agreement?

- At the Istanbul negotiations, Russia offered Ukraine the return of its land for neutrality.

- Russia considers NATO expansion to Ukraine to be an existential threat, which is why there is a war. NATO can disagree with Russia's assessment but there cannot be any doubt that this is the view of Russia that it will act upon. There is overwhelming evidence for this and no serious scholar can deny it.

- The need to preserve NATO's war narrative results in a lot of harmful self-delusion as important facts must be ignored. Paths to peace are ignored and the war is continuously escalated.

11:21 PM · Oct 5, 2024

Sound really crazy to you? But wait, the details are even wackier. SLKanthan:

S.L. Kanthan @Kanthan2030

The West has acknowledged defeat in Ukraine and is proposing the “Germany model.”

That is, let Russia keep Eastern Ukraine, and allow the new Ukraine into NATO.

But the US wants all sorts of loopholes;

• allow NATO troops to stay in Ukraine “temporarily”

• No nuclear weapons “unless Ukraine is threatened”

And so on.

But Putin has the upper hand now, so let’s see.

3:22 AM · Oct 6, 2024

How do you say DOA in Russian? Until I can figure that out, this will suffice:

Will Schryver @imetatronink

There are rumors afoot that Ukraine and its imperial overlords are floating a NATO / Russia partition.

I give that outcome zero probability.

The Anglo-Zionists are living in a fantasy world. I know that sounds like a redundancy at this point, but the depth of their delusions is still stunning.

Speaking of Ukraine, if you’re looking for a very detailed explanation of why the fall of Ugledar is so important—I recently referred to Ugledar as the linchpin holding the Ukrainian Zaporozhye and Donbas fronts together—look no further than Simplicius’ latest SitRep:

SITREP 10/5/24: Post-Ugledar Landscape Unfurls into Dark Ukrainian Future

However, this brief excerpt gives an idea of what to expect in the fairly near term, because events are unfolding more quickly with each passing day. Simplicius is summarizing the views of Oleksii Arestovich, in a recent interview:

In short, he says the collapse will accelerate in 3-4 months. Russia will for the first time be able to utilize full-on maneuver warfare to get into Ukraine’s “rear” areas, particularly with special ops forces, and all hell will break loose at that point. Essentially, he predicts the collapse of the AFU.

He states the two or three breakthrough areas will turn into six or seven, snowballing more and more. Right now there’s Ugledar, Pokrovsk, and Toretsk directions. But it is true that signs of instability are growing for the AFU in several other directions, particularly in the Kupyansk-Seversk axis, where Russia has made steady gains recently. There’s also been signs of upcoming pick-ups in movement in Zaporozhye.

Thus, I can definitely see his words ringing true as in several months all of those directions will face severe pressure and what just happened to the 72nd Brigade will begin to be faced by many others along the contact line.

Arestovich concludes that this avalanche will lead to the loss of all Ukrainian industrial centers east of the Dnieper, including Poltava, Zaporozhye, Kharkov, etc.

I can’t see the Russians stopping at the Dnieper. By the time they reach the Dnieper most serious resistance will have been crushed. The beginning of maneuver warfare as predicted by Arestovich should mean deep and rapid advances.