In my view, a big tell will be if there are zero Twitter responses to the Patel interview by those he mentioned as likely targets. Seems like anyone who made such accusations in what now seems the distant past was carpet bombed by the accused or their surrogates on Twitter, or wrote editorials for the Times or the Post. At this point, …
In my view, a big tell will be if there are zero Twitter responses to the Patel interview by those he mentioned as likely targets. Seems like anyone who made such accusations in what now seems the distant past was carpet bombed by the accused or their surrogates on Twitter, or wrote editorials for the Times or the Post. At this point, silence on their part may well be as good an indicator we have on how far Durham has advanced the ball across the field.
"an indicator we have on how far Durham has advanced...."
Or, an indicator on how little that matters any more, given Biden's pardon powers.
Regarding all of these hoped-for "cooperators", I'll bet that Page, Strzok, Ohr, Prietsap, and Baker have had pardons dangled at them, and I'll be surprised if they say boo that matters.
Yes, I'd mentioned the pardon possibility in a previous post on this topic but saw no reason to keep beating on that horse today. But, should pardons be the route this administration takes to keep the guilty from facing punishment, that will be a revelation of its own. As more of the corruption is revealed the less standing these evil doers and those that would protect them will have - including the media.
In my view, a big tell will be if there are zero Twitter responses to the Patel interview by those he mentioned as likely targets. Seems like anyone who made such accusations in what now seems the distant past was carpet bombed by the accused or their surrogates on Twitter, or wrote editorials for the Times or the Post. At this point, silence on their part may well be as good an indicator we have on how far Durham has advanced the ball across the field.
"an indicator we have on how far Durham has advanced...."
Or, an indicator on how little that matters any more, given Biden's pardon powers.
Regarding all of these hoped-for "cooperators", I'll bet that Page, Strzok, Ohr, Prietsap, and Baker have had pardons dangled at them, and I'll be surprised if they say boo that matters.
Yes, I'd mentioned the pardon possibility in a previous post on this topic but saw no reason to keep beating on that horse today. But, should pardons be the route this administration takes to keep the guilty from facing punishment, that will be a revelation of its own. As more of the corruption is revealed the less standing these evil doers and those that would protect them will have - including the media.
Yeah, that will be a revelation of its own, but that may be a price that the DS is willing to pay, since much of it'll blow over, in many key circles.
Whereas, the drip drip, of years of busts, pleas, etc., may bring out too much w/ real, lasting impact.
The only one giving any pardons is going to be God.
"they would still have to testify about everyone else or face new perjury or obstruction of justice charges."
So?
If they refuse to testify, and are thereby charged, they'll get pardoned for that too. Rinse and repeat.
Face it, they're all Made Men (& Women), seeing as they all Paid their Dues, when it mattered (in sabotaging DJT).
And, when they defend their refusal to testify, "in order to protect the institutions", the Barrs, Mitchs, etc. will all-but give them a Standing O.