Sachs doesn’t mention Jeremy Corbyn, an exception to Imperial “vaulting ambition,” and we know what befell him…also I think even QE II was never herself a driver of Britain Uberalles, even though she issues from that long lineage…
With Trump, you never know. He has placed his own disinformation to control the news cycle. But, being the WSJ it smells of neocons trying to control the conversation.
Listening to Sachs on The Duran, he pointed out that US Presidents come and go, but Netanyahu is still here 30 years on with his Clean Break plan in progress.
I fear the Trump administration is shot through with Israel Firsters, who believe what is good for Israel is good for the US, and what is bad for Israel is bad for the US. And they have the money to back that up. Also exploding pagers.
Compare this belief to the Catholic concept of "malum in se", bad-in-itself, intrinsic evil: some actions are intrinsically evil and must not be done, even in an attempt to secure a great good.
Yes, neocons gave us a great commission to go and make disciples of all nations. But it is the zionists who define what is "malum in se". Any actions opposed to Israeli interests are intrinsically evil: we must not do evil to Israeli interests in hopes that good may come for US interests.
This is a terrible state of play to find ourselves in. It is utterly opposed to Christ and his central message that he, not the Jewish nation, is the path to salvation. There is nothing in the Gospel from which you can derive the sending of weapons systems to Israel to bring about the second coming of Christ.
Well said! They (zionists - jews and dispensationalists) are trying to ‘immanentize the eschaton’. They are of the synagogue of satan, and by their fruits you will know them - horror upon horror: as you say, utterly in opposition to Christ and His message.
I distinguish the people from the country. Somewhere in Israel there is a woman my age who was born there and grew up there. She's got nowhere else to go, and her country has told her over and over and over that her people will die if they do not "rise and kill first" all the peoples around them. You are never absolutely safe until all your enemies are dead, right? Judaism may, but Zionism does not, have an argument against this policy for its people. It's not her fault she was born into a racially exclusive colonization project that began in the 19th century. She has a soul, she has free will. I also have a soul, I have free will. I was born into a colonization project begun in the 17th century, that was not racially exclusive in theory, not in its Christian roots, though in practice it often was. I was born here and grew up here and I have nowhere else to go, and my country has told me over and over and over that Americans will die here if we don't go fight "them" over there, across the ocean. My religion has an argument against this policy... I like my religion because it gives me tools to think about innocence and guilt that exceed the bounds of my race. Also my time: should the son be punished for the sins of his father? What is collective guilt, and punishment? What can I do to protect my children without going after the children of my enemy? Without giving in to treating them, or anyone else... or myself... like an animal?
So no cognitive dissonance. People do evil; people in positions of power are able to do great evils. Israel is a wound that may never heal. Let us not participate in the evils of their leadership in hopes that good may come for us or for them. Trump's cabinet is a disappointment.
Where can I read about 'protestantism is a judaizing heresy'? Is there a book?
Sachs doesn’t mention Jeremy Corbyn, an exception to Imperial “vaulting ambition,” and we know what befell him…also I think even QE II was never herself a driver of Britain Uberalles, even though she issues from that long lineage…
Of course, the reports re Trump/Iran appeared in the WSJ, so possible disinfo.
With Trump, you never know. He has placed his own disinformation to control the news cycle. But, being the WSJ it smells of neocons trying to control the conversation.
Listening to Sachs on The Duran, he pointed out that US Presidents come and go, but Netanyahu is still here 30 years on with his Clean Break plan in progress.
I fear the Trump administration is shot through with Israel Firsters, who believe what is good for Israel is good for the US, and what is bad for Israel is bad for the US. And they have the money to back that up. Also exploding pagers.
Compare this belief to the Catholic concept of "malum in se", bad-in-itself, intrinsic evil: some actions are intrinsically evil and must not be done, even in an attempt to secure a great good.
Yes, neocons gave us a great commission to go and make disciples of all nations. But it is the zionists who define what is "malum in se". Any actions opposed to Israeli interests are intrinsically evil: we must not do evil to Israeli interests in hopes that good may come for US interests.
This is a terrible state of play to find ourselves in. It is utterly opposed to Christ and his central message that he, not the Jewish nation, is the path to salvation. There is nothing in the Gospel from which you can derive the sending of weapons systems to Israel to bring about the second coming of Christ.
Well said! They (zionists - jews and dispensationalists) are trying to ‘immanentize the eschaton’. They are of the synagogue of satan, and by their fruits you will know them - horror upon horror: as you say, utterly in opposition to Christ and His message.
Hmm.
I distinguish the people from the country. Somewhere in Israel there is a woman my age who was born there and grew up there. She's got nowhere else to go, and her country has told her over and over and over that her people will die if they do not "rise and kill first" all the peoples around them. You are never absolutely safe until all your enemies are dead, right? Judaism may, but Zionism does not, have an argument against this policy for its people. It's not her fault she was born into a racially exclusive colonization project that began in the 19th century. She has a soul, she has free will. I also have a soul, I have free will. I was born into a colonization project begun in the 17th century, that was not racially exclusive in theory, not in its Christian roots, though in practice it often was. I was born here and grew up here and I have nowhere else to go, and my country has told me over and over and over that Americans will die here if we don't go fight "them" over there, across the ocean. My religion has an argument against this policy... I like my religion because it gives me tools to think about innocence and guilt that exceed the bounds of my race. Also my time: should the son be punished for the sins of his father? What is collective guilt, and punishment? What can I do to protect my children without going after the children of my enemy? Without giving in to treating them, or anyone else... or myself... like an animal?
So no cognitive dissonance. People do evil; people in positions of power are able to do great evils. Israel is a wound that may never heal. Let us not participate in the evils of their leadership in hopes that good may come for us or for them. Trump's cabinet is a disappointment.
So called "Britain" hasn't had agency since Cromwell let the Jewish bankers in. ~1650. Total ZoG as US since 1913..