Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Crawford's avatar

I had the same response when I saw Trump's comment, i.e., that he was the only one getting out in front on this and that it should turn out to be a nice, bright line not only between him and the Dems but him and his primary opponents, as well. DeSantis got off to a great start when he referred to the conflict as a territorial dispute but then went totally silent. If and when his primary candidacy flames out, I will see his running away from this issue, so far at least, as the single greatest opportunity lost.

It seems no one can win the R nomination anymore who won't take a ballsy stand against permanent war (at least we should all hope this is so), and it will be really disappointing (for me at least) if one and only one viable candidate understands that in properly actionable terms. If a major chunk of a candidate's political support depends on kowtowing to the permanent war types, then his only two choices are to abandon that support and roll the dice without it or recognize he doesn't have a chance in hell of getting the nomination.

Expand full comment
ML's avatar

Very heartening to hear. Trump the diplomat, calling a spade a spade. It’s now put up or shut up Rhinos and other “conservatives.” Prace through strength - trust but verify. Now where have we heard that before?

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts