How Much Stuff Can Hit The Fan Before November?

Where are we, geopolitically, these days? This map helps explain the tight spot the Israel Lobby and the Anglo-Zionist empire has landed the American people in:

MenchOsint @MenchOsint

Tensions are escalating at the same time between:

- Ukraine & Russia

- Israel & Lebanon

- Taiwan & China

- South Korea & North Korea

In each conflict there is a foreign country, which is roughly located 10.000 km away, who fully backs one side.

Any guess who it can be ?

5:58 AM · Jun 24, 2024

In the grand scheme of the Anglo-Zionist ideologues who rule America, these hot spots were supposed to flare up in a strict order, one after the other. The Israel - Gaza one wasn’t supposed to happen at all—as famously stated by Jake Sullivan. Instead, as one has come to expect from these clowns, it’s all happening at the same time. Nothing daunted, they continue to stir the pot.

This morning I presented the case that Israel, undoubtedly with the connivance of the Anglo-Zionist empire, is attempting to bully the Lebanese government into taking on the impossible task of ejecting Hezbollah from southern Lebanon—using the threat of nuclear war as the bully threat. With all that going on—and events do continue to escalate in the Middle East generally—the US has launched two terror strikes in Russia. Now, I listened to Alastair Crooke this morning, speaking with Judge Nap. Crooke was quite worked up over the escalating US attacks on Russia. He sees these attacks as attempts to provoke an over the top response from Russia that will instigate a global war. I continue to believe that the continual escalation is part of a bullying strategy. The idea is to convince Putin that the combined threat of internal disorder—especially the threat of ethno-religious chaos—stemming from US orchestrated terrorist attacks and the attacks on Russian infrastructure and civilians will cause Putin to eventually seek a ceasefire to prevent his own ouster.

That Anglo-Zionist fantasy is not going to happen. However it may lead to very unpleasant consequences at some point in the next four months. The Anglo-Zionist use of bullying tactics is typical of their mentality—they believe they can intimidate the rest of the world. They cannot comprehend that their bullying will not work against Russia and China. It will only engender a very deep anger that will, sooner or later, result in harsh responses—whether symmetric or asymmetric.

Now, I referred to the missile attack on Crimea and the terrorist attack in Dagestan as US attacks. Let’s consider US complicity in these crimes. First, a five minute video by Scott Ritter. He doesn’t rant. He very soberly presents the reality of US complicity in these crimes, US responsibility. The preparation of these attacks could only have been done with the help of the US. ISIS is a US/UK/Israeli creature—nothing else:

Next, I’ll quote a portion of a Megatron tweet that lays out the facts equally clearly. What Megatron says was already stated by Russian foreign minister Lavrov yesterday—and Lavrov promised a Russian response:

The ATACMS cluster warhead missiles that made a massacre in Crimea yesterday, are not controlled by Ukraine

The only thing Ukrainian about them is that they are launched from Ukrainian territory.

The experts working with the systems are NATO experts. These are those "instructors" and "experts" that NATO and its members openly declared and announced that they are sending to Ukraine en masse.

The navigation systems and drones that guide the missiles belong to the United States and they do so constantly over the Black Sea. And yesterday before and during the strike, these drones were flying near Crimea.

NATO is now directly striking Russia, including civilian targets.

What was the US response? Insolent lying. Can you imagine what our response would be if Russian supplied missiles armed with cluster anti-personnel munitions were launched at an American beach from a third country but with the involvement of Russian missile technicians and guided by Russian drones? And how would we respond to this insolent lie:

Megatron @Megatron_ron

BREAKING:

 The Pentagon blamed Ukraine for yesterday's massacre in Crimea, unwittingly admitting that the US administration is arming entities that massacre civilians:

Pentagon spokesperson says "Ukraine makes its own targeting decisions and conducts its own military operations"

11:24 AM · Jun 24, 2024

Danny Davis today states that claims that Ukraine is operating the ATACMS systems are simply untrue. “For certain” these systems are operated by NATO personnel.

Larry Johnson, in a way similar to Alastair Crooke, suggests that the Anglo-Zionist regime in DC is hoping to provoke a Russian response that will somehow galvanize American support for the Zhou administration. It’s worth reading in its entirety, but here are some key excerpts:

U.S. CROSSES REDLINE AND RUSSIA IS NOW READY TO RESPOND WITH FORCE

I think we are on the cusp of a major escalation in the war in Ukraine, with U.S. assets likely to be targeted in the coming days. It is one thing for Ukraine to hit military targets inside Russia, but Ukraine’s attack with U.S. supplied missiles today on tourists sunbathing on the beaches of Sevastopol breached a Russian-redline that is likely to provoke a significant Russian response, which will include targeting U.S. reconnaissance aircraft operating in the Black Sea and the Baltic Ocean. And that is for starters.

…

I believe that Russia will now kick the war into a higher gear and Ukraine, along with its Western allies, will experience a new level of devastation. I don’t know if this was a deliberate effort by the Biden Administration to provoke a Russian military response, foolishly believing that a Russian response to the Sevastopol attack will rally the American public around the fading fortunes of Joe Biden. If so, it is a stupid, counterproductive bet.

Once again, I would argue that this is part of the bullying tactic I described, above. The improbable aim is to intimidate Putin and Russians generally into buckling under to Anglo-Zionist demands. The result is likely to be something very different.

Finally, for a very animated and incisive discussion of all this, I recommend this hour long video (I’m still listening) featuring Danny Davis and Alexander Mercouris of The Duran.

Kremlin Warns U.S. w/The Duran's Alexander Mercouris

As an example, in discussing the dangerous notion that Putin just bluffs, or that Russia will not respond directly to the US, Mercouris points out (at about the 14 minute mark):

The way I read it is that this time [Putin] is—or, rather, the Russians are—talking about some kind of answer to the United States itself, otherwise why would they call in the American ambassador? Why would they give this warning to the American ambassador himself? I mean, it seems to me that some kind of response against the United States is on it way, and it's not difficult to guess what some of that might be. The Russians have already talked about providing weapons to American enemies. We've just had a trip by Putin to North Korea which should alarm people perhaps even more than it is already doing, and of course there's lots of people around the world—in the Middle East, especially—who have their own quarrels with the United States. If they start acquiring Russian weapons—you know, sophisticated Russian weapons—it will be a very serious problem. The long and the short of it is that American lives are now on the line because people have been disregarding these Russian warnings and have been behaving in this reckless way.