At dinner with my wife I was discussing Trump’s strengths and weaknesses, in the context of whether it would be best for him to run again or not. We both agreed that in many respects Trump is a very intelligent man, but that he displays areas of surprising naivete. For example, his seeming trust in career military high rankers to be straight shooters. Or, similarly, his seeming belief that scientists “follow the science” rather than the path of least resistance for career enhancement, or even blatantly political agendas. I suggested that the J6 quest to destroy Trump, possibly through a criminal referral, may backfire big time. My guess is that most of the country would see such a move as blatantly and partisanly political—Trump would end up playing an heroic role against the DC swamp. It might also make someone like DeSantis, if he follows good advice, unbeatable and even a much tougher president than Trump ever was. YMMV.
Dr. Pry is also forward looking about EMP and the dangers is presents. Guy is good. Our industrial base is not capable of fighting a protracted war against a country with a real military i.e. near peer. Our technology is second to none but exceedingly expensive and hard to replace. Imagine if a China could sink one of our AC! How bout 2? Possible? Maybe and if that happens where do the replacements come from? World War 2 levels of production are over. BTW, if we could build em, where does the money come from?
Pry seems to understand quite well the world view and goals of the WEF and the globalists in Europe, the U.K., and the Biden admin. Given those goals and their current level of political power, it is hard for me to understand why he thinks they would ever want to negotiate with Russia (even if by proxy) to come to some sort of alliance with it. This is exactly what Putin has been attempting to do for years to no avail. So is he howling at the moon here?
I think Pry's view is well-intended and rational from a traditional realpolitik national strategic point of view (that is, basically from a Kissinger point of view) but the WEF/globalists have ALREADY rejected the Kissinger point of view and care nothing for strategic alliances with nation states - they are aiming at total global control.
In addition to that, at this point the Russians will not negotiate because they no longer trust the West and because they have nothing to be gained by negotiating. They will win the war and will turn Ukraine into a rump landlocked state. The Europeans better hope the war is over by Fall. Otherwise it could be a long cold Winter (but maybe enough will be set on fire during the riots to provide the needed heat).
Maybe the Germans will block the idiocy of the Swedes and Finns? A rollback of NATO to the 1997 membership would be smart, with one other withdrawal, that being the USA.
This could explain why Trump is being so cautious.
Basically the deep state is trying for Impeachment 3.0 powered by the the DOJ and FBI, sigh. The first 2 impeachments, and associated investigations, had a huge impact on Trump's ability to govern. The Jan 6 " Jussie Smollet" investigation is imploding, but the real threat is this stealth investigation.
I particularly like his comparison of when Nasa tried to create a pen that could work in no gravity. They spent $1 million to develop it and the Russians decided it was just as easy to use a pencil.
Offering a 4th option: reliance on tactical nukes.
Dr. Pry is also forward looking about EMP and the dangers is presents. Guy is good. Our industrial base is not capable of fighting a protracted war against a country with a real military i.e. near peer. Our technology is second to none but exceedingly expensive and hard to replace. Imagine if a China could sink one of our AC! How bout 2? Possible? Maybe and if that happens where do the replacements come from? World War 2 levels of production are over. BTW, if we could build em, where does the money come from?
Pry seems to understand quite well the world view and goals of the WEF and the globalists in Europe, the U.K., and the Biden admin. Given those goals and their current level of political power, it is hard for me to understand why he thinks they would ever want to negotiate with Russia (even if by proxy) to come to some sort of alliance with it. This is exactly what Putin has been attempting to do for years to no avail. So is he howling at the moon here?
I think Pry's view is well-intended and rational from a traditional realpolitik national strategic point of view (that is, basically from a Kissinger point of view) but the WEF/globalists have ALREADY rejected the Kissinger point of view and care nothing for strategic alliances with nation states - they are aiming at total global control.
In addition to that, at this point the Russians will not negotiate because they no longer trust the West and because they have nothing to be gained by negotiating. They will win the war and will turn Ukraine into a rump landlocked state. The Europeans better hope the war is over by Fall. Otherwise it could be a long cold Winter (but maybe enough will be set on fire during the riots to provide the needed heat).
Maybe the Germans will block the idiocy of the Swedes and Finns? A rollback of NATO to the 1997 membership would be smart, with one other withdrawal, that being the USA.
Trump Trusted:
- Top Military Leadership
- Medical Establishment, including cdc and fda.
- Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnel and eGOP
- Trusted FBI and DOJ
He was betrayed by all of them, and he realizes it.
Unfortunately Trump still has not admitted the Truth on the jab.
This could explain why Trump is being so cautious.
Basically the deep state is trying for Impeachment 3.0 powered by the the DOJ and FBI, sigh. The first 2 impeachments, and associated investigations, had a huge impact on Trump's ability to govern. The Jan 6 " Jussie Smollet" investigation is imploding, but the real threat is this stealth investigation.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/06/the-stealth-inspector-general-investigation-of-donald-trump/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NR%20Daily%20Monday%20through%20Friday%202022-06-28&utm_term=NRDaily-Smart
GL says basically the same thing: https://youtu.be/d-BzyGQ_XSg
I particularly like his comparison of when Nasa tried to create a pen that could work in no gravity. They spent $1 million to develop it and the Russians decided it was just as easy to use a pencil.
Awesome! Thanks